Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 664

SMSF estate planning: Eight things to consider

Increasingly, super is the next major asset after the family home (sometimes it is the client’s most significant asset, as demonstrated in McIntosh v Mcintosh [2014] QSC 99. It is therefore imperative that any estate planning for your client must also involve planning for their SMSF.

Here are eight things that SMSF trustees could consider:

1. Consider what ‘Armageddon’ is for every SMSF

What is each fund’s 'Armageddon', or worst-case scenario?

This will be subjective for each SMSF.

For example, in a 'husband and wife' fund where the wife always left the running of the fund to her husband, what if the husband suddenly died or lost mental capacity? Could the wife continue with the fund, or would it all be too hard for her?

2. Check the trust deed and (for a corporate trustee) the trustee constitution

It is essential for the constituent documents of the fund to authorise any ‘Armageddon’ strategies to be implemented.

For instance, making a binding death benefit nomination (BDBN) can achieve certainty regarding payment of a super death benefit, and can prevent disputes. However, does the fund trust deed authorise a BDBN to be made? If so, would the BDBN lapse after three years or can it be non-lapsing?

What about the trustee constitution? In a two-member fund with a corporate trustee, if one member dies the survivor can usually carry on as the sole director/shareholder. However, the trustee constitution must authorise this.

3. Amend trust deed and/or constitution if unsatisfactory

If the fund trust deed and/or trustee constitution do not authorise the relevant ‘Armageddon’ strategies, they will require amendment.

Consider also whether the trust deed should be completely updated (a common strategy) or should the amendment be more bespoke (especially where necessary to “grandfather” previous provisions).

4. Discuss ‘Armageddon’ with your clients

If the worst case scenario happened, what are the options? For instance:

  • Could the surviving member continue to operate the fund, perhaps as a sole director of a corporate trustee?
  • Or would it be better to simply wind up the fund and rollover to an APRA-regulated or small APRA fund?

5. Consider using the same trust deed for all SMSFs

If you have clients who came to you with an existing SMSF trust deed, these conversations may be quite different for each of them depending on what their trust deed says.

It may make sense (and ultimately save your clients angst and expense) to have the trust deeds for all clients fully updated to a modern trust deed, well before their ‘Armageddon’ arrives.

6. Ensure all members have valid EPOAs

If all fund members have an up-to-date enduring power of attorney (EPOA), it makes things much easier in the event that:

• A member loses capacity - their attorney can become the trustee or director of the trustee in their place under s.17A of the SIS Act;

• A member departs overseas indefinitely - their attorney can become the trustee or director of the trustee in their place to avoid fund residency issues.

However, you need to ensure (on an ongoing basis) that the person nominated as attorney is not a disqualified person (e.g. someone convicted of an offence involving dishonesty), otherwise they will not be able to act as trustee or director of the trustee in place of the member.

7. Ensure BDBNs are up to date and non-lapsing

The last thing your clients need is for a situation like Katz v Grossman or McIntosh v McIntosh to happen to them.

SMSFD 2008/3 confirms that, with a correctly structured trust deed, a well-written BDBN can provide both certainty and an appropriate and tax-effective succession of your clients’ superannuation death benefits.

Whilst being non-lapsing means not having to remember to renew a BDBN, another issue is that some SMSFs don’t authorise a BDBN to be made by a member’s enduring attorney, so if it lapses and the member has since lost capacity the BDBN cannot be renewed.

8. Change from individual trustees to corporate trustee

For many reasons it is prudent to change from having individual trustees to a single corporate trustee, such as:

  • Ease of administration on the death, bankruptcy or incapacity of a member;
  • Ease of administration if a member departs overseas; and
  • Minimise the risk of incurring multiple 'speeding ticket' fines from the ATO.

 

Michael Hallinan is Special Counsel – Superannuation, for SUPERCentral, an independent online platform provider of SMSFs, advice, legal documentation and wealth management services to accounting and financial planning firms throughout Australia.

Please note that these comments are for your consideration only and are provided to assist you in deciding whether to proceed to obtain a formal opinion on the issue. These comments cannot be relied upon by either you or any of your clients until and unless we issue that formal opinion.

 

  •   27 May 2026
  • 5
  •      
  •   
5 Comments
lyn
June 01, 2026

Oldbutsane, In your position re first sentence. Your last sentence is critical.
Also now in position as P of A for remaining member of fund under corporate trustee and it's a hot mess. Found wheels of law & finance move slowly for latter, plus cost of professional advice to P's of A in order to know how to act in best interest of the member left, under no circumstance from this new experience could I ever think made a mistake in my choice of individual trustees. Understand there are reasons for a different choice but to me, costs of 'end matters' seem massive and more complicated.

npickins
May 28, 2026

Please explain what "Minimise the risk of incurring multiple 'speeding ticket' fines from the ATO." means as it is jargon.

Philip
May 29, 2026

Is your first name "Nit" by any chance? ; )
Agreed, however that writers need to be explicit rather than wander into jargon, or worse (as in this case) meaningless jargon...

1
graham
June 03, 2026

Graham
Real world considerations are
Having a signed Substitute Director Nomination for the Corporate Trustee.

Also, many Banks have changed business practices in a post Hayne world - An EPOA will likely gave access to Bank balances, but little else, i.e. no ability to transact - practice varies by Bank, and in some cases by branch.
If the dominant operator - Director / Member is incapacitated, and the other Director / Member is unfamiliar with Bank operations, then the substitute Attorney, or Alternative Director will need a signed Authority to Operate the SMSF bank account.
Logging in using another's credentials is a complete no no. Such cases have resulted in calls from banks Fraud Departments, accounts can be frozen, and complicated time consuming remedying of such situations ensues.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

SMSFs and the control over estate planning

Limits to a will’s power over an SMSF

Importance of updating your SMSF Trust Deed

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Noel Whittaker’s take on the budget

Marketed as a fix for inequality and housing affordability, the latest budget instead delivers a tangle of tax changes that leave everyday Australians worse off.

Australia has no death duties. Technically.

Australia may not levy formal death duties, but a growing web of tax measures is quietly shaping what wealth passes between generations. Now, the 2026 budget adds another layer.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 662 with weekend update

The debate over the budget is increasingly shaped by frustration and perceptions of unfairness, rather than clear-eyed assessment of policy outcomes.

How inflation is quietly moving the goalposts on retirement

Inflation doesn’t just raise today’s bills - it quietly increases the amount needed to retire, while simultaneously making it harder to save. Three steps to take before June 30th to improve retirement outcomes.

How to minimise tax with a will

Inheritance tax implications in Australia may surprise some, as poor estate planning without proper wills or trusts can lead to costly tax bills and delays for beneficiaries.

Back to the future - Why indexing CGT is a good idea

A return to indexation of capital gains would be a fairer way to compensate households for the effects of inflation than the current discount. Importantly, it opens the door to future, broader reforms to stop the taxation of inflation.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

High quality businesses are on sale

Beneath the dominance of the ASX's largest stocks, much of the market has been left behind. High-quality companies are now trading at levels rarely seen, offering opportunities for investors willing to look deeper.

Investment strategies

The whirlwind is upon us

Something unusual is happening in markets. The winners are pulling further ahead at an extraordinary pace. As return dispersion hits extreme levels, volatility is rising and the investing landscape is becoming harder to navigate.

Strategy

Inequality destabilises economies

Extreme wealth concentration is no longer just a side effect of growth. As inequality deepens, its consequences are shifting from a social concern to a broader threat to economic stability and democratic resilience.

Investment strategies

Have AI’s four horsemen arrived?

AI exuberance is colliding with economic reality. Cracks are emerging as spending surges, ROI remains uncertain and enterprise behaviour shifts. The next phase may look less like an expansion and more like a reckoning.

Taxation

Budget tax changes only scratch the surface. Here are 4 reforms Australia needs next

The 2026 budget has reignited Australia’s tax reform debate, but more work remains. Beneath the surface lies a harder question: what structural reforms are needed to make the country's tax system fit for the future?

Taxation

Negative gearing: quarantined, not killed

The Budget's negative gearing changes defer deductions rather than deny them, yet a worked example shows quarantining can halve the tax benefit's present value for buyers of established dwellings.

Investment strategies

Family offices have quietly taken over Australian private capital

In just four years, Australia's private capital landscape has transformed. We are seeing changes across who deploys capital, how deals are structured and why new platforms and investor pathways are rapidly emerging.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.