Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 524

A different approach to equity income investing

Rudi Minbatiwala has managed the Equity Income Fund at First Sentier Investors since its inception in 2005. With his team, Rudi has developed a novel way to generate income from Australian equities.

Graham Hand (GH): You've spent a couple of decades developing your Equity Income strategy. How would you describe it?

Rudi Minbatiwala (RM): We use the label ‘objectives-based’ to address the needs and challenges of income-seeking investors. This group is the typical pre-retirees or retirees, and their objectives are not only maximising returns. They're thinking about a mix of good returns, with lower volatility and of course, income. There are multiple objectives and a conflict between objectives.

Our belief is that maximising income from Australian shares requires investing in companies that can grow earnings and dividends over the long term. But income is not viewed with a long-term lens, it's a here-and-now problem. So we need to address the income and lower volatility needs as well. And our approach is selectively using call options to generate a greater proportion of the return as income. This equity income approach is called a ‘buy-write’ or a ‘covered call’ strategy.

GH: Can you explain how your approach differs from other equity income funds?

RM: The traditional approach tilts to buying high-yield, dividend-paying stocks. But I come from a fundamental analysis background which requires a broad range of inputs as part of comprehensive stock research. I struggled with investing based on one factor which throws out all the value from the research effort. And in the last 18 or so years, equity income and the better ways of doing it have become my life.

GH: Let’s make sure everyone understands ‘buy-write’ or ‘covered call’, which I describe as selling call options over an existing portfolio. And a call option is giving someone the right to buy a stock at a set price and your fund sells call options to generate income.

RM: So the starting point is building the underlying stock portfolio, but in all the years of our Equity Income Fund, there's only been one month where our portfolio's dividend yield - ignoring the options premiums received - has been higher than the market. Think about that for an equity income fund.

GH: Yeah, that's unusual.

RM: It's about building the best ideas portfolio. We think the usual approach is misleading. The dividend yield is a short-term metric. It compares the current dividend to the current share price without thinking about how they change over time. We want exposure to future earnings growth of the best companies.

GH: Not just the highest-yielding companies.

RM: And the benefits come back to us over time in the form of (hopefully) growing dividends and some eventual reflection in a growing share price. The percentage yield can look low for years, but the dollar value of income can be growing really healthily. It requires a long-term perspective to income. And this is where the buy-write strategy comes in. We can't just say to our investors, think about income with a long-term lens. They need the income here and now. And so, the role of the options is to provide a bridge that allows us to focus on the best stock ideas. If it's got yield, great. If it doesn't, it doesn't matter either. The options provide the additional level of income and a downside cushion of lower volatility. And that's how we go back to achieving that mix of objectives mentioned at the start.

GH: I want to make sure that people understand the selling call options part. Can you give a stock example?

RM: Here’s a recent one. James Hardie (ASX:JHX) is a stock with attractive investment opportunities but it's decided to keep capital and reinvest it in the business. So, now it's a non-dividend paying stock. Typical equity income investors would just push that one to the side, but we like the upside potential. When its results came out recently, the stock responded, and then we thought the stock was more fully valued. We still like James Hardie, so we want to keep a position in that stock, but there's an opportunity to cap some of the potential upside in return for income.

Let me bring this example to life with some numbers. James Hardie was trading at $46.57 on 8 August when we agreed to sell a JHX Call Option with a strike price of $51.22 and expiry date of 11 October on a proportion of our JHX shares (at this time, 26% of our holding). In our assessment, capping the potential share price upside to 10% over the next 64 days was attractive given we were compensated with a certain upfront option premium income of 56 cents per share (annualised yield 6.9%pa). And that income is generated if the share price stays flat, goes up a little bit or even goes down. That's the balancing act.

GH: Whether that example plays out remains to be seen. Have you got an example of something that you did maybe 10 years ago, which was a low-yielding stock, not traditionally held by equity income funds, but you liked the capital gain potential of it?

RM: A great example is Again, it's a stock that has been ignored by most equity income investors because it's only ever had a yield in the 1% to 2% range for a 14-year period. But it offered a 2% yield 14 years ago on a share price of $10 or $15, and then it became a 2% yield on a stock trading at $20 to $40, and now it's a 2% yield trading on a price of $140.

Along the way, like any active manager, we'll take some profits to reflect our fundamental views. Perhaps we sell an option to cap some of the future potential upside as we go along, convert that into income, and our job is to change the degree to which we use options on each stock.

GH: You've also said that your equity income fund can replicate the market risk characteristics of a traditional 70-30 portfolio. Now that's a big call for an equity income fund. How do you justify that?

RM: The 70-30 concept, 70% equities-30% cash, is often used to de-risk away from 100% allocation to equities. But the problem is that the de-risking also delivers a similar reduction in expected returns. It potentially addresses a risk objective but at the expense of achieving the other two objectives of long-term returns and income. We use the options to reduce the short-term exposure to the market by around 30%. It hovers over time at 20% to 40%, but on average, it's in that ballpark of around 30%. So our Equity Income Fund lags in rising markets and cushions a falling markets, similar to a 70-30 portfolio.

GH: That’s because you sold call options. If the market runs strongly, the counterparty exercises the call option, their right to buy, and your fund loses something off the top.

RM: Yes. But in other times, if the markets were weak, flat, or just going up a little bit, we've earned that premium. The big difference is our equity income approach remains fully invested in shares, like a long-only portfolio, which means that over the full market cycle, we expect full capture of what is called the equity return. What comes off in a strong market is made back on the other side. The value add is delivering similar returns to the market but with less risk. And that’s what pre-retirees and retirees want, rather than just higher fund returns than the benchmark, which is more of an accumulation-centric mindset.

GH: Why does the more traditional approach of chasing high-yielding stocks dominate equity income investing?

RM: I can understand why individual investors do the high-yield concept themselves. The strategy I'm talking about is a lot more challenging to implement. Individual investors don't receive the same over-the-counter pricing benefits that we do as a large investor. And the media is attracted to simple stories. We acknowledge our approach is more complex, but that's only because the things that retirees are looking to achieve, a balance of different objectives, different timeframes, conflict between objectives, that's more complex too.

GH: Another way we tend to talk about market performance for simplicity reasons is before-tax returns without factoring in tax benefits, such as franking credits.

RM: We think about after-tax returns with the combination of capital growth, dividends, as well as the franking credit benefits. Franking credits are valuable, but they need to be considered as just one of the components towards maximising after-tax returns. After-tax returns are not simply about maximising franking credits. We value franking credits, we capture them, but they don't become the sole basis upon which we buy stocks.

Let me come back to selling an option above the current share price. It reflects our view on a value of the stock. And if it goes up, well, that's where we are comfortable to reduce some of our positioning at that price. So it's no different to any other active investor thinking about managing their sell discipline. And we also avoid those companies who keep paying a dividend even if they raise new capital to afford it.

GH: Are your investors puzzled by an equity income fund holding stocks with a yield lower than the overall market?

RM: We own, James Hardie, Xero, Wisetech - all the names not usually in an equity income fund, but the combination of stock and options delivers a lower volatility with the aim of delivering a higher income yield after the addition of the option premium income. I'm not telling a 65-year-old to change their ways, to take on more risk. It goes back to the start of our discussion. How do we best balance a combination of needs? It's not just to de-risk to manage more conservative needs. It's not just to throw everything into generating income. Most investors still need to think about longevity and inflation risk, or estate planning considerations that make an investment time horizon longer. Equities should remain a part of that thought process.


Graham Hand is Editor-At-Large for Firstlinks. Rudi Minbatiwala is Head of Equity Income at First Sentier Investors, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is intended for general information only and does not consider the circumstances of any investor. It is an edited transcript of a full discussion on the Wealth of Experience podcast published soon.

For more articles and papers from First Sentier Investors, please click here.



Positioning a portfolio for today's market conditions

Global search for short-term losers and long-term winners

Too big to perform? The importance of limiting capacity


Most viewed in recent weeks

Australians unprepared for $3.5 trillion wealth transfer

A new report suggests that Australians are ill prepared for the largest intergenerational wealth handover in history. It's estimated $3.5 trillion in assets will be transferred from Baby Boomers to their children by 2050.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 534 with weekend update

Many people in the Firstlinks community have been reading my articles and editorials for 10 years or more, and worked with me for decades before that, and deserve an explanation for why I have suddenly stopped writing each week.

  • 9 November 2023

18 rules for ageing well

The rules to age successfully include, 'the unexamined life lasts longer', 'change no more than one-eighth of your life at a time', 'nobody is thinking about you', and 'pursue virtue but don’t sweat it'.

Why the ASX 200 has gone nowhere in 16 years

The ASX 200 is around the same price that it was 16 years ago. The poor long-term performance can be largely blamed on our taxation system, which encourages companies to pay out most of their earnings as dividends.

The challenges of building a lazy portfolio

John Bogle famously advocated a two-fund portfolio of US stocks and bonds. Recently, I tried to create an Australian version of the Bogle portfolio and found that what seems simple can quickly turn complicated.

SAPTO and LITO, or do you really need an SMSF?

Money withdrawn from super after age 60 is tax-free but less understood are arrangements that allows a couple over the age of 67 to earn up to $57,948 per year outside super and pay no tax with LITO and SAPTO.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Two proven ways to make big money in markets

Many ASX success stories – like JB Hi-Fi, Lovisa, and AUB – have followed one of two strategies: rolling out single store formats nationwide or consolidating fragmented industries. Here are the secrets behind these business models.

Investment strategies

The bank is still a terrible place to put your money

With the RBA having lifted interest rates by 4.25% over 18 months, many investors now see cash as an attractive investment option. That ignores the silent tax of inflation, which makes other assets better investment alternatives.

Little to fear from APRA's hybrids review

APRA's objections to hybrids are misplaced. If the regulator wants more safety in our banking system, it will come at the expense of effectiveness, and that's why wholesale changes to the hybrid market are unlikely.

Investment strategies

Rates higher = shares lower… is it that simple?

Typically, higher interest rates are associated with lower share market valuations, but not always and the relationship hasn’t been that strong over the long term. Company fundamentals will matter more over the next few years.

Investment strategies

Diversification is not a free lunch

Harry Markowitz said that “diversification is the only free lunch in investing” as holding a broader range of assets can result in better returns without assuming more risk. This has become accepted wisdom - but it isn't true.


Why Asia remains one of the world's best growth stories

China’s economic slowdown and the resilience of the US dollar have dimmed the lustre of many Asian economies’ strong growth momentum in the past year. But heading into 2024, Asia's growth story should reignite.

Podcast: Property picks, PE update, and Warnes on Michelle Bullock

Charter Hall's Steven Bennett talks through commercial property's challenges and opportunities, Schroders' Rainer Ender on private equity's bright spots, and Peter Warnes on how RBA hawkishness will impact rates and the economy.



© 2023 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.