Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 641

Don’t rush to sell your home to fund aged care

For years, the mantra around aged care and the family home was simple: think twice before you sell. But in a post-November 1 world with changing rules and financial implications that reach well beyond emotional ties, that advice has shifted to thinking three times.

Many people believe selling the family home is the only way to fund aged care, particularly when faced with the refundable accommodation deposit (RAD) that is normally hundreds of thousands of dollars.

The fact that any unpaid RAD incurs interest at 7.61% per annum can make it seem like a no-brainer – after all, a $750,000 RAD equates to $57,075 a year. The numbers are big and selling the house feels like a simple way to make it all work.

But in numerous instances, keeping your home can provide significant financial advantages, ones you can’t get from any other asset.

One of the biggest misconceptions is that the family home is fully assessed for aged care fees. It’s not. When you move into aged care, the value of your home is only counted in the means test up to a capped value of $210,555. This cap can make a dramatic difference.

Most homes are worth substantially more than the cap. If you have a $1.2 million home then the cap effectively exempts $1 million of it. If you sell the home and pay the RAD, all the money you put into the RAD is included in your aged care assets and any money left over counts towards your aged care and pension means tests.

Selling the family home can feel like the simplest solution – but simple isn’t always smart.

There’s a second consideration: your RAD is exempt from your pension assets test. If you keep your home, it’s not counted towards the pension assets test for two years after you move into aged care. If you are a couple, the clock starts ticking only when the second person leaves.

However, there is a new piece of the puzzle – the exit fee on your RAD. Before November 1, paying a refundable accommodation deposit meant exactly that: all of your money was refunded when you left. Now, there is an exit fee of up to 10 per cent if you stay for five years or more.

Paying by RAD could see a significant portion of your capital disappear; on a $750,000 RAD you would lose $75,000 after five years. While there are certainly no guarantees, keeping your home could preserve the value of your capital and potentially grow it.

Keeping the home isn’t free and doesn’t suit everyone, but the point is that you have options. And it’s worth seeking advice to work out which one is best for you. Selling the family home can feel like the simplest solution – but simple isn’t always smart. The capped value for aged care, two-year pension exemption, and new RAD exit fees mean the financial scales have shifted.

In such a complex environment, it’s literally a case of thinking three times before you act.

 

Rachel Lane is the Principal of Aged Care Gurus where she oversees a national network of advisers dedicated to providing quality advice on retirement living and aged care. She is also the co-author of a number of books with Noel Whittaker including best-seller 'Aged Care, Who Cares?' and 'Downsizing Made Simple'.

 

  •   10 December 2025
  • 7
  •      
  •   
7 Comments
Dudley
December 11, 2025


"Where are the nurses cleaners and cooks etc that I need to look after me in a care facility going to get affordable housing":
In your home could be a good outcome.

4
Graham W
December 11, 2025

I believe that the average stay in age care is only two years, so paying the RAD seems to not be answer. It will not be an option to sell the house for me and my wife as in a few years we will be sharing our house with family.Meeting the interest will be met from combined investments.

Jack
December 15, 2025

I’m confused. In one sentence “all the money you put into the RAD is included in your aged care assets”
In the next sentence “your RAD is exempt from your pension assets test”
So which is it?

AJ
December 15, 2025

Both are true Jack.
Any RAD is assessable for Aged Care fee calculation purposes (for fees determined by income and assets like the Non-Clinical Care Contribution for example).
And, any RAD is exempt for Age Pension means testing puposes.

Steve
January 01, 2026

Believe me people, I have just done it and the crooks in aged care stack it against you, I thought the RAD was exempt and it is for the pension but its not for the meas test on the fees they charge you, eg my dad paid the full RAD sold his house so someone else has somewhere to live, and now he is getting hit over $8000.00 per month in accomodation fees made up of 4
$45 dollars a day extra service fee, that the government lets them charge+ $65 dollars a day aged care service fee+ get this the kicker up to 80k over the first 2 years because thats the average life expectancy once your in there, so that another $8500 per month, My father is currently paying $12000 per month on top of the RAD, stinks

Dudley
January 02, 2026


"My father is currently paying $12000 per month on top of the RAD":

Not obvious how to compute from your numbers. Could you re-state?

Why does not he buy a home and hire help?
= 12 * $12,000
= $144,000 / y.

2
 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Seniors living is becoming a mainstream investment

Super is catching up, but ageing is a triple-threat

10 things I learned about dementia and care homes from close range

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

How cutting the CGT discount could help rebalance housing market

A more rational taxation system that supports home ownership but discourages asset speculation could provide greater financial support to first home buyers.

Is there a better way to reform the CGT discount?

The capital gains tax discount is under review, but debate should go beyond its size. Its original purpose, design flaws and distortions suggest Australia could adopt a better, more targeted approach.

Want your loved ones to inherit your super? You can’t afford to skip this one step

One in five Australians die before retirement and most have not set up their super properly so their loved ones can benefit from all their hard work and savings. 

Super is catching up, but ageing is a triple-threat

An ageing Australia is shifting the superannuation system’s focus from accumulation to the lifecycle of retirement. While these pressures have been anticipated for decades, they are now converging at scale and driving widespread industry change.

Meg on SMSFs: Last word on Div 296 for a while

The best way to deal with the incoming Division 296 tax on superannuation is likely doing nothing. Earnings will be taxed regardless of where the money sits, so here are some important considerations.

Has Australia wasted the last 30 years?

The 20 years after Peter Costello left Treasury have been deemed wasted...by Peter Costello. The missed opportunities for Australia began long before.  

Latest Updates

Taxation

3 ways to defuse intergenerational anger

With the upcoming budget increasingly likely to include bold proposals to alter the tax code I’ve outlined three incremental steps with fewer unintended consequences.

Economy

Why an extended US-Iran war will punish mortgage holders

The impact of the Iran War is far more than expensive petrol. Higher oil prices have secondary inflationary impacts that reverberate throughout the economy which could be bad news for Australians with mortgages.

Infrastructure

Don’t forget the yield

Global Listed Infrastructure dividends are forecast to grow 5-6% p.a over the next two years. After a hiatus, share buybacks are back on the agenda and will play an integral role in shareholder returns.

Iran war hands politicians free ticket to blame oil prices for inflation

Past oil shocks offer lessons for investors dealing with the fallout from the Iran War and the ongoing impact on inflation.

Economy

Japan 2026: A new PM heralds a new golden age?

Former Australian Prime Minister, Paul Keating, once said "When you change the government, you change the country." We're about to see whether that holds true in Japan.

Investment strategies

Why are central banks moving from US Treasuries to gold?

Central banks now hold more gold reserves than US Treasuries, signalling a shift in safe-haven asset strategy and portfolio diversification as geopolitical risks increase.

Strategy

Has global human wellbeing peaked? What the data reveals

Historically economic progress is measured by GDP growth but there is an increasing body of work that explores quantitative measures of wellbeing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.