Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 351

Avoid complacency with your SMSF's investment strategy

Your SMSF is required to have an investment strategy which is a plan for making, holding and realising investments in line with the fund’s investment objectives. It’s a common misunderstanding that the strategy should be a mere statement of the types of investments your SMSF will invest in.

There's more to it than many trustees think

But that’s not enough. The Australian Taxation Office (ATO), as a regulator of SMSFs, has recently said that trustees need to explain why the fund has made the investments. They also are interested in how the strategy provides benefits to each fund member on retirement or how it will provide for their dependants after the member’s death.

Don’t be surprised if the auditor of your SMSF takes greater interest in the investment strategy because it’s a requirement that it is reviewed regularly.

If your SMSF’s investment strategy is general and has not considered the risks in making, holding and realising investments in addition to the likely returns, it may have a problem complying with the superannuation law. As trustee, you need to consider the objectives of the fund and any cash flow requirements plus the members’ insurance requirements.

The superannuation law requires that a fund trustee must consider:

  1. The fund’s investments as a whole and include the extent to which those investments are diverse or involve exposure of the fund to risks from inadequate diversification.
  2. The liquidity of the fund’s investments, having regard to its expected cash flow requirements.
  3. The ability of the fund to discharge its existing and prospective liabilities.
  4. Whether the trustees have considered insurance cover for one or more fund members.

You may be the sole member of your SMSF or have recently become the sole member of an SMSF because of a change in membership. Your adviser may recommend a review of your SMSF’s investment strategy to fine tune any change in the fund’s cash flow requirements, investments and maybe the insurance needs of members. If you don’t have an adviser, then it could be time for you to review it.

Investment strategy and fund audits

During the last six months, the ATO has focussed especially on SMSFs that have high concentrations of investments in one asset class such as property, shares, cash or fixed deposits. It sent out around 18,000 letters to remind SMSF trustees that the fund’s investment strategy should justify the is a lack of diversification.

In the first instance, they require the fund auditor and you as trustee to make any changes. We have seen a renewed interest by auditors in closely examining funds to ensure the investments are consistent with the fund’s investment strategy. This is usually brought to the attention of the trustees in the auditor’s Management Letter but in the worst cases may be brought to the ATO’s attention.

If your SMSF’s investment strategy doesn’t adequately demonstrate what the law requires, you probably have one of two options:

  • Replace your SMSF’s current investment strategy with one that meets the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act, or
  • Provide an amendment to the current investment strategy which provides additional information on how the trustee(s) have considered the above requirements.

In most situations, auditors have accepted an amendment that includes the extra information required. This usually covers how the trustee has considered the SIS requirements and why investments have been made to provide the required benefits. 

What you need to do if there is a change

Your SMSF’s investment strategy must adequately reflect changes. This is especially true following recent stockmarket falls, where asset allocations may have fallen outside defined bands. A good SMSF administrator should advise you when this happens, as we do with clients of SuperConcepts. Other changes include where:

  • the cash flow requirements of the fund alter if you decide to start or stop an income stream
  • a lump sum is to be paid in cash,
  • someone has joined or ceased as a fund member.

The law requires a regular review and the trustee’s confirmation that it has taken place, usually each year.

 

Graeme Colley is the Executive Manager, SMSF Technical and Private Wealth at SuperConcepts, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is for general information purposes only and does not consider any individual’s investment objectives.

For more articles and papers from SuperConcepts, please click here.

 

1 Comments
Greg McKay
April 06, 2020

Begs the question: who is running your SMSF.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Meg on SMSFs: Tips for the last member standing

Meg on SMSFs: Where are the risks in our major super sectors?

A guide to valuing SMSF assets correctly

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.