Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 103

Not all global equities are created equally

The Australian Treasury’s 2015 Intergenerational Report released a few weeks ago makes for mixed reading. Australians are likely to live longer, which is good news. But this also means they will need more income for a longer retirement, which can be challenging.

So far, Australian investors have largely relied on a few traditional sources of income: term deposits, investment grade credit, and high-yield domestic equities. But we believe that a particular type of global equities – those that pay and grow dividends over time – can be an important addition to their portfolios. These 'dividend growers' have historically generated superior total returns with lower volatility compared with companies that pay a flat dividend, declining dividend, or no dividend at all. Some examples of world dividend growers include Nestle, Emerson Electric and more recently, Microsoft.

Market risk versus longevity risk

Investors approaching retirement face a conundrum. On the one hand, they need stable and secure income that can last for the next 20 to 30 years in retirement. But on the other hand, they also need growing income that can protect their purchasing power against inflation. In short, investors have to grapple with both market risk and longevity risk in retirement.

Traditional sources of income such as term deposits provide a fairly steady stream of income for investors’ current needs. But there is a trade-off – they fall short of delivering the growing income that can help offset the impact of inflation.

To be fair, high-yield Australian equities have delivered strong returns in recent years and franking credits make them even more attractive. However, this group of equities has been dominated by companies in just a few sectors. To put this into perspective, as at September 2014, about half of the dividend income from the S&P/ASX 200 index came from the financial sector. As a result, investors who turn mostly to high-yield domestic equities for income face another trade-off. They lose the benefits of diversification that come with investing in a wider range of companies.

Why dividend growth matters

Australian investors tend to view global equities as a homogeneous asset class, typically seen as a growth asset or a diversifier to domestic equities.

But not all global equities are created equal. Our analysis indicates that dividend growers have a unique profile that can be especially useful when it comes to retirement investing.

Dividend growth matters because it can be an important indicator of a quality company. For companies to pay and grow dividends in a sustainable manner over time, they need to grow their earnings and generate free cash flows. Those with the ability to do so tend to have competitive business models. They also need to have robust balance sheets. Importantly, dividend growth can signal the presence of management teams that have a disciplined approach to capital allocation and are aligned with shareholder interests.

Dividend growth can be a powerful signal of a company’s ability to generate long-term value for shareholders and historical data supports this belief. From end-1989 to end-2014, dividend growers around the world delivered an annualised total return of 10.3% in US dollar terms while the broader market returned 8.5%. Dividend growers also outpaced stocks that did not pay dividends (4.5%), stocks that initially paid dividends but then cut them (5.9%), and even stocks that paid constant dividends (7.7%).

Global dividend growers have historically delivered superior long-term returns

Over the same period of time, dividend growers posted lower volatility compared with the global universe. Their returns were also more resilient than the broader market’s in periods of downturn. On average, dividend growers captured just 85% of the market’s downside. By comparison, steady dividend payers captured as much as 97% of the market’s downside.

A complementary retirement tool

The bottom line is: global dividend growers have the potential to deliver superior long-term returns and lower volatility, as well as an income stream. They can also provide diversification to a domestically-oriented portfolio. These characteristics are crucial for investors approaching retirement.

Australian investors looking to manage market and longevity risks should consider dividend growers as a complement to traditional sources of income. By adjusting their investment approach now, they could potentially better enjoy those well-deserved retirement years.

 

Paul Hennessy is Senior Vice President and Country Head, Australia of Capital Group. This article provides general information and does not address the personal circumstances of any individual.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Will ASX dividends rise over the next 12 months?

An alternative asset class for income-seeking retirees

Australia lags global dividend bonanza

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are LICs licked?

LICs are continuing to struggle with large discounts and frustrated investors are wondering whether it’s worth holding onto them. This explains why the next 6-12 months will be make or break for many LICs.

Retirement income expectations hit new highs

Younger Australians think they’ll need $100k a year in retirement - nearly double what current retirees spend. Expectations are rising fast, but are they realistic or just another case of lifestyle inflation?

5 charts every retiree must see…

Retirement can be daunting for Australians facing financial uncertainty. Understand your goals, longevity challenges, inflation impacts, market risks, and components of retirement income with these crucial charts.

Why super returns may be heading lower

Five mega trends point to risks of a more inflation prone and lower growth environment. This, along with rich market valuations, should constrain medium term superannuation returns to around 5% per annum.

The hidden property empire of Australia’s politicians

With rising home prices and falling affordability, political leaders preach reform. But asset disclosures show many are heavily invested in property - raising doubts about whose interests housing policy really protects.

Preparing for aged care

Whether for yourself or a family member, it’s never too early to start thinking about aged care. This looks at the best ways to plan ahead, as well as the changes coming to aged care from November 1 this year.

Latest Updates

Shares

Four best-ever charts for every adviser and investor

In any year since 1875, if you'd invested in the ASX, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods. It's just one of the must-have stats that all investors should know.

Our experts on Jim Chalmers' super tax backdown

Labor has caved to pressure on key parts of the Division 296 tax, though also added some important nuances. Here are six experts’ views on the changes and what they mean for you.        

Superannuation

When you can withdraw your super

You can’t freely withdraw your super before 65. You need to meet certain legal conditions tied to your age, whether you’ve retired, or if you're using a transition to retirement option. 

Retirement

A national guide to concession entitlements

Navigating retirement concessions is unnecessarily complex. This outlines a new project to help older Australians find what they’re entitled to - quickly, clearly, and with less stress. 

Property

The psychology of REIT investing

Market shocks and rallies test every investor’s resolve. This explores practical strategies to stay grounded - resisting panic in downturns and FOMO in booms - while focusing on long-term returns. 

Fixed interest

Bonds are copping a bad rap

Bonds have had a tough few years and many investors are turning to other assets to diversify their portfolios. However, bonds can still play a valuable role as a source of income and risk mitigation.

Strategy

Is it time to fire the consultants?

The NSW government is cutting the use of consultants. Universities have also been criticized for relying on consultants as cover for restructuring plans. But are consultants really the problem they're made out to be?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.