Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 171

The other self managed super funds

Australians are living longer than ever before, and many SMSF members are understandably becoming increasingly concerned about their fund’s management should they no longer be able to take care of it themselves.

By 2050, the number of people with dementia is predicted to be almost 900,000, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, and people are now questioning how they would manage their SMSF should they also succumb to the disease or to Alzheimer’s.

A small APRA fund (SAF) may be an appropriate alternative for SMSF members concerned about losing mental capacity or for elderly members who no longer have the capacity or desire for trustee responsibilities.

A SAF is essentially an SMSF with a professional licensed trustee. It provides all of the legislative flexibility available to an SMSF, but without the associated trustee responsibilities and the risk of compliance breaches. Like an SMSF, SAFs are restricted to four members.

Trusteeship benefits

An attractive feature of a SAF is that the trusteeship of the fund is performed by a specialist trustee company and is not related to membership of the fund. In an SMSF, on the other hand, all members must be trustees which can create difficulties if a member becomes ineligible.

A person who lacks mental capacity is unable to be an SMSF trustee. In addition, if a person becomes an undischarged bankrupt or is convicted of an offence involving dishonesty, they are classified as a disqualified person and are also unable to be a trustee. However, there are no legal issues with a disqualified person being a member of a SAF.

If an SMSF member becomes a non-resident, it can be difficult for the SMSF to retain its eligibility for concessional tax treatment. The central management and control of super funds is required to be performed in Australia. However, in a SAF, the professional trustee is an Australian-based company so the central management and control is performed in Australia, even if the member gives investment directions from overseas.

Compliance risk

In an SMSF, the compliance risk is borne by the directors of the trustee company or the individual trustees. The ability to effectively manage the fund’s compliance and investments requires skill, expertise and time.

While many SMSF trustees perform their compliance responsibilities soundly, often with the aid of professional advisers, this is often seen as the ‘boring’ part of running the fund, and the price paid for the investment flexibility and control that comes with an SMSF.

In an SAF though, the compliance risk is borne by a professional licensed trustee whose core business is to provide trustee and superannuation services. The licensed trustee is expected to be skilled and experienced and the common breaches of legislative requirements for SMSFs occur rarely, if ever, in SAFs. In the event that a compliance breach does occur, the professional trustee is responsible, not the members.

In the current environment of strict SMSF administration penalties ($10,800 for the most common compliance breaches) this is an attractive advantage to being a SAF member.

Administration

The administration of SMSFs can vary dramatically between funds, and there are often time delays that result in up-to-date fund information not being provided to members and their advisers.

For example, determining accurate account balances and portfolio valuations as at 30 June each year is often not possible until the annual accounts for the SMSF have been prepared (often in May of the following year).

It is also common for the production of accounts to rely heavily on the SMSF trustee providing timely and accurate information. Many trustees find their funds’ administration and record-keeping requirements even more boring and time-consuming than the compliance responsibilities.

The administration of SAFs is performed by a professional organisation appointed and controlled by the licensed trustee. The administration organisation records all fund transactions including collection of fund income, payment of expenses and asset purchases and sales.

SAF record keeping is timely and accurate because a licensed trustee controls custody of all the assets and receives all the information and transactions directly from external parties. In addition, a majority of SAF members and their professional advisers have 24/7 online access to account information including daily portfolio valuations.

It is not possible for SAF members to choose an auditor, accountant, trust deed solicitor or investment platform. All service providers are appointed by the licenced trustee.  However, all investment transactions are placed via a licenced financial planner or broker chosen by the member.

Investments

Like SMSFs, SAFs are able to invest in property and collectables and may acquire business real property from related parties. Among this wide range, SAFs will require a diversified investment portfolio. The fund members make all the investment decisions and direct the trustee in this regard. However, members are required to remain within the investment strategy, or change their strategy if their circumstances change. The trustee does not make decisions to invest in any particular asset or asset class.

Fees

As SAFs are administered by a professional trustee, there are management fees paid to the trustee which comprise of a tiered percentage fee based on the fund’s assets plus a fixed cost fee to cover statutory expenses. These management fees are in addition to advice fees paid to a professional adviser. The annual tiered management fee is subject to a maximum of $7,500.

The fees charged by Australian Executor Trustees for managing a SAF are outlined below:

A sample of costs for various fund balances is provided below:

On a $1,000,000 fund balance the trustee management fee is calculated as:

  • $250,000 x 1.06% + $500,000 x 0.33% + $250,000 x 0.22%
  • $2,650 + $1,650 + $550 = $4,850

Conclusion

A SAF may be a useful alternative for members who want the flexibility of an SMSF without the compliance and administrative burden of being a trustee. They may also suit those ineligible to be a trustee such as overseas residents, bankrupt, or disqualified people.

 

Julie Steed is Senior Technical Services Manager at Australian Executor Trustees. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

When SMSF members head for the exit

How SMSFs are investing their money

Four common technical questions on SMSFs and super reform

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.