Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 209

It was a good year for shares, but what’s ahead?

The past 12 months have been good for shares in Australia and around the world. In the local market, upward profit revivals in the large miners were triggered by last year’s commodities price rally following the Chinese stimulus announcements in March 2016. South32 (spun off from BHP) was up 74%, Fortescue +49%, Rio +39%, BHP +25%. Also benefiting from the mining and oil rebound were Orica and Worley Parsons, both up more than 50%. (However, share prices in the resources and mining services sectors are still well below their boom-time peaks). The big banks ended up with double digit price rises apart from Westpac dragging the chain. Telstra (telco), Santos (oil/gas) and Newcrest (gold mining) were the only major losses over the year.

Global stock markets also had a good run. The big Asian markets were all up by more than 20%, as was most of Europe, and the US was not far behind. We remained relatively bullish on shares throughout the period despite the regular media frenzies about the potential negative impact of the Brexit vote, Trump victory, US rate hikes and a steady stream of other ‘end of the world’ panics and red herrings that may have scared investors off.

Currency hedged global shares did better than unhedged as the Aussie dollar rose over the year, especially since the Trump election.

Click chart to enlarge for clearer image.

While shares did well, so-called safe haven ‘defensive’ assets were flat. Australian and global bond markets fell as bond yields rose from July (after the Brexit vote in June) to the end of 2016, spurred by early signs of economic recovery and inflation in Europe and Japan and by the Trump victory. Bonds managed to claw their way back up to finish square by June 2017 when yields fell back again as the premature confidence waned.

Listed property markets here and globally were also dragged down by the rises in bond yields in late 2016 but prices recovered a little in 2017. In contrast, unlisted property generated steady returns as rents and capital values continue to remain relatively strong, especially in Sydney and Melbourne.

Three most common questions for the year ahead

In the year ahead the combination of economic recoveries, rising inflation and interest rates in the US, Europe and Japan are likely to continue to favour risk assets like shares more than defensive asset like bonds.

On the three most common questions I receive from investors, the answers remain little changed from the start of the year.

‘Will China slow?’ is a question that has topped the list since the peak of the mining boom in 2011. The Chinese stimulus spending that began in the depths of the GFC has been the driving force in global commodities prices and Australia’s mining export revenues ever since. Global markets sold off during late 2015 on fears that the Chinese government would drop the ball and rely more on structural reforms for growth rather than straight out stimulus spending. In March 2016, the government gave up on reforms and addressing the mountain of bad debts in the banks, and instead said it would increase deficit spending to keep the train running. This triggered an immediate rebound in commodities prices, share prices and credit markets, and the effects carried into 2017.

‘Will rising US rates hurt share prices’ and its cousin ‘Will rising bond yields hurt share prices’ also have the same answers as before the first Fed rate hike in December 2015. The US economy is still relatively weak and cash rates and bond yields are still very low. So far, we are still in the early stages of the economic cycle and this is where rate hikes and bond yield rises have historically not been damaging to share prices. These early stage recoveries are when share prices do best because rate hikes and bond yield rises are more a reflection on confidence in the economic recovery than they are of fears of over-heating.

However, over the past year the jobs market has improved significantly, wages are now rising, manufacturing activity has revived, confidence and spending are improving, and we are seeing signs of inflation returning. As the economy is still weak it has been our contention that the Fed’s plan to keep raising interest rates will probably keep the brakes on the economy, and that should keep bond yields low for some time. In the second half of 2016 bond yields rose with the early signs of inflation and on the Trump euphoria, but yields have fallen back this year and share prices have kept rising.

The answer to the third question, ‘Will house prices fall’ in Australia, has two answers - individual and aggregate. At an individual level, it depends largely on whether you paid too much for your place and if you are highly leveraged and vulnerable to becoming a forced seller when mortgage rates rise or if your income falls.

Watch the implications of a property slow down

In aggregate, there is a bigger issue at stake. If you are a shareholder or an unsecured lender (via hybrids or subordinated note holders) to the banks, then you are financing the current housing boom and your future wealth is highly dependent on the cycle not turning into another bank bad debt crisis. Worse if you have been lured recently into mortgage funds to chase higher yields. You are now a low-ranking unsecured lender to high risk property developers who have been rejected by the banks, or to high risk, high rise unit buyers who also have been rejected by the banks.

The vast majority of home (and unit) buyers bought many years ago and have plenty of equity. They present little risk to the banks as mortgage rate rise. The problem is the flood of buyers who came late to the party and are geared to the hilt. Many thousands of recent buyers and hundreds of property developers will be sold up by the banks and will lose everything. What is not as clear is whether it will infect the banking system enough to force a restructure of one or more of the banks (possibly), and whether it will hurt the broader economy (almost certainly). Another issue is timing - booms can run for years before finally collapsing.

 

Ashley Owen is Chief Investment Officer at privately-owned advisory firm Stanford Brown and The Lunar Group. He is also a Director of Third Link Investment Managers, a fund that supports Australian charities. This article is general information that does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 

  •   6 July 2017
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

It’s the large stocks driving fund misery

Changing times as share investors settle in for the long haul

Winners and losers in sharemarkets, 2017/18

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The investing rule that explains the next market crash

What if investment success depends less on picking the right assets and more on understanding the decisions of other investors? A principle borrowed from game theory offers a different perspective on markets.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.