Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 637

The housing market is heading into choppy waters

My focus today is the housing market — I fear we’re sailing into dangerous waters.

Let’s start with interest rates. The Reserve Bank has spoken and, as widely predicted, rates are on hold — at least for now. But the big question is: where to next? I’m one of 32 so-called experts asked each month to forecast what the Reserve Bank will do at its upcoming meeting, and my forecast before that last meeting was no change. I guess I’ve got a different way of thinking to many of my cohorts. I don’t sit in an office studying graphs — I get out and talk to people.

Every employer I speak to, no matter what field they’re in, tells me the same thing: they can’t get staff. It’s especially bad in the building trade, where costs are going through the roof. According to Master Builders Australia, we’re short more than 200,000 tradies — and that gap won’t close any time soon.

Think about the Reserve Bank’s job. If the country is in trouble and needs stimulus, they’ll cut rates. If inflation is booming, they’ll hike them to try to slow things down. I don’t see any rate increases coming — not in the near term. But with things the way they are, there’s no way they’ll be cutting either. In fact, I’ll go so far as to say we may be at the bottom of the rate cycle, which means that last month’s cut may have been the last cut we’ll see for a long time.

Keeping in mind that house prices depend on supply and demand — and that supply is extremely limited — it’s obvious that demand is where we should be directing our thoughts. And it’s not good.

Adding fuel to the fire is the stimulus in the housing market created by the government’s first home buyer scheme, which allows people to buy with as little as a 5% deposit and no mortgage insurance. It’s well-intentioned, but it’s adding even more heat to an already overheated market. Every new incentive aimed at helping people into housing ends up increasing demand, which simply pushes prices higher.

Now think about the lenders

But there’s more to this dangerous mix — and think about what’s happening now in the lending area.

The banks are going gung-ho to lure borrowers directly to them and sidestep the mortgage-broking industry, keeping more of the profits for themselves. Commonwealth Bank has been advertising up to 300,000 Qantas Frequent Flyer points for new loans — enough to fly business class to Europe — and recently announced it’s prepared to offer extra borrowing capacity, up to $40,000 more, for applicants willing to rent out a room in their home to boost income. It’s clever marketing, but borrowers need to look past the shiny bonuses and ask whether the deal is really in their best interest.

40-year loans

At the same time, lending standards are slipping as competition intensifies. Great Southern Bank has joined non-bank lenders such as Pepper Money in offering 40-year mortgages. Extending a home loan from 30 to 40 years can make repayments look more manageable, but the cost is brutal. On an $800,000 loan at 5.5%, the monthly repayment is about $4,542 over 30 years (interest roughly $835,000) versus about $4,126 over 40 years (interest roughly $1.18 million). That’s around $345,000 extra interest for saving only $416 a month — and it risks people still paying the mortgage in their 60s or 70s, just when they should be thinking about retirement.

10-year interest-only loans

Even more concerning is AMP Bank’s new 10-year interest-only loan, which requires no reassessment of the borrower’s financial position during that period. It means borrowers can spend a decade paying only interest, building no equity and facing a sharp increase in repayments when principal payments begin. Without a mid-term review, there’s also no check on whether the property has held its value or the borrower can still afford to service the debt.

The warnings are coming

These products may make it easier to qualify for a loan, but they’re a step back from the more disciplined standards regulators fought hard to enforce. APRA has repeatedly warned lenders not to chase growth at the expense of prudence. It has long identified high loan-to-income ratios, extended terms, and lengthy interest-only periods as major red flags. The regulator insists banks maintain a serviceability buffer of at least three percentage points above the actual loan rate, to ensure borrowers can handle higher repayments, and it requires lenders to hold extra capital against riskier loans. The message from APRA is crystal clear: competition must not come at the expense of sound lending.

All this tells me we’re heading into choppy waters. The housing market is fuelled by emotion, and when confidence is high, people tend to take bigger risks. But history reminds us that easy money and loose lending standards always end the same way. If you’re thinking about buying or refinancing, take the time to run the numbers carefully — and don’t let bonus points or clever marketing cloud your judgment. As I’ve said many times before, wealth is built by keeping things simple and avoiding costly mistakes.

For borrowers, the lesson is equally clear. Don’t be seduced by offers of frequent-flyer points, small monthly repayments, or flashy new mortgage products. Always look at the total interest you’ll pay over the life of the loan, and think carefully about how long you want to stay in debt. The banks may be relaxing their standards — but you shouldn’t relax yours.

 

Noel Whittaker is the author of Making Money Made Simple and numerous other books on personal finance. His advice is general in nature and readers should seek their own professional advice before making any financial decisions. Email: [email protected].

 

  •   12 November 2025
  • 13
  •      
  •   
13 Comments
Allan Abrahams
November 13, 2025

Dear Noel,
You've only just touched on a small of the problem, and I will tell you why.
Can remember prior to the GFC and before government deregulated the banking system, if you wanted to borrowed money, you needed 20.0% deposit and 30.0% of your gross income was needed to service the debt.
Move forward to 2007 and potential borrowers could borrow 100.0% to buy a scarce resource (viz property)
In other words, with 10 people chasing one property, there was only one outcome, but at least 8/10 should never have got a loan, because "free" money was on offer from lending institutions.
And we saw how a lot of that played out during the GFC and subsequently Covid.

All this has exacerbated the demand on housing without any thought caused by the impact of unbridled immigration, chasing scarce supply.

I don't know why no one is talking about a return to regulated borrowing requirements except me.
If you think about it, it will take some of the heat out of the demand side and just maybe, housing prices may drop.

Like you I have done the figures on a $1m loan with the governments 5.0% deposit proposal in which a single person on $100,000 qualifies and a couple on an income on $130,000 qualifies.
I just wonder since I got the same figures on an $800,000 loan @5.5% the monthly repayments on a P& I loan are $4,542 per month and @ 5.3% drops to $4,420 per month.
What you didn't say is, that someone on $100,000 income has a net income after tax of around $80,000 p.a.
Who would be insane enough to lend this person money ?
And since mortgage payments are based on a parabolic curve and interest is capitalised up front, on a 30 year loan, after 15 years the borrowers still owe's 68.0% of the original amount borrowed.
What you didn't say is, that if borrower defaults say after 2 years on a $1m property and the mortgagee in possession sells the property for $900,000, the mortgagee takes $800,000, the government grabs the remaining $100,000 and the purchaser is left with nothing.
And the sting in the tail for all of this is, the government shares in any profit made on the property as part of their 15.0% equity if they are not paid out prior to any future sale.

In my view that this is Albanese's Australian version of a sub-prime accident waiting to happen.

11
Philip Rix
November 13, 2025

Noel always writes with such a simple and clear style which I enjoy reading - thank you for the contribution.

Q: Why is it that the RBA is asked to do so much of the policy adjustments to solve housing (ie interest rates)? Especially as 'housing' is not one of the RBA's mandated requirements (only inflation and 'full' employment).

I think APRA should now step up and tighten lending standards to INVESTORS to reduce demand for housing! From what I can see on the ground a significant portion of the demand for housing is coming from this cohort which is denying owner occupiers an opportunity.

Couldn't APRA require banks to lend to housing Investors at say, a higher interest rate or require higher deposit requirements thereby reducing the supply of credit to this group ...in turn reducing demand for housing.

But I can 'hear' your feedback already - "But Phil, if we don't have investors there won't be any new homes built ..... which will further reduce supply and push up prices!" This is where this policy could be refined and directed at Investors wishing to purchase established homes, still leaving the opportunity for Investors to build new homes and add to supply.

Just a thought ........

13
Robert G
November 16, 2025

You are not alone Allan,
Back in 1981 when we applied for our first housing loan, added to your list of regulated borrowing requirements was
- had to show a period of regular, solid saving
- only the husband's base income ( excluding bonuses, overtime etc etc) was used to determine the ability to repay a loan and the wife's income was not included ( she might get pregnant/ leave work etc )
Loose lending standards have a lot to answer for.

3
Steve
November 13, 2025

Spot on Noel. Does anyone from the Govt talk to you? All your points are clear and (hopefully) obvious, so why do the media always present every RBA meeting as another opportunity to cut rates? Why throw more fuel on the fire? Ditto all the so-called incentives. How about a few less unskilled migrants and few more tradies in the migrant intake (oh the construction unions want to keep labour tight to keep wages high, and we know who call the shots in a Labor govt...). And if there is some chop in the waters ahead and bad loans rise (as they should as I fear unemployment has to rise as the govt runs out of capacity to employ 80% of new workforce participants), then your worlds most expensive bank starts to look even more expensive. Lookout. But I do not expect a GFC style crash as at least our banks keep their loans on their books. The US banks/brokers tended to sell off loans as "packages" and didn't have as much skin in the game, they just wanted commission and didn't care much if the applicant actually had capacity to repay which was the root cause of their collapse. Plus other differences like non-recourse loans, but that's getting too distracted.

7
Adrian
November 16, 2025

Yes, a timely reminder about the U S banking system and its role in the GFC

Phil Pogson
November 13, 2025

I’m travelling the country slowly in our caravan after being made redundant .
I’ve observed the slow but steady move to regional Australia. It’s real and it’s happening. Full points for the young people who have the guts and foresight to do this.They building lives worth living.
Additionally I’ve observed the 100’s of thousand of miles of fencing and clearing of land regionally that would all have been done by the mighty strength of 20/30 year olds … I’m humbled and thankful for young hard workers then and now.

7
Bob
November 15, 2025

australian women have not had kids since the 70s so this is absolutely false.
the average age of many, many towns must be 60+.
very sad you barely see any small children. its over.

3
John B
November 16, 2025

Bob, you should come to Geelong - babies and young kids everywhere, often in prams pushed by young Dads. The new suburbs are growing rapidly. The playgrounds are full, but Mum and Dad drive the kids to the playgrounds because cars have taken over and it is not safe for children on the roads.

1
Geoff D
November 13, 2025

Couldn't agree more Noel. At the current rate of price increases it must surely reach a stage where homes become unaffordable and there have to be price reductions. In the meantime some homeowners are mortgaging themselves to the hilt while interest rates are so low. What will happen if rates start to rise again?

2
Errol
November 13, 2025

Great article Noel. As usual a sensible voice. Pity Government couldn’t do the same rather than inflating housing prices further through “vote catching let’s help first home owners” policies.

The 5% deposit scheme would seem to only benefit young professionals on high salaries but without a deposit wanting to purchase a home now. Others will be locked in to higher rate loans, more interest and could be a step away from disaster if financial circumstances adversely change or even negative equity if there is a pull back in prices.

First Home Owner Grants are I think a better option but still contribute to house price inflation. Some of these policies though are poorly thought out with unrealistic caps - e.g. in Brisbane to qualify for the grant, the property must essentially be a new build under $750k. There isn’t any suburb within reasonable commuting distance to a work hub under that price cap. So is the State Govt. out of touch with house prices or is the policy a political stunt designed to promote the Govt in a good light?

There has definitely been a surge in lenders offering cash back incentives over the last few weeks. Borrowers need to do the maths to see if there is any real financial benefit (cash back v higher rate) and those with low deposits need to be extra careful that they don’t get locked into.

2
John N
November 13, 2025

Good article. It would seem the only responsible adults are in the RBA. The Government (State & Federal), Banks, Media and many (not all) financial commenators are clearly not responsible for their actions or dialogue, as I am sure these people are far removed from any risk. Will they be made to fall on their swords when things turn nasty (like the previous RBA Governor).

2
Dudley
November 13, 2025


"Always look at the total interest you’ll pay over the life of the loan":

$Nought is good.

Being paid interest is better than good.

The 'Bunk of Dad&Mum': save 80%-90% of after tax income, after 4 years, buy home cash on knocker without mort-gage. Go on to save 50% and have more spare cash than mort-gagors.

1
Derk vdBent
November 17, 2025

Doesnt anyone see the elephant in the room. Bananas $1 each, good old aussie prawn $1 each, one oyster wholesale market $2-$3. Why point at property? Because Noel was a real estate agent back in the day, I was also there in the industry. We tend to measure everything by what we cut our teeth on. Money printing! Inflation, monetary deflation! Nothing to do with banking lendind which has always been a bit random. Also get your figures right, plumbers $150 per and cant find one, cleaners $45 per/h hard working couples (traditional labour) are earning as much as $200k pa, not unusual. Phd graduates are without jobs or teaching 4hrs per week. Labour is winning, the tide has turned, you were all warned when Whitlam won his election, the new povo class are the educated.

1
 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Financial pathways to buying a home require planning

Banks are punishing the most vulnerable

Michael Witts: changes over the final 12 years of my career

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The growing debt burden of retiring Australians

More Australians are retiring with larger mortgages and less super. This paper explores how unlocking housing wealth can help ease the nation’s growing retirement cashflow crunch.

Warren Buffett's final lesson

I’ve long seen Buffett as a flawed genius: a great investor though a man with shortcomings. With his final letter to Berkshire shareholders, I reflect on how my views of Buffett have changed and the legacy he leaves.

LICs vs ETFs – which perform best?

With investor sentiment shifting and ETFs surging ahead, we pit Australia’s biggest LICs against their ETF rivals to see which delivers better returns over the short and long term. The results are revealing.

Family trusts: Are they still worth it?

Family trusts remain a core structure for wealth management, but rising ATO scrutiny and complex compliance raise questions about their ongoing value. Are the benefits still worth the administrative burden?

13 ways to save money on your tax - legally

Thoughtful tax planning is a cornerstone of successful investing. This highlights 13 legal ways that you can reduce tax, preserve capital, and enhance long-term wealth across super, property, and shares.

Why it’s time to ditch the retirement journey

Retirement isn’t a clean financial arc. Income shocks, health costs and family pressures hit at random, exposing the limits of age-based planning and the myth of a predictable “retirement journey".

Latest Updates

Weekly Editorial

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 639 with weekend update

Thank you for the hundreds of responses to our Reader Survey and to maximise the sample size, we’re leaving it open until this Sunday. Here is an overview of the results so far.

  • 27 November 2025
  • 2
Investment strategies

Where to hide in the ‘everything bubble’

It might not be quite an ‘everything bubble’ but there’s froth in many assets, not just US stocks, right now. It might be time to stress test your portfolio and consider assets that could offer you shelter if trouble is coming.

Investment strategies

The ultimate investing hack: dividend growth stocks

Investors often fall prey to ‘amygdala hijacks,’ letting emotion trump reason. By focusing on dividend-growth with stocks instead of volatile prices, you can steady your mindset and let compounding do the work. 

Investment strategies

CBA or global banks?

CBA’s recent pullback highlights single-stock risk. Global banks trade at lower P/Es with rising earnings and dividends, offering investors both income potential and long-term value beyond the local market.

Investment strategies

Global dividends rising, but Australia lags

Global dividend growth surged in the third quarter, with median growth of almost 6%. Australia was a notable exception as dividends fell, thanks to flagging mining company payouts.

Economy

I called inflation's rise and fall and here's what's next

In 2020, I warned that surging US money supply growth would spark inflation. By early 2023, I said US money supply was dropping dramatically and that meant inflation would decline. Here's what happens next.

Superannuation

Are excessive super funds giving Australia “Dutch Disease”?

The irony is profound: a system designed to secure Australians’ futures may be systematically dismantling the economic diversity necessary for long-term prosperity.

Investment strategies

Could your children pass the inheritance ‘stress test’?

You devote years of your life working, saving and investing, striving to build a legacy that will outlive you. Before any wealth moves to the next generation, here are six questions every parent should ask themselves.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.