Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 197

New RG97 rules will increase disclosed fees

Many fund managers and trustees are struggling to understand how to apply the increased disclosure obligations of Regulatory Guide 97 – Disclosing fees and costs in PDSs and periodic statements (RG 97) to their business models.

ASIC’s RG 97 requires managed investment fund and superannuation product issuers to provide more detailed data about fees and costs, including from underlying investment vehicles. These changes are designed to create a more level playing field, giving customers greater transparency and allowing meaningful comparisons between products.

Product providers struggling, ASIC extends deadline

The new requirements differ between superannuation and managed funds and implementing them is proving a challenge. One-third of industry attendees at a recent EY forum on RG 97 admitted they were still struggling to understand the requirements.

Recognising these concerns, ASIC recently extended the transition period for Product Disclosure Statements (PDSs) until 30 September 2017 (from the original 1 February 2017) but there are no plans to issue further extensions. PDSs must be fully RG 97 compliant by that date, while periodic statements have until 1 January 2018.

Only 2% of attendees at the recent forum said they had completed the new fee disclosures process. So, what exactly should funds be doing to prepare for and implement the changes and what are the likely impacts?

Interpreting the disclosure requirements for implicit costs

Much of the confusion lies in the complexity of how to calculate implicit transaction costs, with some applications requiring several estimates. While the ASIC guidance does not specifically reference 'implicit costs', it categorises these transaction costs as the difference in price between the purchase and immediate sale of an asset. The limited industry guidance for some of the more exotic assets is leading to difficulty in calculating reasonable estimates.

Making reasonable efforts

RG 97 requires a ‘reasonable estimate’ in determining fees and costs where exact amounts are unknown, but the guidance does not specifically define 'materiality'. Issuers will need to consider industry standards and investors’ perspectives and keep clear records on their methodology and results. Estimates should include the information available, relationships with third-party providers and data integrity, absolute and relative size of costs, relevant time periods and causes of change.

There may be circumstances where issuers are aware that future costs may be materially different to disclosures in the PDS, and this will require an explanation. For example, where a change in investment strategy is planned.

Calculating costs of OTC derivatives

The calculation and materiality of OTC derivative transaction costs is more complex and may require professional judgement because transaction costs are often implicit within the price of these derivatives.

These transactional costs must be disclosed as indirect costs except where fund managers use derivatives for hedging purposes, such as hedging currency or interest rate exposures, in which case they should be disclosed as transactional and operational costs. 

Average fee metrics likely to increase

Overwhelmingly, attendees at our forum said they expect the more detailed fee estimation methodology and diagnostics will lead to a significant rise in disclosed fees. Almost a quarter (24%) expect a high impact because of the changes, with fees rising more than 50 basis points (0.50%). 37% expect an increase of between 20 to 50 basis points, and a further 37% expected a 5 to 20 basis points rise. Just 2% of attendees said they were not expecting any material change in fees.

While ASIC is aware that the new requirements could make some products appear more expensive, the regulator believes cost is only one of a range of factors customers consider when evaluating products. Asset allocation, investment strategy and performance also play a part. Greater consistency, transparency and visibility of fee disclosures will allow investors to make better-informed choices.

Issuers will need to consider how an increase in fees will be perceived by consumers and factor that into their plans. The new disclosures will make it easier to benchmark and compare fees across products and providers. A communications strategy that includes clear, timely engagement with customers should be an essential component of each organisation’s implementation process.

 

Darren Handley-Greaves is a Financial Services Partner with Ernst & Young Australia. The views expressed in this article are the views of the author, not Ernst & Young. The article provides general information, does not constitute advice and should not be relied on as such. Professional advice should be sought prior to any action being taken in reliance on any of the information. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

RELATED ARTICLES

ASIC creates a level playing field on fees

D’oh! DDO rules turn some funds into a punching bag

Authorities reveal disquiet over LIC fees

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.