Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 586

Clime time: US debt, the weak AUD and the role of super funds

There is one significant observation that is neither well reported nor well understood. Readings of macro numbers sporadically report on it, but they do not delve into its significance or what it means for the flow of investment capital.

What is it?

It is the relentless strength of the USD, the mighty greenback. USD strength shows that the US economy is excessively calling upon and draining the developed world’s capital.

The massive US fiscal, trade and capital account deficits are significantly (and disproportionately) funded by foreigners. The US economy dominates developed world growth, but it requires or feeds off continuous drawings of global capital.

This funding will continue for as long as the US corporate sector shows superior technological advancements over international peers.

A moribund, ageing and over-regulated Europe provides little investment alternative to that of the US. And until Asian economies develop the ability to challenge the US in terms of liquidity and political, accounting and legal security, Australia will continue as a capital provider to the US. 

The consequences are examined below.

US budget deficits and its debt are consuming the world’s capital

Whilst the US economy approximates 30% of world GDP, its government now accounts for 32% of world government debt. Further, as its debt has grown it has burnt through foreign capital providers with Japan, China, UK and even Russia, each of which were large US bond holders at various points over the last 25 years.

The current budget (2024) is presented in the next chart and it shows a deficit of US$1.6 trillion. Inside that deficit, some US$763 billion is interest. This indicates that the US is currently paying (on average) about 2.1% for its debt.


Source: US Treasury, Monthly Treasury Statement, July 2024

It is disturbing to note that if the US government was to pay its current cash rate (4.75%) for its debt, then the interest bill would rise to US$1.5 trillion. Simply stated, the US government cannot afford to pay current short-term interest rates and therefore the Fed needs to get interest rates down and quickly.

The US economy is dynamic, and it has propelled world growth prior to the entry of China, and now India, as alternative growth engines. The US stands well above the developed world in terms of both technological and medical developments, but it has drawn immense sums from its trading and investment partners to do so. It is stunning that 346 million citizens drive a world economy of 8.2 billion people.

The next chart is crucial: it tracks the net international investment position of the US over the last 20 years. This position measures the difference between US overseas owned assets and those held by foreigners in the US. It measures shares, bonds, corporate debt and property etc. and shows that the difference has grown from US$1.66 trillion (deficit) in 2005 to US$22.5 trillion (deficit) in March 2024. About 50% of this net capital deficit is held by foreigners in US bonds.

The transmission effect of these capital flows that fund US government debt is that the USD rises to meet the constant foreign currency inflows. It is a self-perpetuating positive loop for the USD. The more the US needs capital and funding, the higher its currency goes. So too do speculative assets that benefit from US pricing – gold and bitcoin are prime examples.

For Australia (in particular) and other developed economies, this has become a significant problem as the US draws our capital to sustain its growth. That growth is important for the world economy until the developing world takes over.

Indeed, this is shown clearly in the next chart that compares Australia’s real household consumption growth with that of the US household sector. US household consumption has driven both the US and the world economy.

US consumption growth is superior because it has achieved real disposable income growth. Australia’s real disposable income has declined since the covid pandemic.

US consumption has also driven the profitability and therefore the valuations of US listed corporates compared to the rest of the world. Indeed, the US market now represents 72% of the world equity market index. That feature alone draws in massive quantities of index invested capital residing around the world in passive pension funds.

Weak AUD has consequences

So where does Australia sit in the complex funding of the US economy?

With A$3.7 trillion (US$2.5 trillion) of super assets, our superannuation funds are 30% larger than Australia’s GDP. Our large industry funds have no choice but to invest in the US economy. Therefore, they will continue to contribute to the US economy by investing enormous sums into US Treasuries, corporate debt, equities, and infrastructure.

To do so, our super funds must sell AUD to buy USD. This means our currency will remain under selling pressure until the US economy falters or our capital managers can find other regions in which to invest.

Importantly, the international currency market will probably not revalue the AUD against the USD. Our credit rating, our trade surplus, our budget surplus, and our superior national debt position will have little effect on the value of the AUD. Therefore, our investment thought process must adopt as a likely scenario a weak currency outlook and its consequences.

Conclusions and observations

  1. Australia's currency will continue to be undervalued which means that imported inflation remains a concern - cash rates will be held above our international peers;
  2. Whilst the RBA will cut interest rates in 2025, it must be at a lower rate than those seen offshore – to support the AUD;
  3. Mortgage rates will decline through 2025 giving relief to the “mortgaged” household sector – providing an uptick to Australian economic growth in 2025;
  4. Australian inflation will meander downwards, and more cost-of-living support will be needed - expect significant pre-election packages.
  5. Post the US election, the funding of the US economy will become a focus for bond markets in 2025 – any upheaval in bond markets will see a swift return to QE;
  6. If QE returns as policy in the US,  expect Europe to follow. The developed world has far too much debt and cannot support higher interest rates; and
  7. Income returns (over capital growth) will dominate returns to investors – the outlier being the US equity market which continues to draw in passive capital.

My conclusions suggest a volatile outlook for markets in 2025 as the world once again is forced to assess the impacts from and policy responses required to deal with enormous debt levels.

Australia’s debt problem resides in a part of our household sector. Our total household debt is too high,  in a sector of the community which is the core of our future – the youth. The government needs to respond with smart assistance programs that do not further fuel house price rises. An intricate problem that is not being properly debated.

The world (particularly the US) debt problem resides in the government sector and it is most likely that the Fed will revisit its policy response adopted in the 2018 bond tantrum. Other central banks will then surely follow.

 

John Abernethy is Founder and Chairman of Clime Investment Management Limited, a sponsor of Firstlinks. The information contained in this article is of a general nature only. The author has not taken into account the goals, objectives, or personal circumstances of any person (and is current as at the date of publishing).

For more articles and papers from Clime, click here.

 

  •   13 November 2024
  • 7
  •      
  •   
7 Comments
Jack
November 15, 2024

This and James' article have different takes on the same theme - US attracting more capital and the implications of that for other countries such as Australia. Since Trump was elected, the market has given its verdict on our prospects and it hasn't been pretty.

Neil
November 15, 2024

The comparison of real household disposable income across countries is a cracker. I didn't realise Australia was such an outlier.

Barry
November 17, 2024

I don't agree with this sentence: "Simply stated, the US government cannot afford to pay current short-term interest rates and therefore the Fed needs to get interest rates down and quickly."

It doesn't matter how much debt the US government has or what the interest rate is as long as most of that debt is owned by the Federal Reserve. This is because the Federal Reserve just remits all of its profit back to the US Government.

Dudley
November 17, 2024

USA government pays interest to many individuals and entities other than Federal Reserve Banks. They want a competitive risk adjusted rate of interest, else they won't lend to USA government.

John Abernethy
November 17, 2024

Hi Barry,

Thank you for your comment.
Just to clear up any misconception.

The current US cash rate is 4.75% and the yield curve is flat.
The average rate paid on existing US government debt is about 2.1%.
The US Federal Reserve (FED) owns about 25% of US government debt (bonds from 3 QE programs) and it is the largest single holder.

Yes, if the FED owned (say 60%) of US Bonds then higher interest rates may be managed by the FED transmitting the interest back to the government.

It requires a massive QE program (circa $10 trillion) for the FED to become the biggest holder of US bonds. However, there is a precedent and it has been done before - by the Japanese Central Bank.

Ross Baildon
November 17, 2024

John, a thought provoking article. Thankyou for Sharing!

Alex pollak
November 17, 2024

Excellent note john

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Don’t underestimate Australia

Clime time: Has Australia wasted the last 30 years?

Why systemic risks from ‘Big Super’ may be overplayed

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.