Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 653

Showcasing your value in the age of AI shortcuts

For the past few decades, being in shape was the ultimate ‘proof of work’. You couldn’t buy it. You had to earn it. Unless you had top 5% genetics, you had to build your physique through diet and exercise.

But then something incredible happened. GLP-1 agonists (like Ozempic) hit the market and, overnight, a better body was only a weekly injection away. As a result, the old signal (being fit) became less valuable as it could now be acquired without the physical exertion.

The same thing is happening with writing. Writing used to be a craft where someone toiled for hours thinking through a set of ideas before putting them out into the world. Today, that’s no longer necessary. You can have an LLM generate seemingly infinite text at will.

This explains why I saw more books published in 2025 than I can remember in recent years, especially by people who don’t write regularly. Funny, huh?

Of course, if you rely too heavily on AI, your ‘writing’ won’t be all that good. Either way, the written word is far less useful as a signal of thought or effort than it used to be.

I call this signal collapse and it’s happening again and again across different domains. For example, writing code used to be a reliable signal of skill and dedication. But with OpenAI’s Codex and Anthropic’s ClaudeCode, today that seems less true.

AI doomer articles over the past few weeks haven’t helped the situation either. On February 9, Matt Schumer released Something Big is Happening, and on February 22, Citrini released The 2028 Global Intelligence Crisis, which both went viral.

There’s a lot I don’t agree with in both articles, yet both seem directionally accurate. We are moving toward a future more reliant on LLM-intelligence, not less. And in that future, many signals that used to demonstrate value will be easier to fake.

So, how do we display value going forward? What’s the new proof of work?

The new proof of work

In a world increasingly dominated by low-effort, here are a few ways to signal the opposite:

  • Leverage your history: If you had a particular skill before it became commoditized, demonstrate that. Lean into it. By showing people that you did something before it was easy, it proves that you are willing to put in the work to master something. More importantly, it showcases that you have an actual interest in the field. If I had to pick between hiring a programmer who’s been doing it for 20 years or one who started with AI a few years ago, I’d take the veteran every time. Though knowledge is becoming commoditized via LLMs, experience, taste, and judgement are still at a premium. This explains why top lawyer fees have skyrocketed even as AI usage explodes.
  • Unfortunately, leveraging your history won’t be helpful for those just starting out, but it showcases how you can go about building your career.
  • Do deep work: Focus is a superpower and, increasingly, a signal. In an age of distraction, those who can spend weeks, months, or years on a single project will separate themselves from the pack. Cal Newport calls this idea Deep Work. You can demonstrate deep work by completing things that require sustained attention—like complex projects, novel content, or differentiated research. Most people can’t work for an hour straight without checking their phone or logging into social media. But, if you can, then you’ll have a huge edge over others in everything you do. In a world where our attention is being pulled in 100 different directions, the ability to focus on one at a time is an unfair advantage.
  • Command attention: Speaking of attention, if you want to stand out, command the attention of others. Because our world is so easily distracted, having people’s attention is proof that you have created something valuable. That attention doesn’t have to come from social media either. Having the attention of a local community or a niche group can be just as powerful as having it within a popular online space. You don’t need to be a content creator, but if you can keep attention and build a community, you will undoubtedly be rewarded for it. I believe this will be especially true for in-person communities in 2026 and beyond.
  • Embrace the machine: If you can’t beat ’em, join ’em. Instead of looking at AI as a foe to be avoided, treat it as a partner to help you level up. As I’m sure you’ve heard before, “AI isn’t going to take your job—someone using AI is going to take your job.” There’s no better way to counteract this than to become the person who knows how to use AI. I’m not saying you need to become an AI expert, but you should know enough to expand your capabilities and keep up with the latest tools. Not only will this demonstrate that you take this seriously, but it also highlights that you can be adaptable.

Don’t just take it from me though. In Deep Work, Cal Newport highlighted the people that he thought would have an advantage in an increasingly digital economy (and this was from 2016!):

“In this new economy, three groups will have a particular advantage: those who can work well and creatively with intelligent machines, those who are the best at what they do, and those with access to capital.”

Newport’s categories map well onto the ones above:

  • Those who work well with intelligent machines = Embrace the Machine
  • Those who are the best at what they do = Leverage Your History + Do Deep Work
  • Those with access to capital = Command Attention
    I swapped capital with attention because, in many ways, attention is the new capital.

Whatever you decide to do, there’s a structural shift happening in the economy that’s going to take some time to play out. Some believe that this transformation will make labor obsolete. I’m skeptical, but some of the signs are there.

For example, the labor share of the non-farm business sector in the U.S. has declined about 15% since the turn of the century. As you can see in the chart below, labor’s share (of the non-farm business sector) was basically flat from 1947 to 2001. But it’s been on a gradual decline ever since:

We are also seeing economic trends that rarely occur. Kelly Evans recently wrote about how there’s a jobless boom - where the economy surges even as the labor market remains weak. This isn’t normal. Historically, growth and hiring typically moved together. But today, that doesn’t seem to be the case.

For the past few weeks I’ve written a bit more about AI than you might expect from a personal finance/investing blogger. But there’s a reason for it. Though I’d love to ‘stay on message’ and write more posts validating Just Keep Buying, this would be doing you a disservice.

Because, the truth is, your finances will be impacted more by your career than what the market does.

Of course, the market matters, but your income matters more. How AI transforms your industry matters more. How you rise above signal collapse matters more.

If I want to continue to be helpful, I must periodically address these issues. Though the signals of the future will continue to evolve, if we continue to evolve with them, we’ll do just fine.

 

Nick Maggiulli is the creator of personal finance blog Of Dollars And Data and the Chief Operating Officer at Ritholtz Wealth Management. For disclosure information please see here. If you liked this article, consider signing up for Nick’s newsletter.

 

  •   11 March 2026
  • 2
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

More than money

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Testamentary trusts post-budget: Estate planning, tax reform and the ‘death tax’ debate

Proposed Budget changes to taxation are casting new uncertainty over testamentary trusts, prompting closer scrutiny of estate planning structures and the real implications of reforms still taking shape.

How to minimise tax with a will

Inheritance tax implications in Australia may surprise some, as poor estate planning without proper wills or trusts can lead to costly tax bills and delays for beneficiaries.

Meg on SMSFs: The CGT changes don’t impact super but what about Div 296 tax decisions?

New CGT rules could tip the scales in the super vs non-super debate. For those facing the Division 296 tax, the case for withdrawing has gotten more complex. A "comparison rate" tool may help assess decisions.

High quality businesses are on sale

Beneath the dominance of the ASX's largest stocks, much of the market has been left behind. High-quality companies are now trading at levels rarely seen, offering opportunities for investors willing to look deeper.

The strange effect of the 30% minimum capital gains tax

The 30% minimum tax on capital gains sits at the heart of the budget's proposed reforms. Yet the mechanics reveal anomalies that introduce unexpected distortions that raise questions about its design.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 667 with weekend update

The downfall of the giant and three lessons for investors.

  • 18 June 2026

Latest Updates

Latest from Morningstar

Ranking three common retirement strategies

The defining challenge of retirement isn't just about building wealth, it's about converting your lifetime savings into sustainable income. A holistic understanding of different strategies can improve long-term outcomes.

Economy

Was life really better in the good old days?

Are we worse off than previous generations? Lately, there seems to be a heightened level of angst that economic conditions are getting harder and that the two-party political system (and maybe democracy too) is failing voters.

Retirement

Australia has saved $4.5 trillion for retirement. Here's what matters more

Most Australians approaching retirement can tell you the exact dollar value of their super account. But success depends on more than a sizeable balance. Here's four key questions to ask yourself at the start of the financial year. 

Who gains in an AI-supercharged economy?

AI is already reshaping the economy, but companies building transformative technologies rarely capture the greatest long-term value. Instead, those benefits accrue to the users. We may well see this pattern reproduced. 

Taxation

Div 296's million-dollar reset worth $25,000

The 'cost base reset' for the new super tax is being sold as protection for pre-July gains. A worked example shows $1M of protection is worth about $25,000, and the real deadline has not passed.

Latest from Morningstar

The forecasting fix that Wall Street missed

Asking whether markets are overpriced may be the wrong question. New research suggests that traditional valuation metrics used to forecast returns may have been misread. Here are five takeaways for investors.

Investment strategies

Should a fund manager invest their own money differently?

Investors often like the idea that fund managers should invest client money exactly as they invest their own. But reality is more complicated. Unique circumstances make a different approach rational and, at times, beneficial.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.