Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 654

Japan 2026: A new PM heralds a new golden age?

In October 2025, after a string of poor election results, the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) chose Takaichi Sanae to become Prime Minister - Japan’s first female PM. Within months of her ascent, PM Takaichi went to the people and achieved a staggering result – a supermajority of more than two-thirds of the lower house. We believe her election success could underpin an increasingly confident path forward for Japan.

Japan today faces three key challenges:

  • Regaining economic vitality as it emerges from an extended period of deflation
  • Managing geopolitical challenges including tension with China
  • Long term demographic headwinds.

Takaichi PM recognises these issues are best addressed by creating incentives for the private sector to invest and raise productivity. Her reformist policies are pro-business, with focused fiscal stimulus and a dovish approach to monetary policy.

Growing Japan’s economy

Upon her appointment, Takaichi PM wasted little time, announcing a capable cabinet and several councils that are pursuing a growth agenda. Her government has unveiled reform proposals designed to encourage higher corporate capex, such as tax incentives for growth investments and R&D. These incentives set return hurdle rates of 15%, so should promote genuine growth.

To help secure supply chains, Japan’s Growth Strategy Council announced a roadmap for public and private investment in 17 strategic areas including shipbuilding, aerospace, quantum computing, fusion energy, automation and AI.

Most notable is a decision to increase Japanese defence spending. The Takaichi government has committed to raising this to 2% of nominal GDP by the end of FY25 with a potential further increase to 3%. We think these policies are an evolving response to a more unpredictable geopolitical environment and mirror similar increases seen in regions like the EU.

Increased spending should generate new earnings for Japanese defence equipment companies. Indeed defence companies were one of the key beneficiaries of the ‘Takaichi trade’ – the jump back to a record high for the Nikkei 225 straight after the election result. It’s in defence that PM Takaichi is most likely to use her new supermajority to seek constitutional reform.

Japan is back

Takaichi PM’s critics have their concerns. They question how Japan will fund its investment commitments and election promises (including consumption tax cuts) given already elevated government debt. We believe these debt concerns have been overblown in the past and do not see any hurdle to Japan financing its plans.

Intriguingly, Takaichi has said that Japanese corporations should focus on raising wages rather than shareholder returns.1

Recent corporate governance reforms championed by the Tokyo Stock Exchange encouraged companies to reward investors with share buybacks and improved dividends. Japan’s listed companies could pay out 20 trillion yen (US$127 billion) in dividends for the year to March 2026 – double what they paid ten years ago.2 This has been a key driver of Japan’s strong stock market. But do Takaichi’s comments signal a backpedaling on the governance reforms so crucial to Japan’s recent strong sharemarket performance?

Durable growth?

In a word, no. That Rubicon has been crossed and strong corporate governance is now a feature of Japan. It is uncommon to find corporates that do not take their governance obligations seriously. We think corporates will increase business investment, focusing on productivity, growth and business resilience, but not at the expense of shareholder returns.

As we’ve written before, the higher shareholder returns seen in recent years are but a prelude to the main event, namely a deep-seated reconfiguration of Japan’s industrial structure that could underpin prosperity for decades to come.

In our view, shareholder returns delivered without a long-term competitive vision are counterproductive. Therefore, boards should return excess capital to shareholders only if they can’t find compelling opportunities to invest in future growth.

We welcome higher returns, but we prefer to see firms use their capital to secure long-term growth to restructure their business portfolios, secure supply chain resilience and retrain their workforce. We think this is how Takaichi’s comments should be interpreted.

The technology opportunity - AI with fingers

As AI technologies mature, they can be deployed productively across Japanese enterprises, offsetting labour shortages and addressing bottlenecks. Production methods can move from manual to automated. This will require substantial amounts of R&D - and ingenuity.

Here we are upbeat about Japan’s prospects, given the industriousness of Japan’s workforce. Innovation drove Japan’s economic development in the 20th century, and we expect this century to be no different. Already we are seeing promising signs that the reshoring of manufacturing has begun, implying a new virtuous cycle of capex, job creation and higher wages.

In short, the first stage of the “Japan comeback” is now ending. The newer phase - a more innovative Japan - offers the prospect of both higher and more durable growth. And that’s good news for investors.

Morning in America meets the Rising Sun

President Trump visited Japan just a few weeks after Takaichi Sanae’s elevation to PM. Japan extended a warm welcome and in return Trump confirmed closer economic and security ties (as well as acting as a booster for Takaichi during her campaign). We have written previously around how the US/Japan relationship is mutually beneficial, matching Japanese manufacturing know-how with the US drive to rebuild their manufacturing base and boosting economic growth for both countries.

The mammoth U.S./Japan Strategic Investment Initiative, whereby Japan will invest $550 billion in US industry, is especially promising. Encouragingly, discussions are already underway on joint projects.

Japan has formidable manufacturing technology, particularly in precision applications like factory automation and robotics. (The chart below shows the growth in demand for Japan’s industrial robots).

Many commentators believe attempts to rebuild US manufacturing will flounder because the skills of its manufacturing workforce have deteriorated after decades of neglect due to offshoring. Some argue the US private sector doesn’t want to invest in manufacturing, preferring to fund higher return, capital-light sectors such as software.

We are more optimistic. Fortunately, Japan has an abundance of capital seeking investment, thus offering the US the funding and skills required to revive a competitive manufacturing base.

AI could play a crucial role. Today the beneficiaries of the AI boom tend to be makers of semiconductors and chip production equipment. The next phase could be deploying the rapidly improving capabilities of AI into real world applications - ‘physical AI’ – such as AI-enabled robotics and automation that augment or even replace human labour.

In early December, FANUC, the world’s pre-eminent maker of industrial robots and a key Platinum Japan Fund holding, announced a physical AI partnership with Nvidia and unveiled new open-platform, AI-enabled industrial robots that understand human language. We could be on the cusp of a new industrial revolution as physical AI pushes up industrial productivity while generating dramatically higher returns on investment.

A new competitive advantage for Japan

The implications are profound. Advanced manufacturing built on AI and robotics works for a Japan that has a shrinking labour force. For the US, it also removes a large part of the cost disadvantage of local supply chains. That upends one of the most potent arguments for offshoring to countries like China.

This move to reshore advanced manufacturing – and all the productivity gains and supply chain resilience it offers – is exactly what the US-Japan initiative is designed to encourage. This shift should boost growth at Japan’s leading companies and, with a pro-reform government equipped with a large majority, suggests to us that Japanese equities could be a good home for investors’ capital in the second half of the 2020s.

 

1. Shareholder returns includes dividends, share buybacks and capital gains.
2. See https://asia.nikkei.com/business/markets/japan-inc.-dividends-to-top-20tn-yen-for-1st-time-nearing-40-of-profit.

 

Leon Rapp is a Portfolio Manager – Japan strategies at Platinum Asset Management. This information is commentary only (i.e. our general thoughts). It is not intended to be, nor should it be construed as, investment advice. To the extent permitted by law, no liability is accepted for any loss or damage as a result of any reliance on this information. Before making any investment decision you need to consider (with your financial adviser) your particular investment needs, objectives and circumstances.

 

  •   18 March 2026
  • 3
  •      
  •   
3 Comments
john
March 22, 2026

It was sickening that trump raised Pearl Harbour with their PM, considering that was a completely different epoch

3
ian
March 25, 2026

no discussion of the 3rd headwind,demography.
Or isn't it a problem if AI takes all the jobs?

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Is the Paris Agreement on climate change dead?

Why China and Russia's partnership threatens the West

Japan: New dawn or same old story?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Latest Updates

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

Latest from Morningstar

Does an American retirement rule work for Australians?

The 4% rule has survived decades of scrutiny, but Australia's retirement system changes the equation in ways most overlook. Before accepting or rejecting this rule of thumb, it pays to understand what really drives retirement outcomes.

Shares

Glencore lands on the ASX. Should BHP and Rio shareholders switch?

A coal-heavy miner with governance concerns isn't the obvious choice for investors. Yet, Glencore's ASX listing may offer something BHP and Rio can't. The challenge is working out whether the opportunity outweighs the risks.

Why does the system treat capital gains and losses differently?

Investors are often told not to let tax policy drive their investment decisions. Yet, under the new CGT rules, portfolio construction, volatility and even how assets are owned may have an outsized impact on their final outcome.

Economy

Three common sense reforms that Australia needs

What do frozen bank accounts, mortgage traps and pension penalties have in common? They're all symptoms of a system that makes life much harder. Yet the obvious solutions seem to have escaped the attention of Canberra.

Shares

The hidden cost of government debt for investors

Some of the important effects of rising public debt never make the headlines. Research shows the immediate effects may already be unfolding, influencing corporate behaviour in ways that many investors would never suspect.

Investment strategies

When do fundamentals matter?

Is fundamental investing losing its grip on markets? Investors continue to search for valuation-based explanations for every price move, but the dominant force behind short-term returns may be something else altogether.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.