Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 235

Summer Series, Cuffelinks Edition 235 with Guest Editor, Gemma Dale

  •   18 January 2018
  •      
  •   

This time of year gives an opportunity to take a break and come back refreshed and renewed for the new year. It is often a time when we have the chance to read, think and consider more deeply those ideas and insights that may not receive our closest attention during busier times. 
 
In the spirit of reflection, and improving oneself, the five articles I’ve found most valuable start with Cuffelinks Special Edition 200 article, collating the two most valuable pieces of advice that over 30 investment professionals would give their 20-year-old selves. This piece becomes richer with every read, and is peppered with gems that will help to improve my decision-making for decades to come.
 
Having spent many years in the public eye as an SMSF specialist, I am regularly asked about property investment within superannuation. The borrowing rules and their application continue to inflate – and then dash - investor hopes and understanding how it works is still limited. Monica Rule’s excellent piece on how those rules apply to property development continues to hold true.
 
For those contemplating retirement, an investment concept that garners insufficient attention is sequencing risk. It's the risk of poor market performance early in the investment period, reducing the potential for longer term performance. Kevin O’Sullivan’s article should be read by all investors and professionals dealing with retirement.
 
I recently re-read Roger Montgomery’s piece, Bubbles and the corruption of risk, quoting Stanley Druckenmiller, formerly of the famous George Soros’ Quantum Fund. Druckenmiller references raisings for credit of dubious quality and Montgomery points to stretched equity valuations as having the potential to create a ‘phony asset bubble’. Nearly three years since this piece was written, equities have rallied strongly and credit markets have suffered no significant correction, but the warnings are there.
 
And finally, life is not all spreadsheets, as Jack Gray reminds us in Poetry for Investors. Sometimes the greatest insights come from the least likely sources.
 
An honorary mention for Alex Denham’s powerful article on the aged care experience of her father. Alex has spent much of her career dissecting legislation governing super, tax, social security and aged care for financial planners and their clients. Ultimately what matters is the experience of our loved ones, and how we care for them.

Gemma Dale, Guest Editor

 

Edition 235 | 18 Jan 2018 | Editorial | Newsletter

 


 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.