Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 622

Investing at market peaks: The surprising truth

After crashing hard in April, the US stock market rebounded even harder, recently hitting a new all-time high. This has left many investors feeling nervous about the potential for a fall.

Many others have parked savings in cash, attracted by the high rates on offer. The thought of investing that cash-on-the-sidelines when the stock market is at an all-time high feels uncomfortable. But should it?

The conclusion from our analysis of stock market returns since 1926 is unequivocal: no.

The market is actually at an all-time high more often than you might think. Of the 1,187 months since January 1926, the market was at an all-time high in 363 of them, 31% of the time.

And, on average, 12-month returns following an all-time high being hit have been better than at other times: 10.4% ahead of inflation compared with 8.8% when the market wasn’t at a high. Returns on a two or three-year horizon have been similar regardless of whether the market was at an all-time high or not (see chart below).

Figure 1: Returns have been higher if you invested when the stock market was at an all-time high than when it wasn’t
Average inflation-adjusted returns for US large cap equities, p.a.

Differences compound over time

$100 invested in the US stock market in January 1926 would be worth $103,294 at the end of 2024 in inflation-adjusted terms, growth of 7.3% a year. In contrast, a strategy which switched out of the market and into cash for the next month whenever the market hit an all-time high (and went back in again whenever it wasn’t at one) would only be worth $9,922 (Figure 2). This is 90% lower! The return on this portfolio would have been 4.8% in inflation-adjusted terms. Over long time horizons, differences in returns can seriously add up.

Figure 2: Selling stocks whenever the market was at an all-time high would have destroyed 90% of your wealth in the very long-run
Growth of $100, inflation-adjusted terms

This analysis covers a nearly 100-year time horizon, longer than most people plan for. But, even over shorter horizons, investors would have missed out on a lot of potential wealth if they had taken fright whenever the market was riding high (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Selling stocks whenever the market was at an all-time high would have destroyed 90% of your wealth in the very long-run
Growth of $100, inflation-adjusted terms

Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated.
Data January 1926-December 2024. Y-axis is a logarithmic scale. Switching strategy moves into cash for the next month whenever the previous month-end was an all-time high, and is invested in stocks whenever it wasn’t. Results exclude transaction costs. Stocks represented by Ibbotson® SBBI® US Large-Cap Stocks, Cash by Ibbotson® US (30-day) Treasury Bills. Source: Morningstar Direct, accessed via CFA Institute and Schroders.

Conclusion? Don’t fret over all-time highs

It is normal to feel nervous about investing when the stock market is at an all-time high, but history suggests that giving in to that feeling would have been very damaging for your wealth. There may be valid reasons for you to dislike stocks. But the market being at an all-time high should not be one of them.

 

Duncan Lamont, CFA is Head of Strategic Research at Schroder Investment Management Australia. This material is general information only and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Schroders does not give any warranty as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of information which is contained in this material. Read the full report and important disclaimers here.

For more articles and papers from Schroders, click here.

 

  •   30 July 2025
  • 11
  •      
  •   
11 Comments
John Derry
July 31, 2025

What about in the context of highest percentile valuations? That usually paints a different picture.

Z Nut
July 31, 2025

Thank you for this insightful analysis.
I’m curious how the findings might apply in a scenario like this:
Suppose someone has been consistently investing a fixed monthly amount into ASX:VTS over the past few years. Now, without selling their existing VTS holdings, they continue investing the same monthly amount into ASX:VEQ instead (based on the view that European equities appear less overvalued than U.S. ones).
Has anyone explored how this kind of regional rotation strategy performs over time?

Steve
August 01, 2025

Very much doubt it. All these scenarios tend to presume a one off investment and what happens subsequently. To my knowledge there are no indexes that cover the return of a fixed amount each month over any time frame. Which is what 90% of people actually do when saving. There are quite a few gaps in most of the indexes.

Go for it
July 31, 2025

Great article.
Put money in when you have the money
Take money out when you need the money.
Feel you don’t know what you’re doing? Use ETF’s. And take the stocking out of it.

Jeremy Campbell
August 01, 2025

Rubbish. The old old lies damn lies and statistics approach. Not so funny how these articles appear at market highs as the bubble blowers seek to pull in the last of the dumb money while cashing out themselves. My view (which is worthless) is that the market will push higher from here, but there will be a major correction down the track which will hurt those who pour money in now without regard to value. When? If I (or anyone) could accurately time that they would be on a beach somewhere enjoying life, not writing pieces,or comments, like this.

Ian Radbone
August 01, 2025

What's your evidence that the article is rubbish?

Richie H
August 02, 2025

I agree, investing fresh money now would be interesting to say the least. How much more upside does this market have? 10-20%.. I understand DCA would change your average purchase price a little and thats fine. But fresh bulk cash, wait for the 30-40% down. There's only a couple of days a year where most of your returns are made and it's not when the market frothing more than a fat kid in a cake shop. And TRUMP, wow, just wow!

Mark
August 04, 2025

I would really be interested if the same applies to the Australian market given that we haven't run so hard after the last few years. Is there some analysis on this?

James Gruber
August 04, 2025

Hi Mark,

I'd love to have the data but don't.

I will pass it on to a few of our quant-focused sponsors and see if they would like to do it.

James

allan
August 04, 2025

What I miss in all this analysis is the retiree who is drawing down from these assets at both highs and lows of the market. This analysis is based on leaving the funds untouched for long periods of time.

Harry
August 05, 2025

Should’ve started investing when you got your first job pumping gas at the local Esso station!

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Where to hide in the ‘everything bubble’

What do 11 stock market crises over 148 years tell us?

Redefining risk for income investors

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

2 billion reasons to fix retirement income

A proposal to address Australia's 'stranded balances' in retirement by requiring super funds to transition members to pension phase at 65, boosting retirement income and reframing super as a source of income.

The ultimate superannuation EOFY checklist 2026

Here is a checklist of 28 important issues you should address before June 30 to ensure your SMSF or other super fund is in order and that you are making the most of the strategies available.

Do super funds need a massive wake up call?

UK retirement expert, Guy Opperman, believes super funds are failing at supporting members in deaccumulation. Here is what Australia should do about it. 

Two months into retirement

A retirement researcher's take on retirement and her focus on each of her six resource buckets to stay engaged during the transition and beyond.

Reforming the taxation of wealth and wealth transfers

As the budget approaches debate continues about the need and method for addressing wealth inequality. Could reinstating wealth transfer taxes be the answer?

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 662 with weekend update

The debate over the budget is increasingly shaped by frustration and perceptions of unfairness, rather than clear-eyed assessment of policy outcomes.

Latest Updates

Back to the future - Why indexing CGT is a good idea

A return to indexation of capital gains would be a fairer way to compensate households for the effects of inflation than the current discount. Importantly, it opens the door to future, broader reforms to stop the taxation of inflation.

Australia has no death duties. Technically.

Australia may not levy formal death duties, but a growing web of tax measures is quietly shaping what wealth passes between generations. Now, the 2026 budget adds another layer.

Strategy

The folly of the Iran war

From oil shocks to fractured alliances, the Iran war carries the hallmarks of a historic policy misstep - one that could tip an already fragile global economy into crisis.

Taxation

Noel Whittaker’s take on the budget

Marketed as a fix for inequality and housing affordability, the latest budget instead delivers a tangle of tax changes that leave everyday Australians worse off.

Investment strategies

The red metal's long game

Copper has had a rough few weeks but investors should not ignore the potential for future price increases as supply increasingly falls behind demand.

Taxation

The lesser-known effects of changed property taxes

The budget’s property tax reforms are being framed as fairness measures, but they risk splitting the housing market, penalising lower‑income investors and introducing distortions that may prove costly.

Latest from Morningstar

Why stocks sometimes fall for no obvious reason

The vast and opaque world of private assets is a powerful gravitational force - and when trouble hits, it's the more liquid public equities that often the feel it first.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.