Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 124

Lifecycle funds increase super engagement

Engaging people with their superannuation is the holy grail for the wealth management industry. It’s encouraging to see the work super funds are doing to increase engagement but it’s a slow process. The road to that holy grail is paved with challenges, not least of all the intangibility of retirement, particularly for younger customers.

We believe lifecycle funds and MySuper can play a role in achieving greater customer engagement with superannuation.

Lifecycle funds are not only about returns

Lifecycle funds, otherwise known as target-date or age-based funds, invest in a predetermined way depending on the age of the customer. The asset allocation shifts as the time horizon changes and the customer moves towards retirement.

With lifecycle funds, performance is not the sole aim. The primary focus is the final outcome: delivering a suitable level of income at retirement.

One of the advantages of defined benefit funds, once the mainstay of the superannuation industry, was that they gave customers certainty of income at retirement. Today, defined contribution funds are the norm. But the primary measure for success for defined contribution funds is past performance. Being a backward-looking metric, customers don’t have a future figure they can plan around.

Another prevalent measure of success is performance in relative terms i.e. against a peer group or a benchmark. This can provide fiduciaries with important information about the success of manager selection or the management of business risk. However, it provides no information to the customer about their path to a comfortable retirement. What does it mean to a customer if a fund is a ‘second-quartile performer’? It tells the customer nothing about whether their retirement strategy is on track. And this is partly why engagement is so low.

As an industry, we’re blinkered by performance figures, and it’s critical that a fund performs well. However, it’s just as important to look forward and consider whether a fund will deliver a suitable level of income at the end of a working life. Customers are more likely to be engaged with a fund that focuses on a tangible retirement outcome. A lifecycle fund creates a strong platform for customer engagement, including as part of a MySuper solution.

Lifecycle funds aim to manage the competing objectives of maximising return while minimising sequencing risk. This is best expressed through the metaphor of crossing a river. While a river may, on average, be four feet deep, a quarter of the people crossing the river risk drowning because there are pockets in the river that are seven or eight feet deep. The average depth of the river is irrelevant. Our intention is to get as many people as possible across the river without drowning.

We manage our lifecycle funds actively. The fund manager looking after each age-based cohort aims to optimise customers’ income in retirement and increase the certainty of achieving that outcome. In the early years, it’s about maximising return. As members mature, certainty of outcome becomes more important, while rejecting the temptation to de-risk too quickly. It’s made us think about things in new and different ways.

Take customers on the journey

Communication is critical in reaching that holy grail. We need to focus on whether the fund is on track to meet its objective. This might also serve to dissipate investor concerns about short-term volatility as it reminds customers that superannuation is a long-term investment.

MySuper communications now look and feel different to what people are used to. The reports reflect how each age-based cohort is managed and focus on an expected income in retirement rather than a lump sum dollar value. This will help build engagement (although there is nothing stopping a balanced fund from using a similar form of customised communication).

Of course, lifecycle funds aren’t the panacea for engagement and the issues the industry faces. We need to ensure people do not think lifecycle funds give some sort of guarantee. As with all forms of investing, lifecycle funds remain at the mercy of market risk. The challenge is to talk about this risk openly. Customers need to know about the action they can take to help meet their goals in retirement, such as increasing their contributions or planning to work longer.

The hope is that this will lead to customers participating more actively in their super, such as moving out of default choices. The more people are interested in their retirement, the better.

 

Sean Henaghan is AMP Capital’s Multi-Asset Group Chief Investment Officer.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Reply to Peter: Why a glide path makes sense, with equities for growth

Super engagement better than expected

Are lifetime income streams the answer or just the easy way out?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.