Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 340

Despite strong 2019, institutions wary of GFC coming

Last year, 2019, was better than many expected, but as 2020 is underway, institutional investors are not particularly upbeat. According to the annual Natixis Investment Managers global survey, institutions around the world are concerned that ongoing low yields, stalled trade talks and slow global growth represent significant risks to portfolio performance. In fact, 83% expect a GFC-type event within the next five years.

The survey collates the views and expectations of 500 institutional investors, including 19 from Australia. Those surveyed control USD15 trillion of assets and include superannuation funds, sovereign wealth funds and other corporate pension funds. Their views on what’s in store and how to respond offer compelling insights into what Australian institutional investors are likely to do in 2020, and how this will affect returns.

The major portfolio risks

The survey findings showed investors’ top five portfolio risks for the year ahead are:

  • market volatility (53%)
  • interest rates (50%)
  • credit crunch (37%)
  • liquidity (36%)
  • deflation (20%).

The question isn’t which risk will do the damage, it’s more a question of when. A majority of institutional investors say they expect the next GFC within the next five years, as shown below. Almost three-quarters (73%) project trade will have a negative impact on performance, as well as slow growth and the low yield environment. About 58% see the potential for asset bubbles to thwart performance and 89% are concerned about the impact of rising public debt on global financial security.

Allocations between active and index

When asked about how they intend to respond to these risks, 74% of institutions said that uncertain markets call for active management. As shown below, despite the strong returns from passive investments in 2019, most institutions believe a 70/30 split between active and passive is the right mix. They believe that large inflows into passive investments present significant risks, partly because they indicate that the market is ignoring fundamentals, but also because large flows risk amplifying volatility.

The investment outlook

Australian institutions are asking how they should invest to achieve a target return, without becoming too caught up in macroeconomic factors over which they have no control. There is a sense that the global macro and geopolitical events – Brexit and trade tensions for example – are taking a long time to play out. There is widespread acceptance that keeping a sharp focus on meeting investors’ retirement and investment goals in the face of difficult market conditions is their number one priority.

Even though they see challenges on the horizon, institutions are not planning significant allocation shifts. In fact, current allocations are within one or two percentage points of what institutions projected for 2019, as shown below. Those looking to adjust alternative allocations say they will increase allocations to private debt, infrastructure and real estate.

Diversification and the role of non-traditional assets

What does a diversified, robust portfolio actually look like? Lower yields have rekindled risk appetite globally, including in Australia. Faced with historically low yields, and a Governor of the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) who has explicitly stated that ‘lower for longer’ is likely to be the new reality. Investors understand that they have to move up the risk curve in order to achieve reasonable rates of return.

As a result, we are seeing more niche strategies included in portfolios. In Australia, institutional investors are looking outside traditional asset classes to real estate, infrastructure, private equity, hedge funds, global macro strategies, ESG-focused funds and global credit. They are also looking outside of traditional asset managers to provide exposure to these markets. This means greater willingness to unclude offshore asset managers if they are convinced of the value the manager can bring.

The growing role of environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors

The reasons for the institutional embrace of ESG are illuminating. More than half (54%) say that there is alpha, or excess returns, to be found in ESG, and 57% focus on ESG in order to align their assets to organisational values. Even more surprising perhaps is that it’s not all about returns or even their own organization. More than a quarter (28%) of institutions said ESG in order to help make the world a better place.

We are also seeing an evolution in ESG thinking with more institutions integrating sustainable development goals into their portfolio. There is more rigorous thought process around the carbon footprint of an overall portfolio, rather than honing in on specific sectors or companies. For example, a key theme for Mirova, Natixis Investment Managers’ affiliate manager dedicated to sustainable investing, is to identify which companies will likely benefit from the transition from old world reliance on fossil fuels to new world renewables, and to keep their portfolio’s carbon footprint below the 2 degrees agreed by the Paris Agreement. 

Managing investor expectations in 2020

When asked about investors’ expectations for 2020, many institutions expressed concern that investors are not as acutely aware of the risks on the horizon as they should be, nor of the necessity of shifting portfolio allocations to more ‘risky’ assets in order to meet long-term goals. Over three quarters of institutions said that individual investors have unrealistic return expectations, while a similar amount don’t understand their own risk tolerance and may even liquidate their assets prematurely due to fears of a recession.

The survey also revealed the tendency of individual investors to focus too heavily on short-term results. This problem, prevalent in Australia, can mean losing sight of the importance of staying invested for the long-term.

Education is key. Investment managers are taking steps to fully inform their investors about risk and return and the importance of diversification and active management. Our industry needs to rebuild trust post the Royal Commission, and we need to offer investors credible solutions at a reasonable price.

Investors need to tune out market noise, build meaningful positions within their portfolios and invest with conviction over the long term. Keeping a close eye on market conditions, maintaining a truly diversified portfolio – with a mixture of traditional assets and non-traditional assets – is the best way to help investors achieve their long-term goals.


Louise Watson is Managing Director at Natixis Investment Managers Australia. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.



'Unprecedented' should be 'here we go again'

4 reasons why cash is a core portfolio allocation

Uncertain times but be ready to lock and load


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Latest Updates


The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.


RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.


4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.


Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.


Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.


Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.