Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 167

How angel investors give birth to disrupters

Ben Heap is Founding Partner of H2 Ventures, the manager of the H2 Accelerator programme, which helps to launch early-stage fintech start-ups. Each programme runs for six months, with H2 choosing up to 10 start-ups per round. Typically comprising two to three entrepreneurs per team, H2 looks for a combination of technology expertise, such as a coder or engineer, and financial markets expertise. The aim is to have a marketable product within three to six months. H2 takes a 10% equity share in return for $100,000, and is building a portfolio of 100 or more fintechs.

Ben spoke to Graham Hand at the Sydney fintech hub, Stone & Chalk, on 29 July 2016.

“The point of an accelerator programme is taking raw talent, often with a nascent idea that they think is more advanced than it is, and refining the idea until they have a minimum viable product. Our mission is to help them on this journey.

Entrepreneurs are great at convincing themselves that their idea will change the world. It’s completely different making that into a viable business. We are angel investors, we put a structure around the idea and provide mentoring as they turn the idea into a business. Angel money is often family and friends, while an accelerator is more professional and adds discipline. Angel money is usually $50K to $250K, while seed money is $500K to $2 million, often from an outsider who wants to actually make some money. At the seed stage, the business moves from the two- to four-person founder team who are not being paid, to hiring employees, and paying the founders a bit of money.

Angel money does necessarily require that founders can’t be paid from the money. Everything we do is about giving the founders as much flexibility as possible. If the founder wants to pay themselves, we ask them to carefully consider if it is the best use of the money at the early stage. The mistake an accelerator or angel can make is to spoon-feed the founders, then at the end of the programme, they are in a world of pain because they have to work it out for themselves. We might help with the pros and cons but we let them make the important calls. We want to set them up to pitch their business to seed investors.

It’s not all about the idea. It’s 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration. Our focus is on the individuals and the team and whether they are capable of delivering the idea, or the idea they move to as they start to test it. The majority of teams we back, the idea evolves, or ‘pivots’ as we say. As investors, it’s not only the idea, the key is always execution.

I have described our business as talent identification, similar to a search firm. We look at a lot of applicants, and we have a structured process of screens and interviews. We expect people to read our website and self-select away if they don’t like what we do. It’s not always young people. In fintech, we find an older cohort than other VCs although it’s mainly 25 to 35-years-old, with some older. We want people who have seen a few things, different roles in different places. We look for the ability to cope and apply a skill.

It’s not dissimilar to fund managers. They are often a bit quirky, with an ability to focus 24/7, and a healthy level of self-confidence. It’s important, since most of their smart friends will say, ‘That’s never going to work’ or ‘Nobody will buy that.’ They need enough confidence to push through that when others will stop. But that’s why the opportunity exists. They also need to take onboard the right advice, and they must sift through it, while still owning the problem.

They must work full-time, and a leave of absence from a job is not good enough. We don’t think the project can work without full commitment, they need to forget Plan B.

We have learned the dynamics of teams. When two to four people come into a start-up, it’s akin to a marriage. It’s a long-term commitment. They depend on each other, and foibles will annoy each other. We have made mistakes in not anticipating these problems. We are always improving our legal documents to help founders to protect themselves. Founder shares allow for a claw back of shares if someone leaves early. Of course, you can have advisers and board members who provide advice.

In financial services, regulation is often the biggest hurdle. Despite ASIC’s ‘sandbox’ approach for startups, the time and complexity of the licencing process does not lend itself to the iteration process of a start-up. ASIC needs flexibility to accept new approaches rather than retro-fitting businesses into existing regulations. By the end of the programme, the start-ups should be over regulatory hurdles.

Australian fintech is new so we cannot identify an excellent business we have missed, although there are some terrific founders we have seen who will become incredible success stories at some stage. We meet most of them given our position in the market. Our accelerator may not be right for them, they may be past that stage.

What if the money runs out but the idea is still there? An accelerator model demands they go out and raise seed money. We expect 75% of the ventures in the programme to be successful enough to raise seed money. We don’t put more money in once a start-up is in the programme.

We will move into the early seed money at some stage. We see an opportunity in future for retail investors to invest in a diversified fintech portfolio that is professionally managed.”

 

Graham Hand is Editor at Cuffelinks. Ben Heap is Founding Partner of H2 Ventures.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Being Jon Medved: three decades of start-up investing

How to invest in early-stage tech businesses

Five tips for better startup investing

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Stop treating the family home as a retirement sacred cow

The way home ownership relates to retirement income is rated a 'D', as in Distortion, Decumulation and Denial. For many, their home is their largest asset but it's least likely to be used for retirement income.

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 433 with weekend update

There’s this story about a group of US Air Force generals in World War II who try to figure out ways to protect fighter bombers (and their crew) by examining the location of bullet holes on returning planes. Mapping the location of these holes, the generals quickly come to the conclusion that the areas with the most holes should be prioritised for additional armour.

  • 11 November 2021

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 431 with weekend update

House prices have risen at the fastest pace for 33 years, but what actually happened in 1988, and why is 2021 different? Here's a clue: the stockmarket crashed 50% between September and November 1987. Looking ahead, where did house prices head in the following years, 1989 to 1991?

  • 28 October 2021

Why has Australia slipped down the global super ranks?

Australia appears to be slipping from the pantheon of global superstar pension systems, with a recent report placing us sixth. A review of an earlier report, which had Australia in bronze position, points to some reasons why, and what might need to happen to regain our former glory.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Are these the four most-costly words in investing?

A surprisingly high percentage of respondents believe 'This Time is Different'. They may be in for a tough time if history repeats as we have seen plenty of asset bubbles before. Do we have new rules for investing?

Investment strategies

100 tips from our readers for new investors

From the hundreds of survey responses, here is a selection of 100 tips, with others to come next week. There are consistent and new themes based on decades of experience making mistakes and enjoying successes.

Strategy

What should the next generation's Australia look like?

An unwanted fiscal drain will fall on generations of Australians who have seen their incomes and wealth stagnate, having missed the property boom and entered the workforce during a period of flatlining real wages.

Shares

Bank results scorecard and the gold star awards

The forecasts were wrong. In COVID, banks were expected to face falling house prices, high unemployment and a lending downturn. In the recovery, which banks are awarded gold stars based on the better performance?

Exchange traded products

In the beginning, there were LICs. Where are they now?

While the competing structure, ETFs, has increased in size far quicker in recent years, LICs remain an important part of the listed trust sector. There are differences between Traditional and Trading LICs.

Shares

Should you bank on the Westpac buy-back?

Westpac has sent out details of its buy-back and readers have asked for an explanation. It is not beneficial for all investors and whether this one works for some depends on where the bank sets the final price.

Investment strategies

Understanding the benefits of rebalancing

Whether they know it or not, most investors use of version of a Strategic Asset Allocation (SAA) to create an efficient portfolio mix of different asset classes, but the benefits of rebalancing are often overlooked.

Shares

Six stocks positioned well for a solid but volatile recovery

The rotation to economic recovery favouring value stocks continues but risks loom on the horizon. What lessons can be drawn from reporting season and what are the trends as inflation appears in parts of business?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.