Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 651

The more things change… longevity just goes on increasing

The first publication of Firstlinks (as Cuffelinks) was 13 years ago in Feb 2013. Longevity was an issue back then. Paul Keating reflected on the growing gap in our retirement incomes system through people living longer. David Bell wondered if people looked back, would they reflect on the performance of their super fund – or the attainment of goals and desires in life. Ashley Owen showed the first of many remarkable insights into the behaviour of markets. The very special Graham Hand outlined challenging times for 2013.

Has anything improved in our collective response to increasing longevity since then?

Superannuation contributions have stalled at 12%. Half our financial advisers have disappeared. Super funds don’t know much more about their members and even less about their life partners. Yet the Government expects them to provide lifetime products that consumers don’t understand. Annuities still struggle for acceptance. Financial advisers have a declining relationship with their clients. People are living longer, and despite a Royal Commission they are facing a more uncertain future than ever for aged care and many want to stay at home. Fear of the future defers reasonable intergenerational wealth transfer. Retiring at 67 puts productivity growth out of step with ongoing longevity increases.

Over the past 13 years there have been references to the impact of increasing longevity in almost every issue of Firstlinks. Australia has the resources to reap the benefits of longevity. Why haven't we done better?

We need a National Longevity Strategy to make the best of this steadily growing opportunity instead of treating it as a threat. What should the strategy focus on?

  1. Raising personal longevity awareness so that each person understands their own longevity better and can act to maximise the personal benefits available
  2. Promoting the importance of couples sharing longevity decisions, from midlife (age 45) and using their own longevity outlook to frame health, financial and estate planning decisions with professional advisers
  3. Using this awareness to more widely promote the personal and national benefits of preventive health behaviour
  4. Promoting the personal and community benefits of staying productive longer
  5. Supporting the development of guaranteed income products that complement a greater awareness of the benefits of longevity rather than being sold by promoting ‘longevity risk’

How should these outcomes be achieved? Better coordination of services related to longevity would make it better for consumers and more efficient for providers:

  1. Super funds should focus on raising longevity awareness in their members and member’s partner, preparing them for engagement with professional advisers in health, finance and estate planning. This can be instituted quickly and requires no regulatory oversight (unlike financial advice). It would strongly enhance the member/fund relationship. Longevity awareness raising for non-fund consumers should also be available free and promoted through Health Direct www.healthdirect.gov.au.
  2. Professional advisers in health, finance and law should have longevity awareness training to enable them to harmonise their advice with properly prepared consumers.
  3. Longevity awareness training and support should be overseen by an independent entity focused on understanding the challenges and opportunities of increasing longevity and providing content for trainers. It should be established by the Federal Government, ideally with the collaboration of service providers.
  4. Employers can benefit from raising longevity awareness in employees and staff, underpinning efforts to increase productivity and retain valuable employees.
  5. Wider understanding of the importance of longevity awareness will reduce the burden on regulation and encourage a more participatory approach.

None of this is rocket science but it does require national co-ordination. A National Longevity Strategy would provide a model which could be successfully introduced to other countries.

The technology and insights to deliver these outcomes is already available. What is required is the collective will to make them happen rapidly. We can’t wait another 13 years!

 

David Williams is Founder and CEO of My Longevity. Try the SHAPE Analyser to focus on your own longevity.

 

  •   25 February 2026
  • 5
  •      
  •   
5 Comments
Aussie HIFIRE
February 26, 2026

Much of the problem here is not that the information isn't available, it is that people don't want to hear it in much the same way they don't want to hear that they're spending too much and not saving enough etc. Would it help if it was easier to find the information, sure, but not that much because that's not the main reason why people don't know about longevity.

It also doesn't help that at least some of the available calculators don't seem to be particularly great. I recall one of them telling me I had less than average life expectancy despite having long lived healthy grandparents and being in great health myself as well as being on the right side of all the other questions, because on some very rare occasions in the past (literally a handful) I had smoked a cigar.

1
David Williams
February 26, 2026

Good insights! Most people will live longer than they expect. The opportunity lies in realising we can do a great deal to make the best of it, even more so if planned in tandem with our life partner. There are lots of barriers a collective effort to raise longevity awareness would sweep away - and a decent bonus for many as a reward.

1
GILBERT
February 28, 2026

we are living in a new aera or peoples those days show off they sold they one million house or on reality maybe value at 750.000 also try to buy the most expensive car or go to the rip off olympic venue .
we all getting old but no many those days eat proper health food to avoid many complications in the later life also so many divorce destroy many life or the court system suck .overall when we reach retirement time we discover we are broke or in poor health ,forget the Doctors or are very busy consultation maybe 15 minutes then next ?yes each individual should have taugth in a model health system implimented the soon you reach 40 years old to found out how you progress with health issue before his to late .
dicipline very important now 85 years old never drink never smoke walk 5 km everyday and maitin a very good diet .not overweigth and enjoy everyday wake up happy ready for an another day.

1
Dudley
February 28, 2026


At the moment of retirement planning for the worst is rational.

Share prices crash, hyperinflation, fund fraud, ... longer longevity.
The '4% rule'# and similar based on 5% chance of 'wipeout' before death, leaving a 95% change of no wipeout.
The most likely outcome, 50% chance, results in dying with more than the retired can be bothered spending.

# Analysing the past gives some the comforting illusion of future certainty.
Others, unwilling to take a 'leap of faith', seek sanctuary in the '1% rule' dying with heaps more, eg Warren Buffett.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Are lifetime income streams the answer or just the easy way out?

How long will you live?

How much super should you have?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.