Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 76

Home equity release, the fourth pillar of retirement funding

There has been a lot of focus recently on retirement funding, across topics such as growing age pension payments, longevity, retirement age and costs of living. It is surprising not to hear more on the role that home equity could play in funding the retirement of senior Australians who own their homes.

Intergenerational wealth transfer

The family home is not just a place to live but also a store of wealth. The wealth could be released by simply selling the home, but this creates the problem of where to live. Downsizing is an option that might work for some people. Alternatively there are products which facilitate the separation of the ‘place to live’ and ‘store of wealth’ attributes. The most well-known home equity release product today is a debt product, known in Australia as a reverse mortgage. There are also equity products which involve selling a fixed share of the future sale proceeds of the home.

Our retirement income system is generally viewed as comprising three pillars: the age pension, compulsory superannuation and voluntary savings (including non-compulsory superannuation). Home equity represents a substantial additional pool of savings, and could be viewed as a fourth pillar of retirement funding.

Australian residential property assets have been estimated recently at $5 trillion, around triple the market capitalisation of the ASX. Housing wealth dominates retiree household wealth due to more than 85% of Australians aged 75 and over owning their homes. Substantial levels of housing wealth are bequeathed with annual intergenerational transfer of housing wealth projected at $20 billion in 2014, rising to $35 billion in 2025.

Borrowing to buy a home is effectively buying a large asset ‘brick by brick’ with the principal component of each mortgage repayment. Ideally, a home could be sold in the same way, to provide financial support in retirement. Home equity release products effectively facilitate this.

Retirees might release home equity for reasons such as unplanned medical expenses, home modification, a new car, in-home care services or simply to supplement income to fund a more comfortable retirement. Imagine the difference for some retirees if they could access their home equity to provide them with, say, $10,000 - $20,000 each year for the rest of their lives, rather than living on just the age pension then bequeathing their home when they die.

Tapping into home equity to fund retirement also provides a societal benefit, improving intergenerational equity, or fairness between older and younger generations of society.

The current system, where each generation funds the age pension costs of the previous generation, is breaking down because people are living longer in retirement, ratios of workers to retirees are falling, and the age pension is not well targeted.

The family home is fully exempt from the age pension assets test. This provides a disincentive to unlock housing wealth to fund retirement and worsens intergenerational equity. Many of those bequeathing wealth will have received a part or full age pension, and the benefits that come with that, during retirement. Intergenerational wealth transfer is generally not taxed (other than a tax on some components of inherited superannuation).

Changing public policy on housing wealth

Better targeting of the age pension would increase the likelihood that government can afford to pay pensions at adequate levels to those retirees with no other sources of financial support. Targeting should consider a retiree’s full wealth and means of financial support, including housing wealth. Removing all or part of the family home exemption from the age pension assets test would be politically sensitive - many voters view the age pension as an entitlement, not a safety net, and today around 80% of retirees access either a full or part age pension.

Critical in any change to the assets test is good public policy to avoid unintended adverse consequences. Senior Australians should not be forced to sell their homes. There would be a risk of this if the exemption were simply removed and the private sector did not step in to provide universally available home equity release solutions. Public policy must consider the availability and design of products on offer.

The home equity release market today is small. There are challenges on the demand side for a range of reasons including emotive issues relating to the family home, a lack of product providers and no promotion of the concept by government. The main challenges on the supply side are around capacity.

The November 2013 report by the Grattan Institute entitled “Balancing Budgets: tough choices we need” put forward one approach to utilising home equity to help fund retirement. It involves including the family home in the assets test but mitigating the impact on low-income retirees with high-value houses by allowing them to claim the pension and then repay the value of the pension drawn when the house is eventually sold. It is estimated that this would improve the budget by $7 billion per annum, without undesirable social consequences.

The issue was also touched on earlier this year when the Commission of Audit proposed capping the extent to which the family home is exempt from the age pension assets test, but interest in the topic waned when government rejected this proposal.

Retirement funding should be considered more holistically than it is today. There will be challenges in utilising home equity release and creating a framework that is fair. But as our population ages and our fiscal challenges continue, we must create mechanisms such as home equity release which become a meaningful fourth pillar of retirement funding.

 

Christine Brownfield is an actuary with 20 years’ experience in life insurance and wealth management, and is currently working at Homesafe Solutions, a provider of home equity release products.

RELATED ARTICLES

Ralston on accessing equity in the family home

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

Home equity access and four challenges of retirement

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Survey: share your retirement experiences

All Baby Boomers are now over 55 and many are either in retirement or thinking about a transition from work. But what is retirement like? Is it the golden years or a drag? Do you have tips for making the most of it?

Interviews

Time for value as ‘promise generators’ fail to deliver

A $28 billion global manager still sees far more potential in value than growth stocks, believes energy stocks are undervalued including an Australian company, and describes the need for resilience in investing.

Superannuation

Paul Keating's long-term plans for super and imputation

Paul Keating not only designed compulsory superannuation but in the 30 years since its introduction, he has maintained the rage. Here are highlights of three articles on SG's origins and two more recent interviews.

Fixed interest

On interest rates and credit, do you feel the need for speed?

Central bank support for credit and equity markets is reversing, which has led to wider spreads and higher rates. But what does that mean and is it time to jump at higher rates or do they have some way to go?

Investment strategies

Death notices for the 60/40 portfolio are premature

Pundits have once again declared the death of the 60% stock/40% bond portfolio amid sharp declines in both stock and bond prices. Based on history, balanced portfolios are apt to prove the naysayers wrong, again.

Exchange traded products

ETFs and the eight biggest worries in index investing

Both passive investing and ETFs have withstood criticism as their popularity has grown. They have been blamed for causing bubbles, distorting the market, and concentrating share ownership. Are any of these criticisms valid?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.