Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 622

Investing at market peaks: The surprising truth

After crashing hard in April, the US stock market rebounded even harder, recently hitting a new all-time high. This has left many investors feeling nervous about the potential for a fall.

Many others have parked savings in cash, attracted by the high rates on offer. The thought of investing that cash-on-the-sidelines when the stock market is at an all-time high feels uncomfortable. But should it?

The conclusion from our analysis of stock market returns since 1926 is unequivocal: no.

The market is actually at an all-time high more often than you might think. Of the 1,187 months since January 1926, the market was at an all-time high in 363 of them, 31% of the time.

And, on average, 12-month returns following an all-time high being hit have been better than at other times: 10.4% ahead of inflation compared with 8.8% when the market wasn’t at a high. Returns on a two or three-year horizon have been similar regardless of whether the market was at an all-time high or not (see chart below).

Figure 1: Returns have been higher if you invested when the stock market was at an all-time high than when it wasn’t
Average inflation-adjusted returns for US large cap equities, p.a.

Differences compound over time

$100 invested in the US stock market in January 1926 would be worth $103,294 at the end of 2024 in inflation-adjusted terms, growth of 7.3% a year. In contrast, a strategy which switched out of the market and into cash for the next month whenever the market hit an all-time high (and went back in again whenever it wasn’t at one) would only be worth $9,922 (Figure 2). This is 90% lower! The return on this portfolio would have been 4.8% in inflation-adjusted terms. Over long time horizons, differences in returns can seriously add up.

Figure 2: Selling stocks whenever the market was at an all-time high would have destroyed 90% of your wealth in the very long-run
Growth of $100, inflation-adjusted terms

This analysis covers a nearly 100-year time horizon, longer than most people plan for. But, even over shorter horizons, investors would have missed out on a lot of potential wealth if they had taken fright whenever the market was riding high (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Selling stocks whenever the market was at an all-time high would have destroyed 90% of your wealth in the very long-run
Growth of $100, inflation-adjusted terms

Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated.
Data January 1926-December 2024. Y-axis is a logarithmic scale. Switching strategy moves into cash for the next month whenever the previous month-end was an all-time high, and is invested in stocks whenever it wasn’t. Results exclude transaction costs. Stocks represented by Ibbotson® SBBI® US Large-Cap Stocks, Cash by Ibbotson® US (30-day) Treasury Bills. Source: Morningstar Direct, accessed via CFA Institute and Schroders.

Conclusion? Don’t fret over all-time highs

It is normal to feel nervous about investing when the stock market is at an all-time high, but history suggests that giving in to that feeling would have been very damaging for your wealth. There may be valid reasons for you to dislike stocks. But the market being at an all-time high should not be one of them.

 

Duncan Lamont, CFA is Head of Strategic Research at Schroder Investment Management Australia. This material is general information only and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Schroders does not give any warranty as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of information which is contained in this material. Read the full report and important disclaimers here.

For more articles and papers from Schroders, click here.

 

  •   30 July 2025
  • 11
  •      
  •   
11 Comments
John Derry
July 31, 2025

What about in the context of highest percentile valuations? That usually paints a different picture.

Z Nut
July 31, 2025

Thank you for this insightful analysis.
I’m curious how the findings might apply in a scenario like this:
Suppose someone has been consistently investing a fixed monthly amount into ASX:VTS over the past few years. Now, without selling their existing VTS holdings, they continue investing the same monthly amount into ASX:VEQ instead (based on the view that European equities appear less overvalued than U.S. ones).
Has anyone explored how this kind of regional rotation strategy performs over time?

Steve
August 01, 2025

Very much doubt it. All these scenarios tend to presume a one off investment and what happens subsequently. To my knowledge there are no indexes that cover the return of a fixed amount each month over any time frame. Which is what 90% of people actually do when saving. There are quite a few gaps in most of the indexes.

Go for it
July 31, 2025

Great article.
Put money in when you have the money
Take money out when you need the money.
Feel you don’t know what you’re doing? Use ETF’s. And take the stocking out of it.

Jeremy Campbell
August 01, 2025

Rubbish. The old old lies damn lies and statistics approach. Not so funny how these articles appear at market highs as the bubble blowers seek to pull in the last of the dumb money while cashing out themselves. My view (which is worthless) is that the market will push higher from here, but there will be a major correction down the track which will hurt those who pour money in now without regard to value. When? If I (or anyone) could accurately time that they would be on a beach somewhere enjoying life, not writing pieces,or comments, like this.

Ian Radbone
August 01, 2025

What's your evidence that the article is rubbish?

Richie H
August 02, 2025

I agree, investing fresh money now would be interesting to say the least. How much more upside does this market have? 10-20%.. I understand DCA would change your average purchase price a little and thats fine. But fresh bulk cash, wait for the 30-40% down. There's only a couple of days a year where most of your returns are made and it's not when the market frothing more than a fat kid in a cake shop. And TRUMP, wow, just wow!

Mark
August 04, 2025

I would really be interested if the same applies to the Australian market given that we haven't run so hard after the last few years. Is there some analysis on this?

James Gruber
August 04, 2025

Hi Mark,

I'd love to have the data but don't.

I will pass it on to a few of our quant-focused sponsors and see if they would like to do it.

James

allan
August 04, 2025

What I miss in all this analysis is the retiree who is drawing down from these assets at both highs and lows of the market. This analysis is based on leaving the funds untouched for long periods of time.

Harry
August 05, 2025

Should’ve started investing when you got your first job pumping gas at the local Esso station!

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Where to hide in the ‘everything bubble’

What do 11 stock market crises over 148 years tell us?

Redefining risk for income investors

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.