Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 495

Why a $5 coin and not a $5 note repays public debt

Over 30 years ago we published an academic paper explaining how the replacement of the $2 note with the $2 coin in June 1988 had led to a short-term reduction in the Commonwealth Government’s recorded budget deficit. The reason was the budgetary accounting treatment of the seigniorage profit to the Mint from creating coins compared to when the Reserve Bank (RBA) prints notes.

We doubt many people have ever read that paper. It’s an arcane topic and the title (typical of academic papers of the time, or maybe reflecting our lack of imagination) was hardly ‘sexy’. But the analysis there explains why today’s government, with a massive budget deficit (and a recent change of monarch) might find introducing a $5 coin attractive.

What is seigniorage, other than a lovely word?

Seigniorage is the profit the government makes from producing fiat money (notes and coins) at close to zero cost. The public is willing to accept these in exchange for supplying the government with labour, goods and services, or assets etc of equal nominal amount. Wouldn’t we all like to create such a ‘money machine’ (and the explosion of cryptocurrencies reflects attempts by their promoters to do so).

So, if the Mint, a part of the Government, makes a $5 coin at virtually zero cost, when that coin is put into circulation, its profit of $5 is treated as revenue to the Government, reducing the budget deficit in that year. In contrast, if the RBA puts an additional $5 note into circulation (also at virtually zero cost) that is treated as a financing item, i.e., a liability in the RBA’s accounts.

Because the RBA is 100% owned by the Commonwealth Government, that $5 note is then effectively treated in the budgetary accounting as a component of Australia’s ‘national debt’. This is hard to spot because the RBA’s balance sheet is never published on a consolidated basis with that of its 100% owner.

A $5 coin would reduce public debt

This means that when a $5 note is taken out of circulation and replaced by a $5 coin, the $5 profit made on the coin is effectively treated as a reduction in the national debt through the cancellation of the note. In today’s budgetary situation, the latter effect is a $5 reduction in the recorded government borrowing requirement rather than a ‘redemption’ of public sector debt.

If, however, new $5 coins simply replace the public’s holdings of old coins of lower denominations, this budgetary effect does not occur. The same applies if reduced holdings (and use) of $5 notes outside the RBA are matched by increased holdings (and use) of higher denomination notes.

Will the government want to take this step? One perhaps minor consideration would be that the coins would have the image of King Charles on them while the existing notes (many of which would continue to circulate for some years) would feature Queen Elizabeth. Those who don’t want to see the Queen replaced by the new King on the notes might be diverted! The Royal Australian Mint says:

"Q. Who will be on Australia’s new coins?

A. The obverse of Australian coins are struck with an image of the reigning Sovereign.

Q. When will a new effigy appear on our coins?

A. Arrangements for the King Charles III effigy are still being finalised by the Australian Government."

The impact of inflation

Another consideration is that inflation since the $2 coin was introduced might mean it is time. The Consumer Price Index for 31 December 2022 is just over 130. In 1988 when the $2 coin was introduced it was around 50. So a $5 note (or new $5 coin) would be worth about the same in real terms as the $2 coin was at the time of its introduction.

Today’s circumstances mean it is more relevant that there is the opportunity for the Government to have an additional contribution to reducing the recorded budget deficit. There are today over 200 million $5 notes in circulation with an aggregate value of over $1 billion. Assuming that the Mint produced, and ‘sold’, that value of coins in one year, the recorded Government revenue (and budget deficit) for that year could increase (and decrease) respectively by that amount. It would probably be in the Government’s interest to spread the effect over two years, as happened with the $2 coin.

Do we even want coins?

Of course, whether the public would want to accept that amount of new $5 coins is problematic. Unless there was a compulsory exchange requirement (or equivalently by making $5 notes no longer legal tender by some date) it is not clear what the public demand to obtain and use such coins would be.

The public is continually moving away from physical money into electronic transactions, and in any event a $5 coin would seem likely to be regarded by many as less convenient than a $5 note. It would be well worth assessing whether the populace would appreciate such a change. Also, many may currently prefer to maintain the Queen’s image on the notes, although that preference may decline over time.

Long live the King ... and Queen

We learnt recently that King Charles III will not feature on the new $5 note, and the new design will tribute to 'the culture and history' of First Nations people, the RBA says. Perhaps a middle road which maximises ‘freedom of choice’ would make sense since having the monarch’s image on our currency is only a tradition and not a legal requirement. That could involve introducing the $5 coin (with the King’s image) while allowing the existing notes (with the Queen`s image) to remain in use and keeping the circulation in ‘good repair’ by replacing damaged and worn-out notes with new replacements, as per the RBA’s standard practice.


Owen Covick is a Research Associate at the South Australian Centre for Economic Studies, and Kevin Davis is Emeritus Professor of Finance at The University of Melbourne. Kevin’s free e-text reference book 'Bank and Financial Institution Management in Australia' is available on his website. Kevin was also a member of the Financial Systems Inquiry ('The Murray Report') in 2014.


Dave Roberts
February 13, 2023

When are we going to get real. Charles is not KCiii of Australia he is KC I Remember when the Queen was officially made Queen of Australia . We should have called her QE I. The Scots were more clever than us. No QE I on their postboxes, only QE.

February 12, 2023

Seigniorage can also be considered the forgone interest on fiat money.

For instance, if you have a $20 note in your wallet, you are not earning any interest on that note ... so this begs the question "who is"?

The answer is that the RBA is, they are getting an interest free loan from the holder of the note. The $20 note in your wallet represents an interest free loan from yourself to the RBA. The profit on that interest free loan is called seigniorage .

February 10, 2023

Yes, introduce $5 coin and get rid of 5c, 20c, $2, reduce size of 50c, and get rid of $20.
So end up with 10c, 50c, $1, $5, $10, $50, $100.

February 10, 2023

What is a $5 note? What is a coin?

Are they in my Apple Wallet?

February 09, 2023

A bit off topic. You guys have probably already seen it anyway.
Cash avoids the banks clipping the transactions each time with digital card fees.
After say a trail of about 30 transactions, and taking $50- as an example; it is now only worth about $5-.
Most of the value is now with the bank !!
Whereas if a $50 note is used instead, it is still worth $50- !!

February 10, 2023

These days, some outlets even charge you a transaction fee when you use eftpos direct debit from the savings account.

Next time I bring cash and make sure I come with the smallest denominations they are legally bound to accept.

john flynne
February 09, 2023

To do that would require some rational thought not a pop agenda


Leave a Comment:



Superannuation funds should be long-term lenders

Questions remain on legislating the objective of superannuation

Six ways the Budget Office is probing super taxes


Most viewed in recent weeks

Australians unprepared for $3.5 trillion wealth transfer

A new report suggests that Australians are ill prepared for the largest intergenerational wealth handover in history. It's estimated $3.5 trillion in assets will be transferred from Baby Boomers to their children by 2050.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 534 with weekend update

Many people in the Firstlinks community have been reading my articles and editorials for 10 years or more, and worked with me for decades before that, and deserve an explanation for why I have suddenly stopped writing each week.

  • 9 November 2023

18 rules for ageing well

The rules to age successfully include, 'the unexamined life lasts longer', 'change no more than one-eighth of your life at a time', 'nobody is thinking about you', and 'pursue virtue but don’t sweat it'.

Why the ASX 200 has gone nowhere in 16 years

The ASX 200 is around the same price that it was 16 years ago. The poor long-term performance can be largely blamed on our taxation system, which encourages companies to pay out most of their earnings as dividends.

The challenges of building a lazy portfolio

John Bogle famously advocated a two-fund portfolio of US stocks and bonds. Recently, I tried to create an Australian version of the Bogle portfolio and found that what seems simple can quickly turn complicated.

SAPTO and LITO, or do you really need an SMSF?

Money withdrawn from super after age 60 is tax-free but less understood are arrangements that allows a couple over the age of 67 to earn up to $57,948 per year outside super and pay no tax with LITO and SAPTO.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Two proven ways to make big money in markets

Many ASX success stories – like JB Hi-Fi, Lovisa, and AUB – have followed one of two strategies: rolling out single store formats nationwide or consolidating fragmented industries. Here are the secrets behind these business models.

Investment strategies

The bank is still a terrible place to put your money

With the RBA having lifted interest rates by 4.25% over 18 months, many investors now see cash as an attractive investment option. That ignores the silent tax of inflation, which makes other assets better investment alternatives.

Little to fear from APRA's hybrids review

APRA's objections to hybrids are misplaced. If the regulator wants more safety in our banking system, it will come at the expense of effectiveness, and that's why wholesale changes to the hybrid market are unlikely.

Investment strategies

Rates higher = shares lower… is it that simple?

Typically, higher interest rates are associated with lower share market valuations, but not always and the relationship hasn’t been that strong over the long term. Company fundamentals will matter more over the next few years.

Investment strategies

Diversification is not a free lunch

Harry Markowitz said that “diversification is the only free lunch in investing” as holding a broader range of assets can result in better returns without assuming more risk. This has become accepted wisdom - but it isn't true.


Why Asia remains one of the world's best growth stories

China’s economic slowdown and the resilience of the US dollar have dimmed the lustre of many Asian economies’ strong growth momentum in the past year. But heading into 2024, Asia's growth story should reignite.

Podcast: Property picks, PE update, and Warnes on Michelle Bullock

Charter Hall's Steven Bennett talks through commercial property's challenges and opportunities, Schroders' Rainer Ender on private equity's bright spots, and Peter Warnes on how RBA hawkishness will impact rates and the economy.



© 2023 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.