Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 282

6 checks on whether acquisitions create value

In the current economic environment many companies are finding it difficult to grow earnings organically so they are turning to acquisitions more frequently. Adding further incentive for management teams to acquire businesses is the disparity between the valuation of an ASX-listed public company and a private company. This can create an opportunity for valuation arbitrage as a listed company is generally valued at a greater multiple. When earnings of a private company are added, they benefit from applying the public company multiple.

However, acquisitions are often unsuccessful, and worryingly we don’t see many management teams providing a track record of these in their annual reports. Here are some factors we look for when assessing the potential value of an acquisition:

1. Why is the company making the acquisition?

Too often we see only the strategic merits touted, but we need to discover the underlying motivation. If management is diluting earnings ratios in their existing business with a new one, then we need to know what benefits this new business will provide to the existing business. This is particularly important with larger acquisitions relative to the company’s existing size.

2. Is there organic growth in the existing business?

Always identify the organic earnings growth within the existing business. This is particularly pertinent where companies are making such frequent acquisitions that they are considered a ‘roll-up’. If the company is not growing organically, then inevitably all good things will come to an end when the acquisition pipeline dries up.

3. Are acquisition prices increasing?

Acquisition prices can tell you a lot about the opportunity available. If a company has made several acquisitions in the same industry and the prices for those acquisitions increase each time, this can be a sign of management becoming desperate to acquire when faced with a lack of opportunities.

4. Are accounting levers being pulled?

One benefit of an acquisition is the flexibility it provides management in relation to the accounts. There is opportunity to shift certain costs into what is called a ‘non-recurring’ item, but often these items are recurring. Acquisition accounting also gives companies a full 12 months to adjust the value of acquired assets and liabilities, meaning they can create certain provisions without dragging on the profitability of the business.

5. Is a contingent consideration in the price?

We often see a contingent consideration as part of an acquisition price, but this won’t be included in the headline price paid. Contingent considerations can be a great way to incentivise an existing management team, however, the details are not often disclosed. The accounting treatment for contingent consideration is also highly subjective as they are recognised at the present value of a likely future payment. Any adjustments to these figures are taken through the profit and loss which can result in a positive impact on profit and loss even if an acquisition is underperforming.

6. Where is the genuine value creation?

Finally, we need to look at how much value is being created by these acquisitions. Instead of simply looking at headline growth each year, we try to focus on the incremental profit growth in relation to the extra capital being employed by the business. This gives us a clearer view on whether the acquisition is actually working or if it is diminishing shareholder returns.

This is not an exhaustive list of items to consider, but rather some key considerations. There are numerous ways for a company to grow and in the current environment, acquisitions are proving popular. Not all acquisitions are bad, but more seem to go wrong than right. A management team which can allocate its capital effectively and continue to grow shareholder returns should see their share prices well rewarded over the longer term.

 

Ben Rundle is a Portfolio Manager at NAOS Asset Management. This material is provided for general information purposes only and must not be construed as investment advice. It does not take into account the investment objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular investor. Before making an investment decision, investors should consider obtaining professional investment advice that is tailored to their specific circumstances.

NAOS is a sponsor of Cuffelinks. For more articles and papers from NAOS, please click here.

 

  •   28 November 2018
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Two companies with clear competitive advantages.

Five actions to watch in management share buying

Three checks to make when facing earnings downgrades

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The strange effect of the 30% minimum capital gains tax

The 30% minimum tax on capital gains sits at the heart of the budget's proposed reforms. Yet the mechanics reveal anomalies that introduce unexpected distortions that raise questions about its design.

High quality businesses are on sale

Beneath the dominance of the ASX's largest stocks, much of the market has been left behind. High-quality companies are now trading at levels rarely seen, offering opportunities for investors willing to look deeper.

Does your will qualify for the discretionary testamentary trust exemption?

Treasury has confirmed the exemption many families were hoping for. But buried in the fine print are two conditions that could leave some wills on the wrong side of the exemption, despite years of careful planning.

Ranking three common retirement strategies

The defining challenge of retirement isn't just about building wealth, it's about converting your lifetime savings into sustainable income. A holistic understanding of different strategies can improve long-term outcomes.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 667 with weekend update

The downfall of the giant and three lessons for investors.

  • 18 June 2026

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Retirement

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

Taxation

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Investment strategies

The surprising beneficiaries of the AI boom

While markets obsess over AI winners, a larger, more predictable growth engine is forming. A surge in electricity demand and infrastructure build‑out reveals the quiet, durable assets evolving beneath the AI story.

Superannuation

When losses in super become irreplaceable

The notion of 'you can afford more risk' assumes that losses can be replaced. Above a $2.1 million super balance the law says otherwise, and a worked example shows the refill takes decades, or never happens.

Retirement

Why I object to ‘hitting a number’ for retirement

Many investors dream of “hitting their number” and walking into retirement. But what if reaching that milestone is the moment they should be asking the tough questions? After all, there's a lot more to life than a high portfolio value. 

Planning

Does your will qualify for the discretionary testamentary trust exemption?

Treasury has confirmed the exemption many families were hoping for. But buried in the fine print are two conditions that could leave some wills on the wrong side of the exemption, despite years of careful planning.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.