Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 622

Investing at market peaks: The surprising truth

After crashing hard in April, the US stock market rebounded even harder, recently hitting a new all-time high. This has left many investors feeling nervous about the potential for a fall.

Many others have parked savings in cash, attracted by the high rates on offer. The thought of investing that cash-on-the-sidelines when the stock market is at an all-time high feels uncomfortable. But should it?

The conclusion from our analysis of stock market returns since 1926 is unequivocal: no.

The market is actually at an all-time high more often than you might think. Of the 1,187 months since January 1926, the market was at an all-time high in 363 of them, 31% of the time.

And, on average, 12-month returns following an all-time high being hit have been better than at other times: 10.4% ahead of inflation compared with 8.8% when the market wasn’t at a high. Returns on a two or three-year horizon have been similar regardless of whether the market was at an all-time high or not (see chart below).

Figure 1: Returns have been higher if you invested when the stock market was at an all-time high than when it wasn’t
Average inflation-adjusted returns for US large cap equities, p.a.

Differences compound over time

$100 invested in the US stock market in January 1926 would be worth $103,294 at the end of 2024 in inflation-adjusted terms, growth of 7.3% a year. In contrast, a strategy which switched out of the market and into cash for the next month whenever the market hit an all-time high (and went back in again whenever it wasn’t at one) would only be worth $9,922 (Figure 2). This is 90% lower! The return on this portfolio would have been 4.8% in inflation-adjusted terms. Over long time horizons, differences in returns can seriously add up.

Figure 2: Selling stocks whenever the market was at an all-time high would have destroyed 90% of your wealth in the very long-run
Growth of $100, inflation-adjusted terms

This analysis covers a nearly 100-year time horizon, longer than most people plan for. But, even over shorter horizons, investors would have missed out on a lot of potential wealth if they had taken fright whenever the market was riding high (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Selling stocks whenever the market was at an all-time high would have destroyed 90% of your wealth in the very long-run
Growth of $100, inflation-adjusted terms

Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated.
Data January 1926-December 2024. Y-axis is a logarithmic scale. Switching strategy moves into cash for the next month whenever the previous month-end was an all-time high, and is invested in stocks whenever it wasn’t. Results exclude transaction costs. Stocks represented by Ibbotson® SBBI® US Large-Cap Stocks, Cash by Ibbotson® US (30-day) Treasury Bills. Source: Morningstar Direct, accessed via CFA Institute and Schroders.

Conclusion? Don’t fret over all-time highs

It is normal to feel nervous about investing when the stock market is at an all-time high, but history suggests that giving in to that feeling would have been very damaging for your wealth. There may be valid reasons for you to dislike stocks. But the market being at an all-time high should not be one of them.

 

Duncan Lamont, CFA is Head of Strategic Research at Schroder Investment Management Australia. This material is general information only and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Schroders does not give any warranty as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of information which is contained in this material. Read the full report and important disclaimers here.

For more articles and papers from Schroders, click here.

 

  •   30 July 2025
  • 11
  •      
  •   
11 Comments
John Derry
July 31, 2025

What about in the context of highest percentile valuations? That usually paints a different picture.

Z Nut
July 31, 2025

Thank you for this insightful analysis.
I’m curious how the findings might apply in a scenario like this:
Suppose someone has been consistently investing a fixed monthly amount into ASX:VTS over the past few years. Now, without selling their existing VTS holdings, they continue investing the same monthly amount into ASX:VEQ instead (based on the view that European equities appear less overvalued than U.S. ones).
Has anyone explored how this kind of regional rotation strategy performs over time?

Steve
August 01, 2025

Very much doubt it. All these scenarios tend to presume a one off investment and what happens subsequently. To my knowledge there are no indexes that cover the return of a fixed amount each month over any time frame. Which is what 90% of people actually do when saving. There are quite a few gaps in most of the indexes.

Go for it
July 31, 2025

Great article.
Put money in when you have the money
Take money out when you need the money.
Feel you don’t know what you’re doing? Use ETF’s. And take the stocking out of it.

Jeremy Campbell
August 01, 2025

Rubbish. The old old lies damn lies and statistics approach. Not so funny how these articles appear at market highs as the bubble blowers seek to pull in the last of the dumb money while cashing out themselves. My view (which is worthless) is that the market will push higher from here, but there will be a major correction down the track which will hurt those who pour money in now without regard to value. When? If I (or anyone) could accurately time that they would be on a beach somewhere enjoying life, not writing pieces,or comments, like this.

Ian Radbone
August 01, 2025

What's your evidence that the article is rubbish?

Richie H
August 02, 2025

I agree, investing fresh money now would be interesting to say the least. How much more upside does this market have? 10-20%.. I understand DCA would change your average purchase price a little and thats fine. But fresh bulk cash, wait for the 30-40% down. There's only a couple of days a year where most of your returns are made and it's not when the market frothing more than a fat kid in a cake shop. And TRUMP, wow, just wow!

Mark
August 04, 2025

I would really be interested if the same applies to the Australian market given that we haven't run so hard after the last few years. Is there some analysis on this?

James Gruber
August 04, 2025

Hi Mark,

I'd love to have the data but don't.

I will pass it on to a few of our quant-focused sponsors and see if they would like to do it.

James

allan
August 04, 2025

What I miss in all this analysis is the retiree who is drawing down from these assets at both highs and lows of the market. This analysis is based on leaving the funds untouched for long periods of time.

Harry
August 05, 2025

Should’ve started investing when you got your first job pumping gas at the local Esso station!

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Where to hide in the ‘everything bubble’

What do 11 stock market crises over 148 years tell us?

Redefining risk for income investors

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.