Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 324

Choosing your investment strategy is like a road journey

Investors are faced with a significant and growing challenge. Stretched government balance sheets and an ageing population will likely place greater emphasis on retirees to ‘self-fund’ their retirement. At the same time, the expectations for market returns have fallen in line with record low interest rates in Australia and elsewhere.

The traditional safe haven of term deposits is now offering on average just 1.5%, which may not even keep pace with inflation.

So for most of us, the requirement to take some investment risk will be essential to achieve our long-term savings goals. This is where the options can get a little complicated, so let’s break it down.

There are many ways to take more risk, but let’s focus on the two key actions that can easily be implemented within your portfolio: changes to asset allocation and investment strategy selection.

Changes to asset allocation

In its simplest form, varying your equity versus bond mix can be an effective way to match your required return to your investment goals, but the potential for extra return does not come without taking on added risk.

Too much risk and you may not be able to stay the course through the inevitable market downturns on the journey to achieving your goal. Behavioural mistakes made along the way can cost years of investment returns, so best to match the risk of the strategy to your own tolerance.

Strategy selection

Within each asset class, another way to seek a higher return is through the strategies that you select for your investment portfolio.

An active investment strategy generally seeks to take positions that differ from broad cap-weighted market indices, to deliver a higher return. Unlike changes to your equity/bond mix, which can increase the total risk of your portfolio, selecting an active strategy introduces what is referred to as ‘active risk’.

To borrow a driving analogy, if the most direct route to your destination, which may be a main arterial road or freeway, is akin to a cap-weighted index, then using your local knowledge of back roads and traffic conditions to arrive at your destination ahead of time, could be considered the active strategy equivalent.

Traditional active managers employing skill and experience to outperform is not the only way however.

Over the last few decades, other strategies have emerged which can be used to pursue outperformance. These strategies - commonly either quantitative strategies employing sophisticated modelling techniques, or factor-based strategies seeking to harvest identified risk premia - endeavour to deliver a positive ‘active return’ against a benchmark.

To extend the driving analogy, systematic strategies could be likened to the rise of driving algorithms, such as Google Maps, which help to get us to our destinations faster by analysing data sets of past and present driving conditions.

Whether you prefer to test your own driving skill, utilise Google Maps or simply take the direct route, understanding the likelihood for success, and the risk you are taking if your choice doesn’t work out, is critical to making an informed decision.

Active risk

Active risk is typically measured in terms of the expected difference between the returns of the strategy and the returns of the underlying benchmark, which more often than not will refer to a comparable cap-weighted market index. You can look for active risk indicators from the fund manager which may be disclosed as ‘tracking error’ or ‘active share’.

Other indicators of active risk include the number of securities held by the portfolio, the maximum position size in any one security, the rules listed for deviations of sector or country weights in the case of a global strategy, and past results.

The spectrum of risk

At the lower end of the spectrum, market cap index funds can be characterised by low cost, low-to-no active risk, and high transparency owing to the rules-based nature of market cap indices.

Systematic strategies such as factor funds can span a broad spectrum when it comes to active risk, however, most follow a set of rules which drive the weighting of securities in the portfolio, providing transparency of approach, assuming the rules are disclosed, and are typically lower cost than more traditional active strategies.

Traditional active strategies come in many forms, from highly-diversified, low active risk approaches, to very concentrated, high active risk strategies. The cost you are willing to pay should be scaled according to the level of outperformance you expect and the perceived skill of the manager.

Your unique circumstances

Where you end up with your choice is highly personal, as a successful strategy is one that is structured to deliver on your investment goals. Recognise that your asset allocation choice and where you land on the growth / defensive spectrum will be the main driver of your overall return.

Patience is critical to success and remains an accessible edge for those who possess it, whether you are a professional investor responsible for the goals of others, or an individual investor saving for your personal goals.

 

Aidan Geysen is Head of Investment Strategy at Vanguard Australia, a sponsor of Cuffelinks. This article is for general information purposes only and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

For more articles and papers from Vanguard Investments Australia, please click here.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Unpacking investment risk in superannuation

Three underrated investment risks in retirement

Does Bitcoin warrant a small allocation in portfolios?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.