Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 143

Smart beta: watch the details

New index-based strategies known as ‘smart beta’ appear to be growing in popularity, but not all these strategies are created equal and investors should be mindful of implementation. These indices seek to outperform conventional market cap-weighted indices by breaking the link between a stock's desired weight and its market cap, instead deriving desired weights from characteristics such as book value, earnings or recent performance.

While many names are used for this approach, smart beta is the most common. The chart below shows assets managed under the smart beta label have grown to more than $US500 billion over the last 15 years. While still a small percentage of the overall market, this growth implies they are becoming a more popular choice. But are they the right choice?

Data show smart beta indices can provide exposure (sometimes inadvertently) to size, value and profitability premiums, but they may do so inefficiently and may subject investors to unnecessary risks. Also, there is no compelling evidence that aggregate long-term demand at the security level has changed because of inflows to smart beta strategies.

Without such evidence, it’s not possible to say that there is ‘more money chasing value’ today than in the past. Instead, flows into these indices may represent a transfer of assets from managers who target a similar set of securities using a more traditional active approach.

Identifying differences in expected return

Just as it is reasonable to expect equities to have higher expected returns than bonds, it is reasonable to expect different securities to have different expected returns. Different stocks can provide different hedging needs and risks. This may be investor-dependent if some investors are the natural holders of certain risks and others are not. Alternatively, in behavioural finance, tastes and preferences drive expected returns without associated ‘real’ risks or hedging preferences. Under either framework, there is a very low possibility of all stocks having the same expected return.

To identify information that can be used to determine differences in expected returns between securities, it is useful to begin with the valuation equation which links expectations about a firm's future profits to its current price through a discount rate. A low relative price is one indication that the market has discounted a company's expected future profits more heavily. Applying the same valuation logic, companies with similar price characteristics but different levels of expected profitability should have different expected returns.

What happens if everyone becomes a value investor? The answer is that it isn’t possible. Collectively, all investors must hold the entire equity market. For every investor who wants to overweight stocks with low relative price, there have to be investors who want to overweight stocks with high relative price.

As long as market participants apply different discount rates to different stocks, a strategy that uses a combination of current market prices and up-to-date firm characteristics can identify those differences today, tomorrow and into the future. Using current prices is the key to identifying these differences in discount rates.

The risk from ignoring prices

While we expect positive size, value and profitability premiums, not all strategies that pursue those premiums are created equal. Investors always have the option to invest in a plain vanilla broad market index fund. This is a decent option as these funds are transparent, low cost, low turnover and well diversified. The success of conventional market cap-weighted indices can be explained in part because they have delivered what they set out to deliver - market rates of return.

However, it is not clear whether smart beta indices will be able to deliver their goal of outperforming the market. Unfortunately, good back-tested research does not provide enough information to make this assessment. The implementation details matter.

For example, if a smart beta index ignores market prices, it is difficult to infer if it will have a higher expected return than the market going forward. In back-tested research, the index may have provided inadvertent exposure to stocks with low relative prices and high profitability, and outperformed the market. If current market prices are ignored in index construction, this implies the index is not directly managing that exposure and may not outperform in the future.

A smart beta index also may generate excessive short-term demand for less liquid stocks and create unnecessary turnover. As the assets attached to that index increase, there may be a drag on returns due to an index reconstitution effect.

So when evaluating a strategy, there are a number of questions to consider, including:

  • Does the strategy use current prices when choosing securities? If a strategy ignores current prices, a vital component of what drives differences in expected returns is omitted.
  • Is there unnecessary turnover? Security weights that are not tied to market cap weights may incur excessive turnover that increases implementation costs without increasing expected returns relative to a market cap-based approach.
  • How is the strategy rebalanced? Trading that demands immediacy from the market can be costly, even if turnover is low.
  • Are there avoidable risks and is the portfolio well-diversified given its mandate? Investors should be cautious about an approach that allows for extreme positions in a few securities. While this can yield good back-tested results, it can also result in significant company-specific risk.

An alternative solution

A better approach is to begin with research into how markets work. A sensible story can boost one's confidence that a premium is positive in theory, while a low-cost approach improves the chances of capturing premiums in practice. No premium is a sure thing. Costs, on the other hand, surely lower investors' net returns. Investors should consider whether a strategy would be a good investment even if the premiums are smaller in the future or do not appear at all.

It’s important to have a solution that will be at least as good as the market portfolio in most scenarios, including if the premiums do not show up. A strategy with high implementation costs will have lower expected returns than the market portfolio if the targeted premiums do not exceed the costs. Keeping opportunity costs low helps a strategy maintain market-like expected returns even if premiums do not appear in the future.

A well-designed strategy that seeks to capture size, value and profitability premiums should minimise its opportunity cost relative to a broad market index. Key tools for doing that include using current prices in every part of the investment process and remaining well-diversified. As well, one should pursue premiums that lead to low strategy turnover and that eliminate unnecessary turnover. The final key is adopting a flexible approach to portfolio management and trading that balances competing premiums and considers explicit and implicit trading costs.

 

Marlena Lee is a Vice President, Research, and Gerard O’Reilly is Co-Chief Investment Officer and Head of Research with Dimensional Fund Advisors, an institutional asset manager with about $500 billion under management globally. This article is general educational material and does not consider the investment needs of any individual.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

The biggest rort of all

The potential of smart beta

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Survey: share your retirement experiences

All Baby Boomers are now over 55 and many are either in retirement or thinking about a transition from work. But what is retirement like? Is it the golden years or a drag? Do you have tips for making the most of it?

Interviews

Time for value as ‘promise generators’ fail to deliver

A $28 billion global manager still sees far more potential in value than growth stocks, believes energy stocks are undervalued including an Australian company, and describes the need for resilience in investing.

Superannuation

Paul Keating's long-term plans for super and imputation

Paul Keating not only designed compulsory superannuation but in the 30 years since its introduction, he has maintained the rage. Here are highlights of three articles on SG's origins and two more recent interviews.

Fixed interest

On interest rates and credit, do you feel the need for speed?

Central bank support for credit and equity markets is reversing, which has led to wider spreads and higher rates. But what does that mean and is it time to jump at higher rates or do they have some way to go?

Investment strategies

Death notices for the 60/40 portfolio are premature

Pundits have once again declared the death of the 60% stock/40% bond portfolio amid sharp declines in both stock and bond prices. Based on history, balanced portfolios are apt to prove the naysayers wrong, again.

Exchange traded products

ETFs and the eight biggest worries in index investing

Both passive investing and ETFs have withstood criticism as their popularity has grown. They have been blamed for causing bubbles, distorting the market, and concentrating share ownership. Are any of these criticisms valid?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.