Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 284

Beyond financial solutions for longevity

I appreciated Jeremy Cooper’s recent excellent article on meeting the challenges of longevity risk. Erudite actuaries and investment gurus have long sought investment products which guarantee income for the life of each investor.

While I support efforts to craft better financial products and solutions, we must also make more effort to educate our rapidly-growing older population. There is much they can do to reduce longevity risk themselves. The focus on financial literacy seems to have been most effective at younger ages but not as much beyond midlife. Reallocation of resources into greater longevity awareness is required.

What could be the key elements?

1. Realising that at age 65 (‘retirement age’), over 75% of people are not within three years of the number of years nominated in Life Table expectancies. As shown in the diagram below, there is an enormous range of mortality outcomes, making estimates of how long money will last much less realistic than most people appreciate.

2. Recognising that the rest of their life is likely to play out in three stages: 1) able, 2) less able but still independent, and 3) dependent. Life will be materially different in each stage. For a majority of people at age 65, for example, the able stage is over 10 years, prompting serious consideration of alternatives to stopping paid work too early. This may not be viable as dependency rises.

3. Understanding that the longer they live, the longer they are likely to live, but much of this extra life is likely to be independent. If their prospective lifespan increases, so their dependent phase is likely to reduce.

4. Appreciating that successful ageing is likely to reflect their personal focus on four main issues: 1) exercise, 2) effective social engagement, 3) diet and weight control and 4) appropriate mental challenges.

5. Knowing that indefinite extension of lifespans seems unlikely, but the cost of staying alive will rise to reflect increasingly expensive medical solutions.

6. Accepting that home-based aged care is inevitable for most, and that preparing family and dwellings for this eventuality should be a priority in the able stages of longevity, not when the need becomes evident.

7. Contributing to the debate on assisted dying, recognising the ethical, emotional and financial considerations and expressing a personal view in a way people close to you understand.

8. Factoring in that cognitive issues such as Alzheimer’s disease (now a major factor in the death of older people) appear to reflect earlier life behaviours which many people can address with the hope of deferring the onset.

Averages disguise significant variability

Only 200 years ago, the average baby would not live beyond 40 years old. Babies born today are on average expected to live beyond age 80. Society has made use of this - through better education, communications, infrastructure, laws and governance and greater wealth to invest in living standards. While most people realise this remarkable change is ongoing, few realise what it can mean for them personally.

If we look at a very large group of 65-year-olds in Australia, we know on average how long they will survive. This diagram below shows the percentage of deaths expected in groups of five years. The average survival is 21 years for a 65-year-old. It sits inside the blue column, which represents less than a quarter of the total age group, so the average is not very helpful. At this age, men live about three years less than women.

Success in dealing with longevity risk is more likely to reflect management of the elements outlined above rather than hanging out for financial products which may be a partial solution but will not address the broader opportunities and risks in our longevity for the rest of our lives. People should be empowered to take more control of their personal circumstances, and better education is the key.

David Williams is Founder and CEO of My Longevity. Try the SHAPE Analyser to focus on your own longevity.

RELATED ARTICLES

Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

7-point checklist for managing the uncertain timing of death

The future of retirement is already here

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Strategy

$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Strategy

Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.