Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 215

8 ways long-term investing is rewarded

There is no denying that we live in a world of short-termism. From the 24-hour news cycle and daily market moves to the relentless focus on the latest set of company earnings, we are always grappling with new information flooding our way. We often overtrade as we become impatient and feel the need for action. This begs the question, does the market reward the active managers and other investors who can sit tight and invest with a long-term lens?

A report by the Thinking Ahead Institute (part of Willis Towers Watson) called 'The search for a long-term premium' explores this question and offers interesting insights. The study identifies eight fundamental building blocks of long-term value creation. These factors can be categorised in two broad camps:

  • Strategies that provide long-horizon return opportunities
  • Strategies that lead to lower long-term costs and/or mitigate risks

Long-horizon return opportunities

1. Active ownership and investing in long-term oriented companies

Research by McKinsey has found that firms create value by taking a long-term approach. Investors can exploit this in two main ways. The first is that skilful investors can identify and own companies who have a genuine long-term focus. Alternatively, investors can engage with companies they own to improve performance. The research suggests investors can expect to harvest an additional 2.3% abnormal return the following year.

A further study analyses the 183 companies CalPERS has actively engaged with between 1999 and 2012. Three years prior to the engagement, these companies underperformed the Russell 1000 Index by 38.9% on a cumulative basis. In the five years following CalPERS’ engagement, on average, these firms generated cumulative returns of 12.3% above the index.

2. Liquidity provision

Long-term investors can act as providers of liquidity in times of market distress. By providing liquidity when it is most needed, investors can harvest a premium of 1% per annum. When investors require liquidity, they sell at below fair value while long-term investors can exploit this through purchasing at below fair value with cash held in reserve. Further, long-term investors who provide liquidity serve a social good as it helps stabilise markets in volatile times.

3. Capturing systematic mispricing

Exposure to smart beta strategies can help generate an additional excess return of 1.5% per annum. Rob Arnott of Research Affiliates found that all alternative weighting strategies have outperformed the cap-weighted benchmark over the long term. This may be a consequence of unintended value and small-cap tilts which are often unavoidable unless one holds a portfolio that has a positive relationship between price and portfolio weights (such as a cap weighted index).

4. Illiquidity premium

The illiquidity risk premium (IRP) estimated at between 0.5% and 2% per annum can be harvested through exposure to long-term illiquid assets. As investors invest in these illiquid assets, they demand a higher risk premium for their inability to quickly sell down their assets as needed.

5. Thematic investing

Themes are often easy to identify but the scale and rate of change is difficult to anticipate. The world is running out of oil, renewable energy can save the planet, many countries have ageing populations and technology is changing our lives. However, such investments are often neglected as they are hard to time, particularly when investing with a short-term lens. While there is no empirical evidence supporting that thematic investing generates excess return, 93% of the 2016 Institute of New York roundtable attendees believe thematic investing to be value enhancing.

6. Avoiding buying high and selling low

Investors typically sell winners and hold onto losers. As a stock performs well, we want a piece of the action, while when a stock performs poorly, we hold on and hope for a recovery. We typically end up buying high and selling low. Jason Hsu found that mutual fund investors have forgone 1.9% per year due to poor timing decisions. Short-term trading can at times be a mug’s game.

Cost reduction and loss mitigation strategies

7. Avoiding forced sales

Investment funds often engage in short-term trading driven by liquidity needs. In particular, redemptions can result in ‘fire sales’ where managers are forced to sell assets below fair value, destroying value in the process. One study has found that liquidity-driven trading in response to mutual fund flows reduced abnormal returns in US open-ended mutual funds by 1.5% to 2% per annum. A second study found the cost to be 112 bps per annum. While closed-fund structures have limitations, forced selling can result in value destruction.

8. Lower transaction costs

Willis Towers Watson’s ‘UK Food Chain’ study estimates the size of each component of fund expenses based on a medium-sized UK pension fund. Transaction costs account for 44 bps, or almost half of all fund expenses, as shown below.

Components of fund expenses

In addition, the next figure shows that reduced turnover levels can substantially reduce transaction costs, significantly improving investment outcomes.

How reduced turnover leads to lower transaction costs

Note it is not appropriate to sum the return potential of the eight building blocks, which would yield an incremental return of approximately 10%, as these factors are correlated.

A snapshot of additional incremental returns

Bringing together all eight factors, the table below presents potential benefits for a large asset owner investing with a long-horizon approach. The Thinking Ahead Institute observes this investment approach yields a potential incremental return of 1.5% per annum over the long run.

To put this into perspective, a $50,000 portfolio invested for 20 years returning 6.5% per annum would net a healthy $176,000. However, a return of 8% per annum would turn $50,000 into a whopping $233,000. What a difference a few percentage points can make in the world of compounding.

There is a strong belief that a long-term premium exists. The challenge, of course, is to harvest it.

 

Wilbur Li has worked at Yarra Capital Management (fixed income), PwC (debt and fixed income) and Unisuper (global equities).

 

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.