Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 167

How angel investors give birth to disrupters

Ben Heap is Founding Partner of H2 Ventures, the manager of the H2 Accelerator programme, which helps to launch early-stage fintech start-ups. Each programme runs for six months, with H2 choosing up to 10 start-ups per round. Typically comprising two to three entrepreneurs per team, H2 looks for a combination of technology expertise, such as a coder or engineer, and financial markets expertise. The aim is to have a marketable product within three to six months. H2 takes a 10% equity share in return for $100,000, and is building a portfolio of 100 or more fintechs.

Ben spoke to Graham Hand at the Sydney fintech hub, Stone & Chalk, on 29 July 2016.

“The point of an accelerator programme is taking raw talent, often with a nascent idea that they think is more advanced than it is, and refining the idea until they have a minimum viable product. Our mission is to help them on this journey.

Entrepreneurs are great at convincing themselves that their idea will change the world. It’s completely different making that into a viable business. We are angel investors, we put a structure around the idea and provide mentoring as they turn the idea into a business. Angel money is often family and friends, while an accelerator is more professional and adds discipline. Angel money is usually $50K to $250K, while seed money is $500K to $2 million, often from an outsider who wants to actually make some money. At the seed stage, the business moves from the two- to four-person founder team who are not being paid, to hiring employees, and paying the founders a bit of money.

Angel money does necessarily require that founders can’t be paid from the money. Everything we do is about giving the founders as much flexibility as possible. If the founder wants to pay themselves, we ask them to carefully consider if it is the best use of the money at the early stage. The mistake an accelerator or angel can make is to spoon-feed the founders, then at the end of the programme, they are in a world of pain because they have to work it out for themselves. We might help with the pros and cons but we let them make the important calls. We want to set them up to pitch their business to seed investors.

It’s not all about the idea. It’s 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration. Our focus is on the individuals and the team and whether they are capable of delivering the idea, or the idea they move to as they start to test it. The majority of teams we back, the idea evolves, or ‘pivots’ as we say. As investors, it’s not only the idea, the key is always execution.

I have described our business as talent identification, similar to a search firm. We look at a lot of applicants, and we have a structured process of screens and interviews. We expect people to read our website and self-select away if they don’t like what we do. It’s not always young people. In fintech, we find an older cohort than other VCs although it’s mainly 25 to 35-years-old, with some older. We want people who have seen a few things, different roles in different places. We look for the ability to cope and apply a skill.

It’s not dissimilar to fund managers. They are often a bit quirky, with an ability to focus 24/7, and a healthy level of self-confidence. It’s important, since most of their smart friends will say, ‘That’s never going to work’ or ‘Nobody will buy that.’ They need enough confidence to push through that when others will stop. But that’s why the opportunity exists. They also need to take onboard the right advice, and they must sift through it, while still owning the problem.

They must work full-time, and a leave of absence from a job is not good enough. We don’t think the project can work without full commitment, they need to forget Plan B.

We have learned the dynamics of teams. When two to four people come into a start-up, it’s akin to a marriage. It’s a long-term commitment. They depend on each other, and foibles will annoy each other. We have made mistakes in not anticipating these problems. We are always improving our legal documents to help founders to protect themselves. Founder shares allow for a claw back of shares if someone leaves early. Of course, you can have advisers and board members who provide advice.

In financial services, regulation is often the biggest hurdle. Despite ASIC’s ‘sandbox’ approach for startups, the time and complexity of the licencing process does not lend itself to the iteration process of a start-up. ASIC needs flexibility to accept new approaches rather than retro-fitting businesses into existing regulations. By the end of the programme, the start-ups should be over regulatory hurdles.

Australian fintech is new so we cannot identify an excellent business we have missed, although there are some terrific founders we have seen who will become incredible success stories at some stage. We meet most of them given our position in the market. Our accelerator may not be right for them, they may be past that stage.

What if the money runs out but the idea is still there? An accelerator model demands they go out and raise seed money. We expect 75% of the ventures in the programme to be successful enough to raise seed money. We don’t put more money in once a start-up is in the programme.

We will move into the early seed money at some stage. We see an opportunity in future for retail investors to invest in a diversified fintech portfolio that is professionally managed.”


Graham Hand is Editor at Cuffelinks. Ben Heap is Founding Partner of H2 Ventures.



Being Jon Medved: three decades of start-up investing

How to invest in early-stage tech businesses

Private equity’s role in a well-constructed portfolio


Most viewed in recent weeks

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Anton in 2006 v 2022, it's deja vu (all over again)

What was bothering markets in 2006? Try the end of cheap money, bond yields rising, high energy prices and record high commodity prices feeding inflation. Who says these are 'unprecedented' times? It's 2006 v 2022.

Latest Updates


Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Survey: share your retirement experiences

All Baby Boomers are now over 55 and many are either in retirement or thinking about a transition from work. But what is retirement like? Is it the golden years or a drag? Do you have tips for making the most of it?


Time for value as ‘promise generators’ fail to deliver

A $28 billion global manager still sees far more potential in value than growth stocks, believes energy stocks are undervalued including an Australian company, and describes the need for resilience in investing.


Paul Keating's long-term plans for super and imputation

Paul Keating not only designed compulsory superannuation but in the 30 years since its introduction, he has maintained the rage. Here are highlights of three articles on SG's origins and two more recent interviews.

Fixed interest

On interest rates and credit, do you feel the need for speed?

Central bank support for credit and equity markets is reversing, which has led to wider spreads and higher rates. But what does that mean and is it time to jump at higher rates or do they have some way to go?

Investment strategies

Death notices for the 60/40 portfolio are premature

Pundits have once again declared the death of the 60% stock/40% bond portfolio amid sharp declines in both stock and bond prices. Based on history, balanced portfolios are apt to prove the naysayers wrong, again.

Exchange traded products

ETFs and the eight biggest worries in index investing

Both passive investing and ETFs have withstood criticism as their popularity has grown. They have been blamed for causing bubbles, distorting the market, and concentrating share ownership. Are any of these criticisms valid?



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.