Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 323

How the S-curve helps to find winners and losers

There’s always consistent noise on the macro-economic environment at any stage of the investment cycle. Currently, negative interest rates, volatility and international political affairs such as Brexit and the US-China trade war are the main talking points.

These macro-economic issues do impact market sentiment, especially in the short term, and investors often believe they need to come to grips with them in order to make the right investment decisions.

Structural growth more important than macro trends

While being cognisant of the prevailing market, at Munro Partners, we take a longer-term view. The macro picture isn’t the key to investment success. Instead, it is structural growth that will deliver the strongest returns over the long term, regardless of the economic backdrop or point in the cycle.

As a growth manager, we are looking for structural growth opportunities and identifying and investing in the winning stocks. Earnings growth drives stock prices, sustained earnings growth is worth more than cyclical earnings growth and markets will often misprice growth and its sustainability.

Another way of describing this is the ability to identify S-curves.

In business terms, the S-curve tracks how a company or industry grows over its lifecycle. There comes a point in the lifecycle when growth inflects, driven by a structural change. It is the tailwind created by the structural change that assists a company to deliver and create wealth. The resulting graph looks like an elongated 'S'.

Looking at the S-curve can help investors work out where a company or industry is on its structural transition, or growth trajectory.

Examples using the S-curve

Digital payments is a good example, and one that most people can relate to. In Australia, many people have gone from using cash 100% of the time to approximately 30% in their day-to-day transactions, and instead using cards or mobile phones to 'tap and go'.

Translating this to an S-curve, it means that people started using cards, just occasionally at first and then, as cards got easier, they started using them a lot more.

The network effect is evident: more people making digital payments, leading to more merchants offering digital payments, leading to easier to use digital payment technology, leading to more people making digital payments – and so on. This is how the S-curve first kicks up and continues at an increasing pace.

According to Visa, penetration in Australia is the second highest in the world for tap-and-go payments (after Sweden). Around 90% of face-to-face transactions here are now tap-and-go, and that’s happened in the space of about four or five years. So Australia is at the top of the S-curve, where growth is tapering off.

However, looking globally, the opportunity is still significant. The US, for example, is currently below 10% for tap-and-go payments. Meanwhile, the global average is around 50%. Looking at all the main providers (Visa, Mastercard, PayPal etc), we would estimate that they are approximately 40% through their S-curve, and future growth is still sizable.

Of course, the S-curve trajectory does run out. Smartphones are an example of this.

A decade ago, smartphone penetration was virtually non-existent, and the mobile phone market was dominated by names such as Blackberry, Motorola, Eriksson and Nokia.

Today, over 80% of people with a mobile phone, have a smartphone, and the clear majority of these in developed nations are either Apple or Samsung. Blackberry and its ilk have all but disappeared from the mobile phone market.

However, the smartphone market has now stopped growing. Apple is currently relying on price hikes and its services revenue for growth, not new customers for its products.

We seek to work out the size of the market, the size of the structural opportunity, and where we are in that structural opportunity i.e. are we at the start, the middle or the end of the S-curve? 

We would argue that the S-curve always beats the macro when it comes to investing.

Opportunities for investors

One industry that exhibits the beginning of the S-curve is cloud computing and the shift to software as a service.

We see this as a great opportunity. Globally, IT spending grows at around 1-3% per annum, split into software, hardware, IT services and data centres, as the four main components.

But the spend on IT has changed dramatically in recent years.

Businesses don’t need to buy a server anymore, because they can host all their information and data in the cloud. They don’t need to buy IT support anymore because they’re buying software as a service through the cloud. And they don’t need to spend as much on hardware because they don’t need as much equipment. It’s almost possible to run a business off a smartphone.

While big companies like Microsoft and Amazon have been significant beneficiaries of this trend, we believe there is also scope for smaller high growth software companies to come along and dominate their areas. As a few examples – Adobe dominates the media suite area; Salesforce does CRM; and Atlassian is the go-to provider for developers.

These companies are creating their own network effects globally, just as we saw previously with Google or Facebook.

Their stocks are highly valued but we believe they are still not valued correctly because of the network effect and cash generation capacity as they go through this structural shift.

Picking the trend

Investors also need to ensure they understand the difference between picking the trend and picking the winner.

There’s nothing worse than getting the structural trend right but picking the wrong stock. For example, identifying the potential for Android phones but investing in HTC 10 years ago instead of Samsung. 

Another good example is streaming TV. The thesis is that streaming TV will replace linear TV over a period of time, and most people would probably agree with this. So we are on the S-curve of streaming adoption.

However, many people are talking about who will be the winner in the space and whether Netflix will continue its success story. But the loser here is not Netflix vs Disney vs Amazon. The loser is linear TV channels, all around the world. Many of them will cease to exist in the next decade, if the thesis is correct. And the winners are the companies that provide quality streaming services.

Not every company will succeed, but the key to success is being able to identify the few winners that will succeed from the structural growth tailwinds, regardless of the macro-environment.


Nick Griffin is a Founding Partner and Chief Investment Officer of Munro Partners. This article is for information purposes only and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.



Most viewed in recent weeks

The 20 Commandments of Wealth for retirees

To mark his 80th, we publish a Noel classic plus his timeless commandments for retiree wealth, based on decades of advising clients, writing bestsellers and reaching millions of people every week.

Are you caught in the ‘retirement trap’?

Our retirement savings system is supposed to encourage financial independence but there is a ‘Retirement Trap’ due to the reduction of age pension entitlements as assets and income rise.

The power of letting winners run

Handling extreme winners is a complex task. Conventional wisdom such as “you never go broke taking a profit” often leaves a lot of money on the table as strong growth stocks continue to run.

Tony Togher on why cash isn’t just cash

An active manager of cash and fixed interest funds can achieve higher returns than the cash rate through a selection of other securities while managing both liquidity and income for clients.

'OK Boomer' responses keep on coming

Our sincere thanks for the amazing personal stories of how wealth was built by hard work or where some were not as fortunate. Another 600 readers have taken part in the survey since the last update.

NAB hybrid: one says buy, one says sell, you decide

Differences of opinion make a market, and hybrid specialists disagree on the likelihood that NAB will call one of its hybrids early. It makes a major difference to the expected return on NABHA.

Latest Updates

Should your equity manager hold lots of cash?

An investment with any fund manager should be part of an asset allocation decision, but what happens when your equity manager decides to do a major switch to cash? It messes up your plan.


The moral hazard of a national super fund

If billions of dollars of retirement savings were lost by a government agency in a national super scheme, the cost and risk would be passed back to the government and ‘caveat emptor’ would be history.

Investment strategies

Dispelling the disruption myth

We tend to call any change a 'disruption', but the vast majority of so-called disruptive technologies are variations on a theme. Many innovations are really high-risk, low-probability investments.


Watch your SMSF’s annual return this year

The best way to preserve your SMSF’s favoured status is to make sure the fund’s annual return reaches the ATO on time. There are new rules this year that every SMSF trustee should know.

SMSF strategies

SMSFs have major role but not for everyone

Arguments between segments of the super industry do not foster public confidence. SMSFs are suitable for many who seek control of their own financial destiny, but it's not a competition.