Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 336

The role of retirement villages in retiree housing

In retirement, many Australians need to determine the most appropriate housing option from both an emotional and financial perspective. And the housing options of retirees cannot be ignored by the financial services industry as it works towards delivering sufficient retirement income.

While the vast majority of Australians choose to ‘age in place’ by remaining in their own home, retirement villages’ popularity is increasing faster than any other age-specific housing option (Productivity Commission Research Paper). Prima facie, retirement villages provide a good solution, but currently the offer is complex and requires specialist advice.

Three reasons to move to a retirement village

Retirement villages house around 5% of Australians over 65 years old (approximately 184,000 people) and this housing segment has a number of advantages.

Firstly, transitioning to a retirement village can provide an opportunity to downsize and unlock home equity, and unlocking home equity can be key to sufficient retirement income. Yet according to the Producivity Commission, unlocking home equity is rarely the main driver of moving to a village and the majority of older Australians believe that their current home will not help fund their retirement.

Secondly, retirement villages meet retirees’ needs to feel safe, offer a range of activities and provide the necessary building features, such as non-slip surfaces and handrails.

Thirdly, retirement villages can serve as a gateway to further care such as an aged care facility.

However, there are a number of emotional barriers to moving into age-specific accommodation. A study by the National Seniors Productive Ageing Centre in 2013 cites a 'loss of independence' and 'lack of privacy' as the two most likely factors to discourage relocation to a retirement village. Atul Gawande’s book, Being Mortal, openly details the 'controlled and supervised institutional existence' that can result by moving the elderly into assisted living and aged care facilities in particular.

Financial arrangements are complex

From a financial perspective, the fee structures of retirement villages are complex and vary substantially across villages, making comparisons difficult. Further, the cost of getting it wrong can be high due to significant exit costs in some structures. A Macquarie University economist, Tim Kyng, developed the Retirement Village Cost Calculator after trying to select a retirement village for his mother. The calculator simplifies the various fees down to a single monthly cost, to help compare different options. However, when working through the calculator and the various fee structures, what appears to be a housing decision for retirement looks a lot like purchasing a complex end of life insurance product.

Despite this, legislation remains state based, standardised and comparable fee disclosure principles (think RG97) do not yet exist, and retirement villages are not ‘in-scope’ at the current Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety. On top of the complex contract, individuals also should consider how a transition (and possible downsizing) can affect pension entitlements and their future income stream.

In the absence of better regulation in this area, seeking professional advice is necessary. As advisers consider their value proposition, this is one area that could make a significant difference to the retirement outcomes of their clients. Examples of providers of specialist education and ongoing training are Aged Care Steps and Aged Care Gurus.

Superannuation funds should also consider the role they play as they grapple with designing appropriate post-retirement products, such as Comprehensive Income Products for Retirement (CIPRs). One concept floated was super funds owning residential aged care accommodation options, providing quality social infrastructure, while generating a return for their members. It would be age-specific accommodation provided for the member and owned by the member. The concept might prove an important pillar in unlocking home equity and underpin Australians’ income streams in retirement.

The Australian Bureau of Statistics projects that by 2050, there will be over eight million Australians over 70 years old. The challenges associated with age-specific housing options, the complexity of the contracts, and unlocking home equity are not going away. As we work towards providing Australians with an income stream in retirement and embark on the upcoming independent review into retirement income, we cannot ignore this housing segment.

 

Annika Bradley, CIMA® is an independent member of a number of investment committees and she provides advice to other financial businesses. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any person.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.