Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 426

It's not high return/risk equities versus low return/risk bonds

A thorough understanding of how sub-investment grade bonds work, and the reasons for their high yield, can help investors discard the ‘junk’ label, and potentially replace it with ‘juicy’.

Interest rates might be predicted to rise in the US but for many months they have been kept notoriously low globally as governments use monetary policy to stimulate economies out of COVID-19 induced lulls. As a result, the return on investment grade bonds has also been low, and not much better than cash. But it is possible to generate equity-like returns from bonds, with a lower risk than previously thought.

What is junk?

Whether going by the name of speculative, junk or high-yield, any bond with a rating less than BBB is sub-investment grade. These bonds are given lower ratings because the issuer is deemed to be less likely to pay the bond back (in other words, they are more likely to default), therefore the investor is compensated for the increased risk with the higher return.

The US high-yield bond market accounts for $US1.5 trillion in issuance, with more than 1,000 issuers that include Netflix, Tesla, Ford American Airlines and MGM.

The Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond Index includes almost all investment grade bonds and accounts for $US60 trillion in debt. Its average yield is around 1%. The smaller Global High Yield Index has a market value of $US2.3 trillion but an average yield of 5.8%. Despite its smaller size, this index generates $130 billion in annual income.

To put that in perspective, the global high-yield market is just 4% the size of the investment-grade market but generates 20% of the income.

Risk versus return

Of course, investing in high-yield bonds is not all smooth sailing, and when the aggregate index is broken down, a negative price return can be observed. That is because over time some of the bonds in the index do default or fall in price when investors start to get nervous about an issuer’s credit standing.

But there are enough bonds in the index – potentially hundreds - to compensate if any one company defaults. And even if a bond falls in value, the yield, or coupon, is fixed and the investor will continue to receive that income.

Since 1996, the US High Yield Index had an average return of 7.8% from coupons and -1.1% from price, resulting in a total return of 6.6%. Since 1986, the US High Yield Index has had an annualised total return of 8.2%. The S&P 500 returned an annualized 10.6% over the same period. Not bad for bonds! 

Bonds versus equity

The elephant in the room here, of course, is that while an annualised total return of 8.2% for high-yield bonds is attractive, it’s not as good as an annualised return of 10.6% which is what the S&P 500 has returned since 1986.

But we’re not arguing that high-yield bonds are a substitute for equities here. Rather, as a yield-producing investment, they can play a role in a portfolio alongside equities, traditional fixed income and other asset classes.

The income-producing features of high-yield bonds are also attractive to investors at certain life stages. Retirees, for example, are much more interested in income returns than capital returns and do not like volatility.

When comparing the standard deviations of the high-yield bond index and equities, high-yield bonds have far less volatility than equities but higher returns than other bond classes, as per the table below.

Another factor working in high-yield bonds’ favour is their lack of sensitivity to interest rate changes, compared to other bonds. Traditionally when interest rates rise, as is expected to happen in the US in the not-too-faraway future, bond prices fall as there is an inverse relationship between interest rates and bond prices.

However, high-yield bonds offer investors higher interest rates over and above official cash rates, and the differential between the cash rate and the bond’s higher coupon is likely to be a much bigger influence on high-yield bond prices.

Furthermore, cash rates usually increase during periods of economic growth, which are positive environments for high-yield bond issuers, as their creditworthiness improves.

A place for everything

It’s time to shake off the traditional idea of high-return, high-risk equities and low-risk, low-return bonds. Every asset class has value in its own right.

High-yield bonds carry more risk than investment grade bonds, but they also offer higher income returns, less volatility and less sensitivity to cash rate movements. All factors which make an allocation to high-yield bonds in an investment portfolio - alongside traditional equities and bond allocations – worth considering.

 

Damien McIntyre is CEO of GSFM, a sponsor of Firstlinks and distributor of the Payden Global Income Opportunities Fund in Australia and New Zealand. This article contains general information only. Please consider financial advice for your personal circumstances.

For more papers and articles from GSFM and partners, click here.

 

  •   22 September 2021
  • 2
  •      
  •   
2 Comments
Ramon Vasquez
September 23, 2021

Hello .

Does NBI . AX qualify as a Hi-yield Bond ?

Best wishes , Ramon .

Warren Bird
September 26, 2021

Good to see someone else championing this asset class, as I did 7 years ago here: https://www.firstlinks.com.au/invest-junk
I stress that you need to get over the inappropriate use of the word 'junk'. That's how this sector of the market started nearly 100 years ago, but these days it mostly just means either highly volatile or highly indebted, but solidly managed. There are household names who've operated as high yield companies for decades without skipping a beat. They might in the future - hence the rating below BBB (investment grade) - but not because they're bad companies.
I'd add that you HAVE to do this via a highly diversified managed fund if you want to obtain its benefits, otherwise you're tail risk could blow the strategy away completely if one or two individual high yield bonds default, as is quite possible.
Over the 7 years since I wrote the article, the high yield fund in which I've been personally invested has done exactly what I expected. Less than the stellar 10% plus that the share market has provided, but delivering a few % pa better than corporate bonds and similar to those multi-asset target return funds that you pay high fees for. And I remind readers that there are many 7-10 year periods where high yield outperforms shares.
As Damian says - worth considering. Talk to your adviser.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

High yield downturn will be long and ugly

Why would you invest in junk?

Are these assets the missing piece in Australian portfolios?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

Division 296: the initial moves to make before the windows close

What if the best superannuation strategy isn't about earning more, but acting before your options disappear? Several overlooked planning windows are narrowing, with consequences that can last for decades.

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Superannuation’s structural failings

Politicians are fighting over access to super, but they may be arguing about the wrong thing. The system’s three fundamental flaws have been hiding in plain sight for decades, costing Australians far more than they realise.

Planning

The great wealth transfer myth

Why do some families preserve wealth for generations while others struggle to? As the great wealth transfer unfolds, the determining factor is often not the structure of the estate, but the preparation of those who will inherit it.

Investment strategies

What comes after bank hybrids?

For years, bank hybrids have been a cornerstone of portfolio income. With tens of billions of dollars now disappearing from the market, investors face a critical question: what comes next, and are the obvious replacements enough?

Investment insights from the US

What happens when knowledge becomes a commodity? The latest themes emerging from the US tech sector suggest AI could reshape company moats, disrupt incumbents and create winners and losers in unexpected places.

Investing

Can Berkshire thrive without Buffett?

Warren Buffett's departure marks the end of an era. But the more important question for investors is whether Berkshire's culture, discipline and capital allocation framework can survive without the man who built them.

Retirement

The Bengen 4% Rule: Lost in translation

For years, retirees have been told to focus on withdrawal rates. But the real question is far simpler: how many dollars can you safely spend? The answer may be very different from what conventional retirement wisdom suggests.

Interest rates

Super low interest rates came with side effects

For more than a decade, investors lived through an era of near-zero interest rates. With bond yields now surging, it's worth asking whether cheap money solved economic problems, or introduced a much larger set of risks.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.