Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 647

Finding yield on the ASX

Like the track Upside Down by Diana Ross in the final series of Stranger Things, the ASX has become an upside-down world in which riskier dividend yields sit below risk-free government bond yields. Now is as important a time as ever for investors to think carefully about what bond-like stocks to hold in their portfolios.

Introduction

The Australian share market is known for its yield appeal. As shown in the below chart, yield comprises a more meaningful portion of total return than for a number of other offshore share markets, and especially so after allowing for Australia’s unique dividend imputation system.

Our yield status in Australia reflects, among other things, the following:

  • Many companies are domestic only (ie only operate in Australia), a constraint on growth (vs major offshore markets which serve much larger addressable markets);
  • Many are mature and incumbent, again limiting reinvestment opportunities (eg major banks, telcos, health insurers, and most REITs and consumer staples);
  • High payout ratios (which iterates with the above two factors), limiting capital available for reinvestment to grow; and
  • Taxation – Australia’s unique imputation system makes dividends a more efficient way to return capital to shareholders than other methods (eg share buybacks).

What is the yield of the ASX at present?

The yield on the ASX200 is currently ~3.4%. This is its lowest level in 20 years.

The low yield of the ASX is even more revealing when overlaying the yield of Australian 10-year government bonds. Notice in the next chart that the yield of the ASX has mainly exceeded the yield of 10-year government bonds – a sensical outcome given equities are riskier than bonds. However, since mid-2023 equity yields have tracked below government bond yields.

Is lack of yield made up for in higher growth?

Bond yields are fixed; dividends are not. One therefore might ask whether stronger dividend growth has compensated for today’s lower dividend yields.

Unfortunately, the answer is no. The next chart plots the rolling 12m-forward dividend per share of the ASX 200. After a collapse then spike during the COVID-19 period, dividends have since retreated to be around 2019 levels. Also note the cyclical nature of the time series, which reflects dividend volatility from the two largest sectors of the ASX – banks and resources. Overall, unlike in the pre-GFC period when low yield sat alongside strong dividend growth, today it's low yield and low-to-no-growth.

Where is the low yield of the ASX coming from?

In the main, the decline in yield for the ASX comes from the big end of town being rated differently to a time ago. The table below lists 17 large cap companies known as reliable dividend payers. This group collectively accounts for 45% of the ASX 200. Note at the bottom of the table the weighted average yield of the basket (using today’s index weightings). Back in 2019, this basket yielded 5.9% (before grossing up for franking) vs the Aussie 10-year government bond yield at 2.5%. Fast forward to today and you get 4.1% dividend yield vs 4.8% for the 10-year bond. Upside down.

Also observe that the long-term growth rate in dividends from these stocks overall is 0%. This further validates why we have compared ASX yield stocks with government bonds given their fixed income nature.

Why is it so? What will it take for value to return?

We don’t have good answers on this. On fundamentals, none of the above names have changed to offer either more growth or less risk than a time ago (same for the broader market). Thus, explaining the grind down in yield has us resort to the vagaries of liquidity and sentiment. The rise of passive investing, smart beta ETFs (eg VHY.ASX), and super funds seemingly having more money than there are assets to invest in, has contributed to today’s picture. It begs the question: what is it going to take for conditions to return normal – i.e. a world not upside down? Or, more practically, how can investors find value in this environment?

What should investors do? Is it time to buy a LIC?

The backdrop of higher bond yields and pausing policy rate cuts in Australia represents a challenge to ASX investors focused on yield. Not only has yield meaningfully declined, but it’s also not growing. It is self-evident that as demand for high yield ETFs and passive products has grown over time, return prospects have diminished. A well-known casualty of this trend has been reduced demand for listed investment companies (LICs), resulting in many trading at meaningful discounts to book value and yields well above the ASX. Clime’s own LIC, Clime Capital (CAM.ASX) is a prime example of this, trading at a 15% discount to NTA and yielding 7.7% with 50% franking.

 

Steve Lambeth is Portfolio Manager for Australian Equities at Clime Investment Management Limited, a sponsor of Firstlinks. The information contained in this article is of a general nature only. The author has not taken into account the goals, objectives, or personal circumstances of any person (and is current as at the date of publishing).

For more articles and papers from Clime, click here.

 

  •   28 January 2026
  • 11
  •      
  •   
11 Comments
Peter
January 29, 2026

Hear! Hear! CAM . What a disappointment.Held them for a few years but no longer. And now only 50% franked to make matters worse.
Far better investments around .

3
AlanB
January 30, 2026

Yields (current dps/current share price) are lower because prices are higher.
But look at the dividend yield we now get on shares we bought years ago.

3
Jan H
January 29, 2026

LICs may pay high dividends at the expense of capital growth. Example, CAM pays 7.7% 50% franked but its long-term share price is in decline since its 2009 low, post GFC.
In 2009 its price was roughly 0.47 and only 0.71 sixteen years later. If you had held the share for that time, the income may have made up for the capital loss. I haven't calculated that. Other shares paying fully-franked dividends and capital growth are a much better investment in my experience.

1
stan mcdonald
January 29, 2026

Fully agree with Jan H,it is total shareholder return that matters.
The only refinement needed then is whether to measure with franking credits or not.

Dudley
January 29, 2026


"income may have made up for the capital loss":

Nope:
https://www.marketindex.com.au/asx/cam/advanced-chart
ADJ of splits & dividend, Indexed to 100
= (322 / 105) ^ (1 / (2026 - 2005)) - 1
= 5.76% / y.

3
Rob
January 29, 2026

It all depends on perspective really.
I am a large, long term holder of CAM (900,000 shares at last count) and am very happy with the performance per se - yes the discount to NTA is annoying - but what I have bought is a replacement income, with some prospect of capital growth to come (but not entirely essential).

1
Stan
January 29, 2026

Perspective ? Rob,check your numbers.If you bought anytime in the last 17 years you are looking at a capital loss,the size of which depends on when you purchased.
What is your annualised total return ?

2
Rob
January 29, 2026

Yes, I currently have a paper loss, but in reality I've lost nothing if I don't sell (other than another opportunity perhaps, but with a lower yield?).
Remember, I'm buying an income, I don't really care what the share price does - I'm not selling. As it stands CAM pays me $48,600 pa in cash and another $10,400 pa in franking credits - that's $59,000 pa. That'll do me thanks.
Cheers

Les
January 29, 2026

Ineresting article and analysis Steve re dividend yields. As a short/medium termTrader/Chartist I'm not at all interested in dividend yeilds unless, by accident or luck I pick some up on the way through a trade. I'm just too impatient to wait for a hopefully good divdend from any ASX listed Company. As you stated bond yeilds are looking more attractive for passive investors long term. Sectors at any time have my interest and right now Gold, Silver and Uranium are making me smile.

Alee1256
January 31, 2026

Gold, silver, uranium and copper, have nothing to do with income growth and yield. Article is "Finding yield on the ASX".
Not a chartist here but sold most of the above mentioned just before all went down. Now will put all my hefty profits in income stocks and ETFs.

1
 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Are franking credits worth pursuing?

Two thematics to watch in volatile times

What’s going on in Australian equities?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Building a lazy ETF portfolio in 2026

What are the best ways to build a simple portfolio from scratch? I’ve addressed this issue before but think it’s worth revisiting given markets and the world have since changed, throwing up new challenges and things to consider.

Get set for a bumpy 2026

At this time last year, I forecast that 2025 would likely be a positive year given strong economic prospects and disinflation. The outlook for this year is less clear cut and here is what investors should do.

Meg on SMSFs: First glimpse of revised Division 296 tax

Treasury has released draft legislation for a new version of the controversial $3 million super tax. It's a significant improvement on the original proposal but there are some stings in the tail.

Ray Dalio on 2025’s real story, Trump, and what’s next

The renowned investor says 2025’s real story wasn’t AI or US stocks but the shift away from American assets and a collapse in the value of money. And he outlines how to best position portfolios for what’s ahead.

10 fearless forecasts for 2026

The predictions include dividends will outstrip growth as a source of Australian equity returns, US market performance will be underwhelming, while US government bonds will beat gold.

13 million spare bedrooms: Rethinking Australia’s housing shortfall

We don’t have a housing shortage; we have housing misallocation. This explores why so many bedrooms go unused, what’s been tried before, and five things to unlock housing capacity – no new building required.

Latest Updates

3 ways to fix Australia’s affordability crisis

Our cost-of-living pressures go beyond the RBA: surging house prices, excessive migration, and expanding government programs, including the NDIS, are fuelling inflation, demanding bold, structural solutions.

Superannuation

The Division 296 tax is still a quasi-wealth tax

The latest draft legislation may be an improvement but it still has the whiff of a wealth tax about it. The question remains whether a golden opportunity for simpler and fairer super tax reform has been missed.

Superannuation

Is it really ‘your’ super fund?

Your super isn’t a bank account you own; it’s a trust you merely benefit from. So why would the Division 296 tax you personally on assets, income and gains you legally don’t own?

Shares

Inflation is the biggest destroyer of wealth

Inflation consistently undermines wealth, even in low-inflation environments. Whether or not it returns to target, investors must protect portfolios from its compounding impact on future living standards.

Shares

Picking the next sector winner

Global equity markets have experienced stellar returns in 2024 and 2025 led, in large part, by the boom in AI. Which sector could be the next star in global markets? This names three future winners.

Infrastructure

What investors should expect when investing in infrastructure: yield

The case for listed infrastructure is built on stable earnings and cash flows, which have sustained 4% dividend yields across cycles and supported consistent, inflation-linked long-term returns.

Investment strategies

Valuing AI: Extreme bubble, new golden era, or both

The US stock market sits in prolonged bubble territory, driven by AI enthusiasm. History suggests eventual mean reversion, reminding investors to weigh potential risks against current market optimism.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.