Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Actively navigating economic and geopolitical shocks

Michael J. Stephen Dover, CFA, Chief Market Strategist, Franklin Templeton Investment Institute

with Gene Podkaminer, CFA, Head of Research, Franklin Templeton Investment Solutions

Introduction

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has caused broad destruction and terrible turmoil on a humanitarian level. This has led to a series of shocks to the global economy and political order. At the Franklin Templeton Investment Institute, we seek to identify how these shocks might have persistent and significant impacts on the global economy, capital markets and long-term investment returns.

  • Russia’s invasion of Ukraine does not signal the end of globalization. We anticipate shifting sources of production and investment flows will result from today’s economic dislocations. Worldwide, countries will need to reconsider energy and food security risks. Trade and investment flows will shift, and how countries cope will have a large impact on future economic growth, the distribution of income, after-tax returns, inflation, interest rates, and political and financial stability in countries large and small. The implication is not de-globalization as much as it is re-globalization.
  • Global growth expectations are being reset downwards as uncertainty is permeating through businesses and consumers. While Western Europe’s proximity to the war puts it at greatest risk of stagflation, we do not expect conditions anywhere else in the world will trigger a combination of enduring stagnation and inflation.
  • Inflation remains elevated and is likely to be pushed higher by surging global energy and commodity prices due to war, sanctions and the threat of supply disruptions. Supply-led inflation is particularly concerning when it comes with an energy shock. Energy is used in many facets of the global economy from production through consumption. However, energy does not hit every sector equally. Will companies react quickly to inflation, and will they be able to pass on costs to consumers? Which countries might pick up the slack in commodity production?
  • For investors who’ve known nothing except low and stable inflation, this is a new world that creates volatility due to uncertainty. If one could make the case for active management, we think now would be the time. Heightened market correlations make achieving excess returns more challenging, and a wider dispersion of returns provides an opportunity for active managers to pick up alpha (above-market returns).

We will be monitoring the aforementioned factors closely as the year unfolds and wish peace to the people of Ukraine.

Download the full report


 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.