Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 507

Survey responses: French v Aussie reaction to pension age

A summary of our survey results and additional comments is provided below, with the full version linked here.

Why have Australians and French people reacted differently to increasing the eligibility age for pensions?

The main themes explaining French and Australian reactions to changes in pension eligibility ages include cultural differences, prior history of fighting for rights and freedoms, each country’s existing retirement and taxation systems and the perceived fairness/unfairness of the change.

  • It’s more about Macron and the political landscape than about the retirement age.
  • French people are used to the age pension starting a lot earlier. No one probably has tried to increase the eligibility age at all and this was a shock. Australians have become conditioned to increases in the eligibility age.
  • Ours has been increased gradually over time. France went from 65 to 60 and are now battling to raise it back up. 
  • Largely national character. Australians are mostly accepting of change and more moderate in response, coupled with often debt being carried into near retirement age, necessitating working longer anyway. The French are more passionate, expressive, and volatile by nature. Not a bad thing, just different, but it's historically how they react.
  • The French tend to have a negative view on many issues. Macron is actively disliked by most French people, but the other presidential choices were considered worse. French people have a history of being informed and more active in the expression of views than Australians who use terms like, 'the silent majority'. The French pension reform is more immediate than the Australian introduction to raise the eligibility age. It was not approved by parliament and was enacted using a special presidential power. Most French people will rely almost completely upon their govt. pension that they have financially contributed to unlike Aust. People in France tend to strongly believe that retirement life is very special after a more rigid employment system. Transitioning to retirement is not as common as Aust. I am Australian and have been living mostly in France/Switzerland since retirement over 6 years ago.
  • The French have a history of revolution and protest - it's part of their nature; not so for Aussies, or much less so.
  • Because the French pension system is "pay-as-you-go" they have paid directly for it so feel more entitled to its timing. Ours comes out of consolidated revenue so there is a lesser sense of entitlement.
  • A case was presented to the Australian people outlining the reasons for the increase. One reason being we can't afford to pay the pension to retirees from such a young age. It was a reasonable argument and made sense to most people.

Should the Government increase the JobSeeker rate to 90% of the age pension?

While more people answered ‘no’ to this question than ‘yes’, the comments reveal that many would still prefer to see an increase, but for a lesser amount. Some suggested a tiered approach, where there are larger payments to begin with to assist with job seeking, reducing in time to a more basic level. Another common concern was the need to avoid creating a disincentive to find work, while not leaving people to live in poverty.

  • JobSeeker is short-term welfare to bridge involuntary employment while the age pension is a long-term safety net for the aged.
  • There are expenses that are unavoidable on JobSeeker, such as a working mobile phone, internet and a computer to apply for jobs and lodge Centrelink forms, transport to interviews and decent interview clothes that those on a pension can avoid.
  • If age pensioners find it hard to live on the pension how can younger people get by on less?
  • My answer would be yes, provided it did not diminish the desire to look for a job.
  • The JobSeeker rate should be set to encourage people to return to the workforce. I would suggest a tiered payment system that reduces the longer you are using the supplement.
  • JobSeeker rules, requirements and dollar amount are criminal. More needs to be done about financial education in formative years so that as adults people stand a chance at achieving.
  • I really struggle to understand how anyone is on JobSeeker in 2023 when most businesses are crying out for reliable workers? I strongly suspect there is a large group who should be on a disability pension or more appropriate benefit for their circumstances with a very small cohort of diehard slackers who have no genuine intention of contributing to society and they don't deserve rewarding. Thus, has it always been.
  • The current level is insufficient for a basic standard of living.

Are Australians generally too complacent about the adverse impact on them of government policies?

Most respondents agreed that Australians are generally too complacent when it comes to government policy changes, but there were also those that were more pragmatic, reflecting on our governments being more ‘centre’ than far left or right, and that Australians pick their battles. Some policy changes are more palatable than others, and the ones that aren’t, are protested against (generally in a non-rioting way) or the party voted out next election.

  • Whilst the protest movement that characterised the 1970s has long gone, I wouldn't call us complacent. We simply respect an orderly society, and store up the pluses and minuses until we get to the ballot box.
  • Our political system of compulsory voting and proportional representation ensures politicians remain sensitive to the views of the electorate, of voters.
  • We understand both sides of the argument we don’t just think how does this affect me we also understand that some policies need to be changed because they are unsustainable in the long run.
  • Politics in Australia is very centrist, and policies don't differ too much between the main parties, so the majority of people can accept any initiative, regardless of the government of the day. European politics is far more a question of left or right / socialist or liberal.
  • Yes, sometimes. Despite many posthumous bad or average outcomes, the majority aren't prepared to get fully across the issues and determine the likely impact of policy changes. Much of it is maybe because of the type, course and nature of media consumed to stay ‘informed’. Nowadays, perhaps more than before the media can be extremely biased, often supporting or pushing a government agenda because their politics is aligned. Often all the facts or a balanced presentation are deliberately omitted.
  • This is a very broad question, but it is characteristic of Australians to trust authority and be prepared to contribute at some cost to themselves. This has social cohesion benefits by accepting 'the decision' while not really liking it.
  • It seems to vary considerably from issue to issue. I would love to understand why some changes in government policy attract aggressive responses while others are more muted. What drives the bandwagon effect?
  • We believe in Democracy so unless it's really ridiculous we accept it. Next election sorts them out.


Leisa Bell is Assistant Editor for Firstlinks. The views of our readers do not necessarily reflect those of Firstlinks.


May 07, 2023

I love France. It is the garden of Europe and incredibly beautiful as well as historic. I am not sure that I would want to live there, but it is great to visit. They eat well! I noticed President Macron and his wife as guests at the coronation yesterday, getting a glimpse of what France might have been like if Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette had not been guillotined in the revolution.
I can understand the French anger at their retirement plans being put aside just as they had planned to stop work. However both France and Australia and many other economically advanced countries are sitting on a time-bomb in demographics in that they are not having enough babies to replace their falling populations. The population balance is all wrong, with too few young people needing to support too many old people. Australia wants to make up for this by plundering the best and brightest from its poorer neighbors. The French do not want immigration at all. The challenge for both countries is not to put so many financial and other obstacles for young families having children, starting with housing.

May 04, 2023

I don't think the majority of Australians have a clue about how government policies affect them, totally unaware or simply don't care. But I am sure they know when money gets tight and they have to restrict their spending. Younger generation tend to get a lot of their information from Twitter and social media. I think critical analyses, debate and thinking is deficient and educational standards are falling. I am a great believer that life skills should be the core subject of the school curriculum with emphasis on budgeting, investing and relationships. I think we need a new political party made up of smart people making smart sensible policies not based on ideologies or buying votes.

David Williams
May 04, 2023

Thanks for a great analysis. Despite many positives in Australia, we are still far from where we could be as a community in responding to increasing longevity. The centrist nature of our politics also inhibits our political ability to move far in making important changes – like the boiling frog syndrome, we drift towards nasty outcomes without much response until the crisis hits. We are going through this in all the areas which are supposed to respond to the fastest growing demographic – over 65s.
To anticipate are well as co-ordinate an effective response, we need a National Longevity Strategy which harmonises all the silos of response – including Treasury, Social Security, Employment, Health, and Aged Care. This should identify and supervise the wisest initiatives and responses (including incentives). It should prepare the community from middle age to make the best personal choices as they begin to acknowledge their mortality and focus on making the best of the rest of their lives.
It would also simplify and properly inform professionals in health, financial advice, estate planning and other support services. Their harmonised activities would be more efficient and effective – further savings?
Likely investment cost – small. Likely longevity bonus for all – huge. No brainer?

May 04, 2023

The comment about Australia being very centrist reminded me of a comment from Malcolm Turnbull not long after he returned to Australia from the US after he was rolled as PM. He was asked if he thought Australia might become more polarized like the US and he made the observation that compulsory voting acted to pull parties back to the centre. In the US and possibly other countries with optional voting, parties tend to appeal to their "base" and focus on turnout. This leads to more extreme policies on both sides (look at Labour in the last UK election!!). However as Turnbull noted, to win in Australia, where about 90% of people vote, you cannot abandon the centre. Look at how far to the left Shorten and Bowen tried to go (presuming they had a win in the bag); they lost as they strayed too far left. Next election, Labor go out with a more centrist, but still left leaning set of policies and romp in. The Liberals in contrast seem intent on moving further right. Not the first time they have ignored Malcolm Turnbull to their ultimate political cost.......


Leave a Comment:



What the weekly polls revealed in 2014


Most viewed in recent weeks

11 ASX dividend stocks for the next decade

What are the best stocks to own that can pay regular dividends and beat indices on a total return basis in the long-term? Here is our list of 11 ASX-listed companies that could help investors achieve these goals.

2024/25 super thresholds – key changes and implications

The ATO has released all the superannuation rates and thresholds that will apply from 1 July 2024. Here's what’s changing and what’s not, and some key considerations and opportunities in the lead up to 30 June and beyond.

Time to smash the retirement nest egg - but how?

For decades, governments told people to save for retirement, then hold onto their nest eggs. Now, they're concerned that retirees aren't spending enough. How can we encourage reasonable spending patterns in retirement?

The greatest investor you’ve never heard of

Jim Simons has achieved breathtaking returns of 62% p.a. over 33 years, a track record like no other, yet he remains little known to the public. Here’s how he’s done it, and the lessons that can be applied to our own investing.

Five months on from cancer diagnosis

Life has radically shifted with my brain cancer, and I don’t know if it will ever be the same again. After decades of writing and a dozen years with Firstlinks, I still want to contribute, but exactly how and when I do that is unclear.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 552 with weekend update

Being rich is having a high-paying job and accumulating fancy houses and cars, while being wealthy is owning assets that provide passive income, as well as freedom and flexibility. Knowing the difference can reframe your life.

  • 21 March 2024

Latest Updates


The challenges of retirement aren’t just financial

Debates about retirement tend to focus on the financial aspects: income, tax, estates, wills, and the like. Less attention is paid to the psychological challenges of retirement, which can often be more demanding.


Is Australia ready for its population growth over the next decade?

Australia will have 3.7 million more people in a decade's time, though the growth won't be evenly distributed. Over 85s will see the fastest growth, while the number of younger people will barely rise. 


The mixed fortunes of tax reform in Australia, part 1

While there have been numerous tax reviews at the Commonwealth and state levels, most have not resulted directly in substantive tax reforms. This two-part series looks at that history and explores the pathway forward. 

Investment strategies

America, the world's new energy superpower

The US has become the world's new energy superpower, combining production, technology and capital in a way never previously achieved – a development sure to have global implications for decades to come.

Investment strategies

Could Korean corporate reform trigger a Japan-style market rally?

Corporate governance reforms in Japan have helped spur a 45% rise in the share market over the past 12 months. Korea looks set to follow the Japanese reform playbook, and may be poised for a similar bounce.


How AI will transform the real estate sector

The real estate industry, traditionally characterised by its cautious adoption of new technologies, is now at a pivotal juncture. The emergence of AI promises to fundamentally change the way we live, work, and play.

Investment strategies

Charitable giving and tax deductions

With impending Stage 3 tax cuts incentivising taxpayers to bring forward future tax deductions while tax rates are higher, it’s a good time to explore how to bolster your tax savings and community impact through structured giving.



© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.