Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 367

Two great examples of why company management matters

The COVID-19 crisis has delivered an historic challenge to health authorities and macroeconomic policymakers alike. For many company management teams, it has above all tested their recent decisions on how they allocate capital.

Adjectives used to describe the past 12 months are losing their meaning; unprecedented, tragic, volatile, worrisome and so on. Throw in some comments about the extraordinary levels of monetary and fiscal stimulus and there you have 99% of the commentary that will review this amazing period.

We do not know what the future looks like, but we are optimistic. Worst-case health and economic scenarios, forecast by some, have not eventuated in Australia. Let’s hope that continues.

Rather than making vague prognostications on what the future holds or predicting how stock markets will react, we share some insights from our investment experience and outline how this shapes our process and portfolios.

Management and capital allocation

It has been said that we can only judge the quality of management decisions made during the good times after the cycle turns and the ‘tide goes out’. Whether it be the need to:

  • write down acquisitions purchased at the top of the cycle
  • repair balance sheets with dilutive equity raisings and dividend cuts
  • jettison assets that are now ‘non core’

... the recent market dislocations have shone the spotlight on management decisions made over the past cycle.

Ultimately, we look to invest the money of our clients in companies run by executives who we trust and view as highly competent. Management teams influence the creation of shareholder value through their decisions on capital allocation.

Here are two examples that illustrate the shareholder wealth that management teams can create when they allocate capital with skill and insight.

Example 1: the battle of the plumbing wholesalers

It’s not only products and business models that create wealth. Management teams make decisions on how to deploy capital and over time those decisions compound on each other leading to potentially vastly different outcomes.

Take the example of two businesses that, on the surface, operate what would seem to be similar business models (wholesale distribution) selling similar products (plumbing supplies) to similar trade customers. If we rewind back to 1998, Reece and Tradelink were generating similar earnings of roughly $20 million a year.

Now let’s fast forward 20 years, a timeframe in which management decisions have compounded their effects on the outcomes for the businesses.

Figure 1: Reece and Tradelink operating earnings 1998 and 2019

Source: Airlie Funds Management

The difference is stark. Reece has produced an 18-fold largely-organic increase in earnings while Tradelink earnings have actually fallen over the last two decades.

What was the difference over those 20 years? We attribute it overwhelmingly to Reece management. The business has been run by members of the Wilson family for decades. They skilfully invested capital in high-returning projects to grow the business and stayed focused on core competencies with the long term in mind. We also believe the family’s significant shareholding (about 75%) of the business over that period further contributed to great decisions on capital. They had ‘skin in the game’.

This owner-managed structure is one we like. We have several such long-term holdings across our portfolios including Reece, Premier Investments, Mineral Resources and Nick Scali.

Example 2: Wesfarmers

If there was ever a good corporate structure in which to examine decisions on capital allocation it would have to be the conglomerate. While there has been much debate on the case for and against the conglomerate, proponents of the structure point to the ability of the corporate centre to make value-accretive capital decisions so that the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. Of course, if we invert this, the risk with the conglomerate is the company trades at a persistent discount to the sum of its parts.

We believed this was the case with Wesfarmers in mid-2016. As the share price chart in Figure 2 shows, Wesfarmers traded sideways for the best part of five years from 2013 to 2018 when return on equity was stuck around 10% (adjusting for write-downs). Few material changes had been made to the asset portfolio and the company was dealing with some poor capital-allocation decisions in relation to the expansion of Bunnings into the UK.

Our analysis indicated there was value trapped inside the collection of assets that could be unlocked and we engaged with management on these views. Around mid-2017, Rob Scott was appointed CEO of Wesfarmers and quickly made significant changes.

Rob and his team skilfully extracted Wesfarmers from the UK, demerged Coles and made other material divestments that amounted to almost $20 billion across 10 transactions. The company’s share price has rallied since this time.

Figure 2: Wesfarmers share price since 2013 ($A adj. for Coles demerger)

Source: Airlie Funds Management

It doesn’t matter until it matters … and it has really mattered this year!

Not only did Wesfarmers management adeptly capitalise on the final stages of the bull market to sell assets at good prices, it built resiliency and optionality into the balance sheet heading into the downturn. This contrasts with how the Wesfarmers balance sheet was positioned during the GFC and should bode well for the company’s ability to make value-accretive transactions at attractive prices.

This focus on the balance sheet and a company’s financial strength is another central component of the Airlie investment process. It helps us identify opportunities such as Wesfarmers, and avoid 'value traps' whereby valuations may seem appealing but with the wrong level of debt for the business model, a company is unable to consistently generate adequate cash flow and returns for shareholders.

Corporate debt levels haven’t seemed to matter to the market over the last few years and some management teams have been lured by cheap debt to fund buy-backs or increase dividend payouts. The economic impacts of COVID-19 have quickly changed the market's view on the importance of financial strength.

Figure 3 shows the outperformance of those stocks in the ASX200 Industrials index with low financial leverage in March and April 2020. 

Figure 3: Outperformance of stocks with low financial leverage in March and April 2020
ASX 200 Industrials Total Return by Net Debt to EBITDA

Source: MST Marquee, Airlie Funds Management

The strength of 'low equitisers'

We have seen over $20 billion of equity capital raised on the ASX in the past four months to repair balance sheets. However, we believe that it is not only in the short term that financial strength matters. Over the long term, companies that are able to fund their operations, including growth, from internally generated cash flows tend to outperform those that repeatedly need to come to the market to raise equity.

This collection of companies that repeatedly require new equity capital, or 'equitisers', have underperformed by 9% p.a. relative to low equitisers on the ASX over the past 20 years. These decisions about how to fund the business tie back to management decisions on capital allocation.

Figure 4: Long-term outperformance of companies with low levels of 'equitisation'

Source: MST Marquee, Airlie Funds Management

 

Looking to the future

We are ultimately optimistic, even though we are unable to predict the future. The government and community response in Australia has kept us in relatively good shape. We are mindful that in the very short term, government policy responses will be key to both the health and economic outlook. Currently in Australia, the Job Keeper/Job Seeker fiscal programmes are due to be removed later this year (update - they have now been modified and extended into 2021). From our discussions with company executives, there is caution on the ramifications for employment and consumer spending from the removal of these programmes.

While the near-term outlook is uncertain, we have confidence in our investment process. It is robust and has been tested through multiple cycles over two decades. We continue to expect those companies with high-quality management teams and strong balance sheets to do well over the medium to long term.

 

Matt Williams is a Portfolio manager for Magellan-owned, Airlie Funds Management. Magellan Asset Management is a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article has been prepared for general information purposes only and must not be construed as investment advice or as an investment recommendation. This material does not consider your investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs.

For more articles and papers from Magellan, please click here.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Investor downside when management controls access to the board

The business case for diversity and inclusion

Companies crying wolf

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

How to enjoy your retirement

Amid thousands of comments, tips include developing interests to keep occupied, planning in advance to have enough money, staying connected with friends and communities ... should you defer retirement or just do it?

Results from our retirement experiences survey

Retirement is a good experience if you plan for it and manage your time, but freedom from money worries is key. Many retirees enjoy managing their money but SMSFs are not for everyone. Each retirement is different.

A tonic for turbulent times: my nine tips for investing

Investing is often portrayed as unapproachably complex. Can it be distilled into nine tips? An economist with 35 years of experience through numerous market cycles and events has given it a shot.

Rival standard for savings and incomes in retirement

A new standard argues the majority of Australians will never achieve the ASFA 'comfortable' level of retirement savings and it amounts to 'fearmongering' by vested interests. If comfortable is aspirational, so be it.

Dalio v Marks is common sense v uncommon sense

Billionaire fund manager standoff: Ray Dalio thinks investing is common sense and markets are simple, while Howard Marks says complex and convoluted 'second-level' thinking is needed for superior returns.

Fear is good if you are not part of the herd

If you feel fear when the market loses its head, you become part of the herd. Develop habits to embrace the fear. Identify the cause, decide if you need to take action and own the result without looking back. 

Latest Updates

Economy

The paradox of investment cycles

Now we're captivated by inflation and higher rates but only a year ago, investors were certain of the supremacy of US companies, the benign nature of inflation and the remoteness of tighter monetary policy.

Shares

Reporting Season will show cost control and pricing power

Companies have been slow to update guidance and we have yet to see the impact of inflation expectations in earnings and outlooks. Companies need to insulate costs from inflation while enjoying an uptick in revenue.

Shares

The early signals for August company earnings

Weaker share prices may have already discounted some bad news, but cost inflation is creating wide divergences inside and across sectors. Early results show some companies are strong enough to resist sector falls.

Property

The compelling 20-year flight of SYD into private hands

In 2002, the share price of the company that became Sydney Airport (SYD) hit 80 cents from the $2 IPO price. After 20 years of astute investment driving revenue increases, it sold to private hands for $8.75 in 2022.

Investment strategies

Ethical investing responding to some short-term challenges

There are significant differences in the sector weightings of an ethical fund versus an index, and while this has caused some short-term headwinds recently, the tailwinds are expected to blow over the long term.

Investment strategies

If you are new to investing, avoid these 10 common mistakes

Many new investors make common mistakes while learning about markets. Losses are inevitable. Newbies should read more and develop a long-term focus while avoiding big mistakes and not aiming to be brilliant.

Investment strategies

RMBS today: rising rate-linked income with capital preservation

Lenders use Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities to finance mortgages and RMBS are available to retail investors through fund structures. They come with many layers of protection beyond movements in house prices. 

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.