Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 103

Not all global equities are created equally

The Australian Treasury’s 2015 Intergenerational Report released a few weeks ago makes for mixed reading. Australians are likely to live longer, which is good news. But this also means they will need more income for a longer retirement, which can be challenging.

So far, Australian investors have largely relied on a few traditional sources of income: term deposits, investment grade credit, and high-yield domestic equities. But we believe that a particular type of global equities – those that pay and grow dividends over time – can be an important addition to their portfolios. These 'dividend growers' have historically generated superior total returns with lower volatility compared with companies that pay a flat dividend, declining dividend, or no dividend at all. Some examples of world dividend growers include Nestle, Emerson Electric and more recently, Microsoft.

Market risk versus longevity risk

Investors approaching retirement face a conundrum. On the one hand, they need stable and secure income that can last for the next 20 to 30 years in retirement. But on the other hand, they also need growing income that can protect their purchasing power against inflation. In short, investors have to grapple with both market risk and longevity risk in retirement.

Traditional sources of income such as term deposits provide a fairly steady stream of income for investors’ current needs. But there is a trade-off – they fall short of delivering the growing income that can help offset the impact of inflation.

To be fair, high-yield Australian equities have delivered strong returns in recent years and franking credits make them even more attractive. However, this group of equities has been dominated by companies in just a few sectors. To put this into perspective, as at September 2014, about half of the dividend income from the S&P/ASX 200 index came from the financial sector. As a result, investors who turn mostly to high-yield domestic equities for income face another trade-off. They lose the benefits of diversification that come with investing in a wider range of companies.

Why dividend growth matters

Australian investors tend to view global equities as a homogeneous asset class, typically seen as a growth asset or a diversifier to domestic equities.

But not all global equities are created equal. Our analysis indicates that dividend growers have a unique profile that can be especially useful when it comes to retirement investing.

Dividend growth matters because it can be an important indicator of a quality company. For companies to pay and grow dividends in a sustainable manner over time, they need to grow their earnings and generate free cash flows. Those with the ability to do so tend to have competitive business models. They also need to have robust balance sheets. Importantly, dividend growth can signal the presence of management teams that have a disciplined approach to capital allocation and are aligned with shareholder interests.

Dividend growth can be a powerful signal of a company’s ability to generate long-term value for shareholders and historical data supports this belief. From end-1989 to end-2014, dividend growers around the world delivered an annualised total return of 10.3% in US dollar terms while the broader market returned 8.5%. Dividend growers also outpaced stocks that did not pay dividends (4.5%), stocks that initially paid dividends but then cut them (5.9%), and even stocks that paid constant dividends (7.7%).

Global dividend growers have historically delivered superior long-term returnsPH Figure1 020415

PH Figure1 020415

Over the same period of time, dividend growers posted lower volatility compared with the global universe. Their returns were also more resilient than the broader market’s in periods of downturn. On average, dividend growers captured just 85% of the market’s downside. By comparison, steady dividend payers captured as much as 97% of the market’s downside.

A complementary retirement tool

The bottom line is: global dividend growers have the potential to deliver superior long-term returns and lower volatility, as well as an income stream. They can also provide diversification to a domestically-oriented portfolio. These characteristics are crucial for investors approaching retirement.

Australian investors looking to manage market and longevity risks should consider dividend growers as a complement to traditional sources of income. By adjusting their investment approach now, they could potentially better enjoy those well-deserved retirement years.


Paul Hennessy is Senior Vice President and Country Head, Australia of Capital Group. This article provides general information and does not address the personal circumstances of any individual.


Leave a Comment:



Chasing yields is paying dividends

Managing uncertainty in retirement

The comprehensive income product for retirement


Most viewed in recent weeks

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Latest Updates


Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Survey: share your retirement experiences

All Baby Boomers are now over 55 and many are either in retirement or thinking about a transition from work. But what is retirement like? Is it the golden years or a drag? Do you have tips for making the most of it?


Time for value as ‘promise generators’ fail to deliver

A $28 billion global manager still sees far more potential in value than growth stocks, believes energy stocks are undervalued including an Australian company, and describes the need for resilience in investing.


Paul Keating's long-term plans for super and imputation

Paul Keating not only designed compulsory superannuation but in the 30 years since its introduction, he has maintained the rage. Here are highlights of three articles on SG's origins and two more recent interviews.

Fixed interest

On interest rates and credit, do you feel the need for speed?

Central bank support for credit and equity markets is reversing, which has led to wider spreads and higher rates. But what does that mean and is it time to jump at higher rates or do they have some way to go?

Investment strategies

Death notices for the 60/40 portfolio are premature

Pundits have once again declared the death of the 60% stock/40% bond portfolio amid sharp declines in both stock and bond prices. Based on history, balanced portfolios are apt to prove the naysayers wrong, again.

Exchange traded products

ETFs and the eight biggest worries in index investing

Both passive investing and ETFs have withstood criticism as their popularity has grown. They have been blamed for causing bubbles, distorting the market, and concentrating share ownership. Are any of these criticisms valid?



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.