Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 317

Review creates challenges for super outcomes

The recently released Capability Review of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) made three recommendations that are specifically aimed at superannuation. These recommendations hold significant implications for how the industry might be regulated in future.

Recommendation 5.1 calls for the establishment of a dedicated Superannuation Division within APRA. This sensible proposal recognises that superannuation differs in fundamental ways from banking and insurance. Superannuation funds invest on behalf of members for uncertain outcomes, and fund trustees have a fiduciary duty to members. Banks and insurance companies make promises related to fixed amounts, and the duty of directors has (traditionally) been to the shareholders that provide the capital. Superannuation should be viewed through a dedicated lens.

Recommendations 5.2 and 5.3 are aimed at cementing member outcomes as a central focus for APRA. This will inevitably change the aspects that it pays attention to when regulating the industry.

The remainder of this article discusses some issues that arise from this shift in focus.

A move from financial stability to member outcomes

As a prudential regulator, APRA’s role is forward-looking and relates to how the financial industry operates and the potential implications. Its mandate spans a broad range of elements, with Section 8(2) of its governing act stating:

“APRA is to balance the objectives of financial safety and efficiency, competition, contestability and competitive neutrality and, in balancing these objectives, is to promote financial system stability in Australia.”

Until recently, APRA pursued its mandate within superannuation by primarily addressing the financial stability of the funds themselves. The Review issues a loud shout for APRA to focus on member outcomes. This gives impetus to a shift that was already underway following the Hayne Royal Commission, both within APRA itself, and through the recent ‘member outcomes’ bill giving it power to take corrective action against funds that are not acting in members’ best interests.

The Review envisages APRA becoming a champion for members, backed up by the structure, resourcing and ethos to do so.

Previous mechanisms have been weak

The broad thrust of focusing on member outcomes is welcome. Although fund trustees have a fiduciary duty to act in the interests of members, the problem is that the mechanisms for ensuring that trustees are doing their jobs properly have been weak. The members themselves do not apply much pressure. Their main disciplining mechanism is through exercising fund choice, but most members lack the interest, knowledge or confidence to do so. Many just accept the default, often on trust.

Gatekeepers like corporate sponsors and financial advisers can exert some influence, but operate only in certain parts of the market. Research and consulting houses offer fund comparisons. However, none of these groups can be relied on to champion member interests in a comprehensive manner.

Having APRA on the look-out for member interests will provide both a valuable check on whether funds are doing what is best for their members, and a source of stimulus for change when required. The fact that funds know that APRA is watching will help ensure they stay in line.

Nevertheless, there are issues around implementation. Member outcomes are delivered at the product and service level. How deep does APRA go? At the top end, APRA could aim to satisfy itself that funds are giving deep consideration to member interests in designing their product offerings and ancillary services such as advice. At the bottom end, APRA might drill down to examine the products or services in some depth. It currently does this with MySuper authorisation.

Will APRA push at a product level?

The Review seems to be implying a deeper product-level focus. Recommendation 5.2 suggests that APRA: “publish objective benchmarks on product performance” and “collect product level data that facilitates accurate assessments of outcomes and comparability across funds”.

Will APRA not just place pressure on funds to adjust their governance structures, processes and behaviours, but also provide direction on product and service design?

How APRA might drill down into the product level in an efficient manner is an open question. What can they handle effectively? How can they avoid regulatory over-burden? How do they share the task with ASIC?

Finally, the APRA Review seems to place store in collecting product level data as a means to identify underperforming funds, and perhaps help drive competition by informing members. More product-level data is definitely needed.

However, past performance often contains more noise than signal. And making past performance the focal point of attention can drive dysfunctional behaviours such as return-chasing, short-termism and performance manipulation. We are starting to see dysfunctionalities from the focus on fees, such as funds passing over investments that may benefit members because they are more expensive. Once stipulated and monitored, a measure can become the target in itself.

APRA might be better off focusing on how funds approach the task of delivering value to members than concentrating on past member outcomes or the intricacies of product design. Why not let the funds work out what is best for their members, and concentrate on whether they are diligently pursuing their fiduciary duty in doing so?


Geoff Warren is an Associate Professor from the College of Business and Economics at The Australian National University.



Leave a Comment:



What exactly is the ATO’s role in SMSFs?

Chris Bowen, Kevin Davis and regulators at CIFR Conference

The state of play in the funds management industry


Most viewed in recent weeks

Unexpected results in our retirement income survey

Who knew? With some surprise results, the Government is on unexpected firm ground in asking people to draw on all their assets in retirement, although the comments show what feisty and informed readers we have.

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

Three all-time best tables for every adviser and investor

It's a remarkable statistic. In any year since 1875, if you had invested in the Australian stock index, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods.

The looming excess of housing and why prices will fall

Never stand between Australian households and an uncapped government programme with $3 billion in ‘free money’ to build or renovate their homes. But excess supply is coming with an absence of net migration.

Five stocks that have worked well in our portfolios

Picking macro trends is difficult. What may seem logical and compelling one minute may completely change a few months later. There are better rewards from focussing on identifying the best companies at good prices.

Six COVID opportunist stocks prospering in adversity

Some high-quality companies have emerged even stronger since the onset of COVID and are well placed for outperformance. We call these the ‘COVID Opportunists’ as they are now dominating their specific sectors.

Latest Updates


10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?


Sean Fenton on marching to your own investment tune

Is it more difficult to find stocks to short in a rising market? What impact has central bank dominance had over stock selection? How do you combine income and growth in a portfolio? Where are the opportunities?


D’oh! DDO rules turn some funds into a punching bag

The Design and Distribution Obligations (DDO) come into effect in two weeks. They will change the way banks promote products, force some small funds to close to new members and push issues into the listed space.


Dividends, disruption and star performers in FY21 wrap

Company results in FY21 were generally good with some standout results from those thriving in tough conditions. We highlight the companies that delivered some of the best results and our future  expectations.

Fixed interest

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Investment strategies

Seven factors driving growth in Managed Accounts

As Managed Accounts surge through $100 billion for the first time, the line between retail, wholesale and institutional capabilities and portfolios continues to blur. Lower costs help with best interest duties.


Reader Survey: home values in age pension asset test

Read our article on the family home in the age pension test, with the RBA Governor putting the onus on social security to address house prices and the OECD calling out wealthy pensioners. What is your view?



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.