Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 647

Investors beware: Bull markets don’t last forever

Javier Estrada’s latest research, “Expected Stock Returns in Bullish Times,” shines a spotlight on the mathematical drivers of stock returns – and why today’s market exuberance should be met with caution. By analyzing more than 150 years (1872–2024) of US market data, Estrada decomposed annual returns into their primary sources: dividend yield, earnings growth, and price/earnings (P/E) ratio movements. His findings reveal why the conditions for continued outsized gains rarely persist for long, especially after strong bull market runs.

Lessons from history’s bull market runs

Estrada’s review shows that periods of rapid earnings growth rarely coincide with the simultaneous expansion of P/E multiples. In fact, these two have been negatively correlated over decade-long periods (negative 0.5 correlation) – meaning that when profits grow quickly, investors don’t also bid up valuations, and vice versa. This relationship becomes critical when markets reach extreme valuations, as seen in both the late 1990s and today’s environment.

His analysis highlights that the market’s current setup – high P/E ratios, low dividend yields, and optimism driven by recent returns – has some similarities with what occurred in 1999. Back then, the S&P 500 delivered impressive price appreciation, but valuations reached unsustainable levels. When mean reversion finally kicked in, returns over the following decade were disappointingly low (just 0.1% annualized before inflation).

Why high returns are harder to sustain

Estrada’s modeling demonstrates that expecting high future returns when markets are exuberant demands at least one of two things: extremely rapid earnings growth or a large expansion in P/E ratios, or both. History shows these conditions are rarely achieved together – expecting them now is increasingly unrealistic. When fundamentals like earnings and dividends revert toward long-term averages, forward returns plunge. Estrada estimates that if fundamentals normalize, the next decade could produce annualized returns near 0.4%.

Investor takeaways: Valuation over extrapolation

What’s the actionable advice for retail investors? Estrada’s work urges a reset in expectations:

  • Prepare for lower stock market returns over the next decade, especially if mean reversion takes hold.
  • Resist recency bias – the urge to believe recent strong performance will persist indefinitely.
  • Prioritize fundamental valuations (dividend yield, earnings-growth rate, P/E ratios) over chasing performance.
  • Consider more conservative allocations to equities, diversifying exposures to other risk assets such as reinsurance, private credit, infrastructure, real estate, and long-short market-neutral strategies, such as the one used by AQR Style Premia Alternative QSPRX.

Estrada’s decomposition of stock returns over 150 years sends a clear message: The higher markets climb, the less plausible it becomes for all the forces driving returns to remain positive. The negative correlation between earnings growth and P/E expansion means both rarely propel returns at the same time over long periods. Today’s market environment, with expensive stocks and low yields, sets a daunting bar for sustaining recent gains. Justifying bullish forecasts would require a perfect (and historically rare) combination of soaring earnings and multiplying valuations.

Rather than speculate on timing, Estrada recommends paying close attention to valuations and preparing portfolios for more muted returns. Mean reversion – the tendency for markets to drift back toward historical averages – is one of the stock market’s most persistent features. Investors who heed these lessons are far better positioned to weather the eventual turn in the cycle.

For investors, the message is simple: Anchor expectations to history, not hope. Strong bull markets eventually give way to periods of modest or even negative returns—and preparing for that shift is a hallmark of discipline.

 

Larry Swedroe is a freelance writer and author. The views expressed here are the author’s. For informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as specific investment, accounting, legal, or tax advice. The author does not own shares in any of the securities mentioned in this article.

 

  •   28 January 2026
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

US shares: Ambitious multiples on ambitious EPS forecasts

Amid a tornado of headlines, where can investors find opportunity?

This cornerstone of stock market valuation has been left behind

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.