Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 148

Unlisted managed funds fight back, even for SMSFs

In recent years, the growth of Listed Investment Companies (LICs) and Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) has captured the headlines, making unlisted managed funds appear old-fashioned and outdated. This is despite the fact that Australian retail managed funds hold about $750 billion (according to Plan for Life), compared with about $30 billion in LICs (according to the ASX, up from about $15 billion in 2012) and about $22 billion in ETFs (according to BetaShares, up from about $5 billion in 2012).

Clearly, LICs and ETFs are making inroads, boosted from 1 July 2013 by the banning of commissions paid to advisers (on new investments) by providers of managed funds, and the increasing use of ASX-listed products. ETF growth has been driven by low costs and interesting product diversification, while LICs have benefited from high-profile managers with attractive deals heavily promoted by brokers. But managed funds still dominate portfolios overall.

What is the evidence managed funds are recovering?

The Investment Trends 2015 Investor Product Needs Report surveyed almost 10,000 investors in October 2015. It showed investors are finding it more difficult to identify investment opportunities in shares, but unlike previous times when they switched to cash and term deposits, now they are hunting for alternative ways to generate income and capital growth. They are turning back to professional fund managers, with 15% of investors saying they intend to invest in unlisted managed funds, compared with 12% two years ago. The gradual recovery in investible assets in managed funds since 2011 is shown below.

Investment Trends also reports an increase in self-directed activity, with ‘word-of-mouth’ and ‘online channels’ instigating investments into managed funds. This shows up in the increase in SMSFs using managed funds, shown below. Surprisingly, the share of people first learning about managed funds through ‘family and friends’ has risen from 14% to 27% since 2012, with 'advisers' falling from 42% to 27% over the same period.

According to Plan for Life, the leading five providers of managed funds are BT (18.5% of total FUM), AMP (17.4%), CBA/CFS (15.8%), NAB/MLC (14.2%) and Macquarie (8.1%).

As further evidence, OneVue reported in its recently released SMSF asset allocation survey for December 2015 that, among its clients, investments in managed funds rose by 5.1% to 28.2% of total assets compared to March 2015, with listed shares falling by a similar amount. Investments in cash and term deposits also fell. OneVue noted that its SMSFs are advised by accountants and financial planners, and these portfolios differ from self-directed.

What type of funds are being used?

The types of managed funds (as well as ETFs and LICs) attracting more attention are:

  • international equities
  • active Australian equities
  • infrastructure
  • property
  • income funds, including bond funds and equity income.

Global funds have become more popular as investors realise the importance of diversifying beyond the ASX, which is dominated by a few banks, Telstra, BHP, Woolworths, Wesfarmers and Telstra. There was also a widespread expectation over 2015 that the Australian dollar would continue falling. While there remains a perception that active fees are too high, more SMSF trustees are turning to active managers because they are less familiar with stocks outside the ASX20.

Infrastructure, property and income funds are all benefitting from the low interest rates offered on cash and term deposits, and the perception of their defensive characteristics.

This final category was probably the year’s biggest surprise, especially in fixed interest. The global bond market is estimated at about USD100 trillion, far larger than the value of all listed companies on the world’s stock markets. Yet traditionally, fixed interest plays a minor role in most Australian self-directed allocations, including SMSFs. Tria Investment Partners reports all types of fixed interest did well in 2015, and “the data shows fixed income is continuing to receive healthy new flows, and more than any other single asset class.”

This is an asset category where managed funds have a much better range of alternatives than LICs (where fixed interest is negligible), although there are several bond and cash ETFs available.

What role is mFunds playing in the managed fund recovery?

The ASX offers a ‘settlement service’ in managed funds, which allows an easier investment process than the painful, time-consuming process of filling out the offer document of a fund manager. Like ETFs and LICs, certain managed funds can be accessed on market in the same way as shares.

The mFunds service can best be described as a ‘work-in-progress’. It has been boosted recently by the addition of new fund managers such as Fidelity and J.P. Morgan, and the first major bank online broker, nabtrade, and now offers a broad range of managers and fund styles. But it can only be accessed through a participating broker, and the two largest retail online brokers, CommSec and E*Trade, are not participating to protect their own businesses (and those of related companies in the CBA and ANZ groups). The total amount invested through mFunds, according to the ASX Funds Monthly Update February 2016, was only $102 million spread across 149 funds. About half that is in fixed income, a healthy percentage. Nevertheless, mFunds is not yet material in the overall picture.

Each product type will have its place

It’s difficult to see a future in wealth management without a strong role for all three structures: managed funds, LICs and ETFs. Both LICs and ETFs are on a rapid growth path, and ETFs in particular will be boosted by ongoing cost focus and the (albeit slow) trend towards roboadvice.

But those who have written off managed funds should recognise it is not only the reigning champion in terms of FUM, but with massive fund manager support, hundreds of millions of capital invested in major platforms, adviser and bank branch distribution and wide product range, it will not relinquish its crown anytime soon.

 

Graham Hand is Editor of Cuffelinks.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Know your fund types and structures – an acronym odyssey

Four ways to invest in the same fund and save money

ETFs are the Marvel of listed galaxies, even with star WAR

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Maybe it’s time to consider taxing the family home

Australia could unlock smarter investment and greater equity by reforming housing tax concessions. Rethinking exemptions on the family home could benefit most Australians, especially renters and owners of modest homes.

Supercharging the ‘4% rule’ to ensure a richer retirement

The creator of the 4% rule for retirement withdrawals, Bill Bengen, has written a new book outlining fresh strategies to outlive your money, including holding fewer stocks in early retirement before increasing allocations.

Simple maths says the AI investment boom ends badly

This AI cycle feels less like a revolution and more like a rerun. Just like fibre in 2000, shale in 2014, and cannabis in 2019, the technology or product is real but the capital cycle will be brutal. Investors beware.

Why we should follow Canada and cut migration

An explosion in low-skilled migration to Australia has depressed wages, killed productivity, and cut rental vacancy rates to near decades-lows. It’s time both sides of politics addressed the issue.

Are franking credits worth pursuing?

Are franking credits factored into share prices? The data suggests they're probably not, and there are certain types of stocks that offer higher franking credits as well as the prospect for higher returns.

Are LICs licked?

LICs are continuing to struggle with large discounts and frustrated investors are wondering whether it’s worth holding onto them. This explains why the next 6-12 months will be make or break for many LICs.

Latest Updates

A nation of landlords and fund managers

Super and housing dwarf every other asset class in Australia, and they’ve both become too big to fail. Can they continue to grow at current rates, and if so, what are the implications for the economy, work and markets?

Economy

The hidden property empire of Australia’s politicians

With rising home prices and falling affordability, political leaders preach reform. But asset disclosures show many are heavily invested in property - raising doubts about whose interests housing policy really protects.

Retirement

Retiring debt-free may not be the best strategy

Retiring with debt may have advantages. Maintaining a mortgage on the family home can provide a line of credit in retirement for flexibility, extra income, and a DIY reverse mortgage strategy.

Shares

Why the ASX is losing Its best companies

The ASX is shrinking not by accident, but by design. A governance model that rewards detachment over ownership is driving capital into private hands and weakening public markets.

Investment strategies

3 reasons the party in big tech stocks may be over

The AI boom has sparked investor euphoria, but under the surface, US big tech is showing cracks - slowing growth, surging capex, and fading dominance signal it's time to question conventional tech optimism.

Investment strategies

Resilience is the new alpha

Trade is now a strategic weapon, reshaping the investment landscape. In this environment, resilient companies - those capable of absorbing shocks and defending margins - are best positioned to outperform.

Shares

The DNA of long-term compounding machines

The next generation of wealth creation is likely to emerge from founder influenced firms that combine scalable models with long-term alignment. Four signs can alert investors to these companies before the crowds.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.