Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 544

Aged care star ratings are a ‘fail’

In December 2022 the Federal Government introduced star ratings for aged care homes with the aim of providing simple, reliable information about the quality of care. The introduction of the star rating system was a recommendation of the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety which said that the system was needed to provide senior Australian’s and their families the ability to easily assess and compare aged care services based on measurable information.

A recent report by Dr Rodney Jilek titled “The Failure of the Aged Care Star Ratings” indicates that instead of providing the transparency older people need to compare and choose an aged care home, the star ratings may actually lead them to choose a home that is delivering poor care.

How the Star Ratings are determined

The star-rating system draws on data from the National Aged Care Mandatory Quality Indicator Program, consumer experience reports and provider compliance with and performance against the Aged Care Quality Standards as assessed by the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission.

The star ratings are based on 4 domains.

  • Quality – has the lowest weighting in the overall stars making up 15% of the rating. The quality measure uses data on five care quality indicators that operators provide to the government on a quarterly basis under the National Aged Care Quality Indicator Program.
  • Staffing – has a weighting of 22% towards the total star rating. It uses data reported by the provider on the average number of care minutes each resident receives per day and how many of those minutes are with a registered nurse.
  • Compliance – makes up 30% of the overall rating and is based on audits and non-compliance decisions made by the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission.
  • Resident Experience – has the greatest weighting contributing 33% to the overall rating. To measure resident experience the government will contract a third party to interview at least 10% of residents face-to-face about their experience at their aged care home. The interviews will be conducted annually.




Source: Department of Health and Aged Care

The failure of the ratings

The report, by Dr Jilek, compared the 501 aged care homes on the Government’s non-compliance register over 12 months from November 2022 with the star ratings those homes had received. “We targeted the homes on the non-compliance register mainly because they are supposed to be the worst in the country – they’re all non-compliant – so you would reasonably expect that they would represent the lowest ratings. What we found was that the majority of homes (300) were awarded 3 stars, which under the guidelines means that the home is providing “an acceptable quality of care”. 68 of the homes had a 5-star rating for compliance and 81 had 4-star compliance ratings, ratings that (according to the guidelines) are impossible to achieve for homes that have been deemed non-complaint.

The report gives an example of an aged care home that was assessed as non-compliant in 2020, and over the past 3 and a half years has had sanctions imposed and been required to engage external advisers. The home has remained non-compliant for three and a half years and yet has an overall rating of 3 stars, with 4 stars for compliance.

In another example, an aged care home that has 3 stars overall and 3 stars for compliance has a chequered history of compliance spanning 20 years. In 2020 the home failed 7 of the 8 standards, in 2022 the home again failed 7 out of 8 standards. Despite the history, and the fact that the home remained non-compliant, the Aged Care Quality and Safety re-accredited the home for a further 2 years.

The report concluded that the star rating system does not meet its stated objectives of improving transparency, ease of search, facility comparison or to monitor and improve the quality of aged care.

Dr Jilek describes the resident experience measure as “completely useless”, and says that “only 10% of residents are surveyed and the care provider can control the outcome by cherry picking the residents”. He says that it is hard to have certainty around the staffing and quality measures because they are based on unvetted provider supplied data, with no validation or check measure to ensure that it is correct. The only measure being independently reviewed is the compliance measure, which is the role of the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission, and they are giving homes 5 stars for compliance when they have determined that they are non-compliant.

The best research you can do

Undertaking research, such as that carried out by Dr Jilek, outside of the star ratings can be very difficult. While the list of aged care homes on the non-compliance register has a search function, it uses the name that the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission has for the home (which is often different to the name you know the home by), the variation can be small or it can be significant, but any variation to the record will result in no listing appearing.

If you are investigating an aged care home for yourself or a loved one the best way to do your research is to have a respite stay. Respite is designed to give carers a much-needed break but it is also a great way to “try before you buy”. Respite enables you to stay in an aged care home for up to a total of 63 days (9 weeks) per year. That time could be spent in one home or spread across a number of homes, which can be useful if you are unsure which home you are interested in.

A short stay of a few weeks is normally enough time for you to work out whether you like the activities, the other residents, the food and most importantly the care. Respite is also very affordable as there are no accommodation payments and no means tested fees. You simply pay the basic daily fee, set at 85% of the Age Pension, currently $61 per day plus any extra or additional service fees for things like hairdressing, wine and entertainment.

Respite is government funded so in order to get access you will need to have your care needs assessed by the Aged Care Assessment Team (normally just referred to as ACAT). The starting point is to contact My Aged Care either through their website or by telephone.

Having a simple, reliable measure of the quality of care an aged care home provides is crucial in working out whether or not you are going to get good value. Until you can have confidence in the star ratings, it’s best to do your own research.

 

Rachel Lane is the Principal of Aged Care Gurus where she oversees a national network of advisers dedicated to providing quality advice on retirement living and aged care. She is also the co-author of a number of books with Noel Whittaker including best-seller 'Aged Care, Who Cares?' and 'Downsizing Made Simple'.

 

4 Comments
Helen Jensen
January 30, 2024

In my experience it can be very difficult to find an aged care facility willing to offer casual respite especially if the person has high care needs. Other homes only offer respite prior to being admitted as a permanent resident and not to people requiring a couple of weeks’ respite so the carer can have a break.

Lyn
January 26, 2024

My giddy aunt, is that meals and cleaning too? Why aren't surgeons, hospital admission/social workers suggesting respite care after ops. if live alone & struggle first few wks home recuperation? Not one mentioned option, only checked meals available, could I do up and down re toilet & do I have walking stick if needed? Prior shop & prepare 42 meals for freezer so no cook/lift after, almost killed as already ill. Left meal containers soak in water first 10 days until able stand at sink to washup. Respite probably exercise class in situ too so no bump on potholes re cab seatbelt over wounds to get to a class aiding recovery. Just 10 days would have helped had I known. Thank you for the information.

David Williams
January 26, 2024

Thanks Rachel. Excellent analysis. No surprises really. Before getting to the choosing stage, one strategy is to use longevity planning to identify and act on the key issues for maintaining independence and staying out of aged care for as long as possible. Potential bonus of having a longer healthy life expectancy to enjoy and saving money. And maybe giving the aged care sector more time to resolve its issues.

George T
January 25, 2024

Thank you for this information. I've been looking into aged care facilities for my mum, and have also found the ratings wonky, to say the least.

DIY research isn't easy, and I'm relying more on feedback from friends of friends, which is hardly ideal. A respite stay is likely the way to go.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Aged care and the Intergenerational Report

It isn’t just the rich who will pay more for aged care

The aged care recommendations that will cost you more

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

An important Foxtel announcement...

News Corp's plans to sell Foxtel are surprising in that streaming assets Kayo, Binge and Hubbl look likely to go with it. This and recent events in the US show the bind that legacy TV businesses find themselves in.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 575 with weekend update

A new study has found Australians far outlive people in other English-speaking countries. We live four years longer than the average American and two years more than the average Briton, and some of the reasons why may surprise you.

  • 29 August 2024

The challenges of building a portfolio from scratch

It surprises me how often individual investors and even seasoned financial professionals don’t know the basics of building an investment portfolio. Here is a guide to do just that, as well as the challenges involved.

Creating a bulletproof investment portfolio

Is it possible to build a portfolio that performs well in any economic environment? So-called 'All Weather' portfolios have become more prominent of late, and this looks at what these portfolios are and their pros and cons.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 578 with weekend update

The number of high-net-worth individuals in Australia has increased by almost 9% over the past year, and they now own $3.3 trillion in investable assets. A new report reveals how the wealthy are investing their money.

  • 19 September 2024

Why I'm a perma-bull on stocks

Investors overestimate the risk of owning stocks and underestimate the risk of not owning them. In the long run, shares crush other major asset classes, yet it’s one thing to understand this, it’s another to being able to execute on it.

Latest Updates

Investing

Where to find good investment writing and advice

Investors are exposed to so much information that it’s often hard to filter the good from the bad. This looks at how to tell the difference between the two and the best sources of investment writing and advice.

Investment strategies

Are demographics destiny for the stock market?

Demographics influence economies and stock markets, but other factors like technology and policy can overshadow their impact. Diversifying across income-producing assets can help mitigate demographic-driven challenges and build wealth.

Shares

Are we reaching the end of Transurban's gravy train?

You can only push monopoly power so far before it triggers a backlash. Transurban might have finally pushed too far, raising big questions for investors.

The dawn of wicked asset classes

Collectables and other non-traditional assets often rally late in the cycle. But you should only buy them with a clear purpose and with money you can afford to lose.

Property

This property valuation metric needs a rethink

Capitalisation rates, commonly known as ‘cap rates’, are a fundamental metric in Australian property investing.  However, this seemingly simple and ubiquitous measure can be far more complex to use when comparing different types of properties.

Superannuation

Improving access to account-based pensions

Research suggests that 50,000 Australians who are retiring over the next year may not be able to access an account-based pension because they do not meet minimum application requirements of their super fund.

Do sanctions work?

Sanctions are losing effectiveness due to increasing economic polarisation, with many countries increasingly circumventing restrictions. Examples include China, Iran and Russia, whose industries have adapted despite sanctions.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.