Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 538

A closer look at UniSuper and AustralianSuper

Increasingly, industry superfund members also need quality advice, and advisers need detailed information as to what’s under the hood of the large industry superannuation funds.

In response, Morningstar is gradually expanding its research coverage and, in 2023, added UniSuper to our multi-asset options coverage. Its level of internalisation is high relative to its peers. But Tim Wong, Director of Manager Research, concluded that: “UniSuper's clever handling of a major internalisation program has seen it build a capable team while taking care to avoid overextending its reach.” Adding UniSuper to our coverage lineup of large superannuation funds highlighted that there are different ways internalisation can be approached. And it reinforced the benefit of looking under the hood.

UniSuper versus AustralianSuper—Different approaches to internalisation

All three of UniSuper's assessment pillars (Parent, People, and Process) were awarded Above Average with an overall rating of Bronze. This puts it on par with AustraliaSuper’s overall rating of Bronze. As far as internalisation goes, both funds have a high proportion of assets managed internally, but the overall team size differs meaningfully as does the investment teams' global footprints.

In our “Is Your Industry Super Fund Too Illiquid?” paper, we took a look at the level of illiquid assets held at the fund and option levels of five large superannuation funds. AustralianSuper has a much higher proportion of illiquid assets compared with UniSuper (refer to Exhibit 2) and has built a large internal team to manage these assets.

 

Typically the management of private assets is more resource-intensive, which partially explains the stark difference in the number of internal investment professionals. In the AustralianSuper research report, we commented that “Phenomenal asset growth has seen AustralianSuper evolve continuously. Its suite of capabilities has expanded considerably, with private assets, illiquid credit, and global bonds priorities, alongside beefed-up operational and risk groups. To be clear, this isn't costless, and breakneck hiring needs to be balanced against becoming too bureaucratic.”

UniSuper has taken a more incremental approach to internalisation and to hiring. Its internalisation program started in 2009, and the first share was traded in 2010. Morningstar’s assessment is that “further internalisation is likely to be incremental rather than revolutionary." See Exhibit 3.

UniSuper's internalisation journey

UniSuper has also elected more of a partnership approach for their private asset mandates. Let’s take the Direct Property asset class by way of example. UniSuper holds $4 billion of directly owned property assets that have been managed under a unique mandate arrangement for over 20 years. The partnership leverages the expertise of the external specialist property manager while enabling the internal team to maintain full control over all aspects of the portfolio.

The bottom line here is that internalisation can be executed in various ways across different funds and have meaningfully different outcomes when it comes to the number of investment professionals and the level of complexity inherent in a fund.

People: A key ingredient

The number of internal investment team members is one thing; attracting quality people and retaining them is another. People are a vital pillar to any successful investment management business. And achieving equivalent levels of competence with external managers is a key ingredient to a successful internalisation program. There’s no point in internalising assets if the returns are subpar compared with an external manager. Therefore a deep dive into the quality of the investment team, its retention levels, the superfund’s culture and overarching governance bodies is necessary to determine whether the fund stands a chance of delivering equivalent returns to an external manager.

UniSuper and AustralianSuper are not immune to the challenges of assembling and retaining a quality investment team. Both funds have had their fair share of high-profile departures. At UniSuper, Simon Hudson and Mark Himpoo departed the high-performing equities team in 2021-22. AustralianSuper saw disruption in its property team with Bevan Towning departing in April 2023, and John Longo and Neil Harvey leaving in late 2019. And then there were the high-profile departures of AustralianSuper's Head of Equities Innes McKeand, who left in early 2021, followed by Justin Pascoe in early 2023. The point is that attracting and retaining quality people is a challenge, as is shaping the right organisational structure to accommodate bright, ambitious investment people. Growing pains should be expected given the rapid rate of growth these funds have experienced.

AustralianSuper is tackling the additional complexity of locating their investment teams globally. They have strategically inserted "head office" staff members into their global offices to ensure that the homegrown culture permeates these global offices.

Then there are the Chief Investment Officers, or CIOs. UniSuper’s John Pearce “would (also) be a hard act to follow” according to our research report. And “CIO Mark Delaney has overseen sound development of internal teams” as well as AustralianSuper’s investment success since the start. Culture starts at the top—so how long these two leaders stick around and how the organizations look to handle their eventual succession are definitely watchpoints.

The governance structures and trustees overseeing these investment teams should not be underestimated, and it is worth considering as part of the due diligence. Tim Wong notes that “UniSuper has assembled a credible board and investment committee, suggesting a sensible decision can be made on succession.”

Alignment to members is also important. One of the big selling points of working for a large, profit-for-member fund is the sense of purpose that an investment team enjoys from serving members. And the Morningstar report comments that, “Alignment with members is credible: Performance pay for senior investment staff is largely tied to the Balanced fund, and investment staff superannuation is defaulted into the AustralianSuper fund.”

The key point to note here is that an internalised investment function is a complex investment management business that should be scrutinized accordingly. There’s no point internalising if the fund is unable to build a high-quality investment team that is set up to deliver quality outcomes for members. Hiring and retaining quality people and putting the right governance and incentive frameworks in place are key to successful delivery.

The runs on the board

So, have these internal investment teams delivered for members compared with an outsourced model? That’s a very difficult question to definitively answer, but both UniSuper and AustralianSuper’s Balanced Options have posted very strong long-term returns relative to both the Morningstar Australia Growth Target Allocation NR AUD Index (a tough hurdle!) and their category peers. Investors eat net returns, and it is pleasing to see that the internalisation programs at both funds have delivered solid outcomes for their members.

Performance

What's the cost?

One of the key drivers of internalising investment management is to keep fees and costs low. Net returns should be the measure of success, however, given how heavily fees and costs are scrutinised in this market, it’s worth taking a look at them. Both funds have managed investment-related fees and costs as well, as shown in Exhibit 5. Unlisted and private assets are typically more expensive and might explain some of the differential between the two.

Fees and costs

Approaches to internalisation—Take a close look

UniSuper and AustralianSuper have both attained Morningstar Medalist status for a reason—their investment people and investment process are high quality. But as these large superannuation funds grow and evolve, there’s no one-size-fits-all model to success. Managing large pools of capital can be approached in different ways—and no one way is more right or effective than the other. What is clear is that these funds are now large, complex investment businesses, and it's worth taking a look under the hood before making an investment decision.

 

Annika Bradley is Morningstar Australasia's Director of Manager Research ratings. Firstlinks is owned by Morningstar. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor. This article was originally published by Morningstar.

Access data and research on over 40,000 securities through Morningstar Investor, as well as a portfolio manager integrated with Australia’s leading portfolio tracking service, Sharesight. Sign up to a free trial below:


Try Morningstar Investor for free


 

12 Comments
Kethandapatti
February 27, 2024

Your analysis is so simple and easy to understand even for finance ignorance engineer. Thanks.
I am not a finance person. I am an engineer with a bit of add on finance knowledge. I have managed my own SMSF for many years (reasonable well I believe) along with Australian Super and Unisuper accounts. I am coming from another angle. Unisuper used to be one of the best customer service institutions. I could walk in to their office in CBD and provided with good service. With their expansion the service team/s did not expand. COVID and 'working from home' did not help. Australian Super to me was always difficult to deal, but seemed to have improved. For many of retirees like me the face of the fund is the customer service. There is ample scope for funds to improve. But they are both good and dependable and ride short term dips very well.

Opaque
December 11, 2023

Would never invest in AustralianSuper, opaque valuations and risky fixed asset.

Richard
December 10, 2023

It would have been interesting to throw Australian Retirement Trust into the mix. As I understand it, they have largely abandoned active equities management in favour of an indexing approach.

Concerned
December 24, 2023

Whatever their approach it is failing. Last year QSUPER Balanced return was half the industry average and is below it's peers on returns for the YTD, 1 year, 3 year, 5 year and 10 year periods. Last year they handed back the keys to an $877,000,000 infrastructure investment in New York and their response is "Don't worry about it as it is only a small fraction of our investments". Now whenever ART refer to their investments they are referring to the Sunsuper accounts they acquired. Their other asset QSUPER, particularly the Balance Fund, rarely get a mention.

Ian Barnwell
May 01, 2024

This is the exact reason I left ART`s Qsuper. You forgot to mention that Qsuper is closing it`s underperforming Sustainable Fund and that members have an upcoming class action against the board.

Former Fund Director
December 10, 2023

There is a similar set of problems with selecting external managers. Having served on a large fund which used them, the process seemed to be that every few years senior management went on an around the world tour and reported back: The folk at the existing managers had changed since the last review; Performance at each manager was down on benchmarks (having been up when recommended last time); We needed to change to some new managers who had outperformed in recent years. Then the process repeated some years later. A colleague in another fund told me they had done a study which involved moving a portfolio after every period from the current manager to the manager which had the best return in the prior period. He told me that in general the performance lagged the benchmark even though the study assumed zero cost transactions on each occasion. My personal preference is internal management as one can manage the people more directly and have only one agency discount and risk between the customer and the money.

Dane
December 09, 2023

No mention of how 'balanced' Aus Super's balanced option is given that ~80% of its portfolio is in risk assets. It's certainly balanced across risk assets. Also what of their notoriously opaque valuation policies on the illiquid assets (30% of portfolio)? This has a potentially adverse impact on accumulation members buying units at inflated prices. Given the disparity in performance vs listed prop/infra/equity this is surely worth understanding. If they are not marking their assets properly it's going to flatter their returns. I think an 80/20 Index fund be a better benchmark given investors can actually access this via something like Vanguard? Surely they aren't mbeing measured against a 60/40 index? This review feels pretty flismy. Is this how it has to be in order to get access?

michael walmsley
December 08, 2023

Thanks Annika to top article of nicely would be to match against the indexes

Bruno
December 07, 2023

Interesting article but what is the basis for saying the internal equity teams were high-performing? Neither fund discloses performance and with such a huge scale, surely they would each struggle to deliver even benchmark returns.
Comparing balanced options is also nebulous as there will be different sector allocation and different willingness to reflect reality in their unlisted assets. But kudos to UniSuper for having such (relatively) low illiquid exposure and still generating a decent return.

NKG
December 09, 2023

True, difficult to measure the Balanced fund, especially against other Balanced funds. However, for Australian Super, their Australian and International options have outperformed their respective Benchmarks, the ASX 200 Franked Index and the MSCI All Country World ex Australia Index (unhedged) over 10 years, after fees and costs, according to their website.

June
January 12, 2024

I would hope that that 'self assessment' is audited?

David Toohey
December 11, 2023

I agree that performance versus indexed benchmarks is the most important metric of performance. And I note that APRA agrees with us, too, given that performance versus indexed ETFs is the basis of APRA's Heatmap and Annual Performance Test. Recently the data for 8 years to 30 June 2023 was released, showing UniSuper at #2, Australian Super at #4, for example. So we're stuck with definitely irrelevant total returns comparisons in this forum, instead of potentially flawed net-of-benchmark returns.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Admin fees on large super funds vs SMSFs

Is your industry super fund too illiquid for its safety?

The super wars revisited: Vanguard vs AustralianSuper

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Where Baby Boomer wealth will end up

By 2028, all Baby Boomers will be eligible for retirement and the Baby Boomer bubble will have all but deflated. Where will this generation's money end up, and what are the implications for the wealth management industry?

Are term deposits attractive right now?

If you’re like me, you may have put money into term deposits over the past year and it’s time to decide whether to roll them over or look elsewhere. Here are the pros and cons of cash versus other assets right now.

Uncomfortable truths: The real cost of living in retirement

How useful are the retirement savings and spending targets put out by various groups such as ASFA? Not very, and it's reducing the ability of ordinary retirees to fully understand their retirement income options.

How retiree spending plummets as we age

There's been little debate on how spending changes as people progress through retirement. Yet, it's a critical issue as it can have a significant impact on the level of savings required at the point of retirement.

Meg on SMSFs: $3 million super tax coming whether we’re ready or not

A Senate Committee reported back last week with a majority recommendation to pass the $3 million super tax unaltered. It seems that the tax is coming, and this is what those affected should be doing now to prepare for it.

20 US stocks to buy and hold forever

Recently, I compiled a list of ASX stocks that you could buy and hold forever. Here’s a follow-up list of US stocks that you could own indefinitely, including well-known names like Microsoft, as well as lesser-known gems.

Latest Updates

Retirement

How much do you need to retire comfortably?

Two commonly asked questions are: 'How much do I need to retire' and 'How much can I afford to spend in retirement'? This is a guide to help you come up with your own numbers to suit your goals and needs.

Investment strategies

Protecting retirement income from inflation shocks

As we continue to navigate a volatile market and geopolitical landscape, retirees need a portfolio with protection from inflation risks so that they don’t experience another cost-of-living crisis when inflation has another upturn.

Investment strategies

Where to find value in a multi-asset portfolio

Bonds have had a dreadful few years and their positive correlation to equities of late means they may not be the diversifier in portfolios that they once were. What are the alternatives to bonds, and where might there be value?

Superannuation

How the $3 million super tax impacts unfunded pension schemes

Unfunded defined benefit plans mostly cover current and former Commonwealth and State public servants. These schemes are different from funded ones, yet the new $3 million super tax will treat them similarly.

Exchange traded products

Two overlooked tax advantages of investing in ETFs

We're nearing the financial year-end and it's a good time to think about your tax strategies. Here are two tax advantages to having ETF investments, plus a bonus perk if you’re in a fund hedged to the Aussie dollar.

Property

Why healthcare is a compelling property niche

Healthcare has been a bright spot in an otherwise challenging environment for commercial property. With an ageing population, the sector's future remains bright, and here's a look at the best ways to play it.

Strategy

The maths of friendship

Did you know you're far more likely to share genes with friends than non-friends? Or the number of friends you have is correlated to the size of certain parts of your brain? These are the latest findings of a famed psychologist.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.