Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 246

Unwinding is warning of late stages of boom

Last year in Cuffelinks, I wrote an article entitled ‘Fear of missing out trumping fear of loss’ in which I highlighted the overwhelming demand for Argentina’s 100 year bond issue, despite the country’s litany of defaults, military coups, and bouts of hyperinflation over the last 90 years. The demand for Argentina’s bond issue was the tip of an iceberg representing investors’ insatiable appetite for returns above cash.

'Fear of missing out' driving markets

From post-80s American art, to low-digit number plates, stamps, coins, wine, and collectible motor vehicles, 2017 saw auction records smashed just as the appetite for Bitcoin, KodakCoin, and any company that added Blockchain or Nodechain to their name, fuelled a fear of missing out that usurped the fear of loss.

Then last month I wrote; “I do not know with any useful accuracy when the US market will turn down more meaningfully than it did last week …”, and I listed many problems facing markets.

The recent enthusiasm for higher return and higher risk alternatives, which always defines the late stages of a boom, has begun unwinding. And the unwinding will have serious implications for equities, especially those companies whose earnings multiples can only be supported by an uninterrupted period of high growth rarely achieved in the business world.

One useful signpost, following a period of unbridled optimism, that an unwinding has begun, is investors in credit markets pulling back, even while equity investors continue to party.

First, let's look at equities

In late January and early February, volatility spiked but investor bullishness and complacency were largely unwavering, especially when it came to tech stocks – enthusiasm for which was reflected in new March highs in the Nasdaq.

One of the most crowded trades has been US technology stocks. Today the Nasdaq 100 is dominated by a few names as investors have piled into index funds that care little about future prospects or value. Apple (NASDAQ: APPL) alone accounts for 12% of the Nasdaq 100 index. Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOGL) at 9.4%, Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) at 8.2%, Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) at 6.9% and Facebook (NASDAQ: FB) at 5.5% are the next four largest companies. A significant part of the gain in both the Nasdaq 100 and the S&P 500 indices over the last year can be attributed to an extremely narrow band of tech stocks.

Immovable bullish sentiment toward a narrow band of similar companies is reminiscent of the heavily-crowded positioning that has marked important market tops of the past.

In the week ending 23 March 2018, investors poured $3.3 billion into the PowerShares QQQ Trust Series 1, the biggest exchange-traded fund tracking the Nasdaq 100 index. It was a cash injection into technology shares not seen since the peak of the tech bubble. J.P. Morgan also reported the biggest weekly inflow ever into equity ETFs in the week ending 16 March of US$34 billion.

Now to credit markets

Meanwhile, US corporate bonds are sending investors a warning. Investment grade bond spreads now sit near their widest level in six months and yields have risen to their highest level in six years. Corporate bond investors are pushing yields higher, signalling the greater risk associated with investing, while their equity counterparts continue to accept a high P/E and prices that imply ultra-long-term growth rates that few businesses have ever achieved.

Elsewhere, current forecasts for US federal government borrowing needs, expected to exceed 100% of GDP by 2028, are brushed aside. By contrast, we have been reminded of the 1980s, when federal publicly-held debt hitting nearly 40% triggered fears of an apocalypse. According to some analysts the demographics were more favourable in the 1980s, and tailwinds existed in the form of productivity growth, financial-sector deregulation, and benign inflation. Today, these could now be headwinds and yet complacency over rising debt and deficits persists.

We agree with analysts who suggest the jump in the TIPS (Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities) market and in Libor spreads to levels last seen in the GFC should be setting off alarm bells because it is a sign that monetary policy has tightened considerably.

LIBOR rates since 2008

Quantitative Easing has been inflationary for property and financial assets including equities, bonds and bond proxies. Quantitative Tapering will at least generate heightened volatility in the same markets. And as volatility increases, cost-of-capital assumptions increase, opportunity costs rise, price-earnings multiples contract and credit stress or merely fears of credit stress become more frequent.

The 12-month annualised Sharpe Ratio for the S&P 500 reveals that the combination of very high returns and very low volatility in recent times is an anomaly last observed in the 1950s. The combination of higher volatility and lower returns is likely to return.

12-month annualised S&P 500 Sharpe Ratio to Dec.31, 2017

Source: Gestaltu, ReSolve Asset Management

The figure below shows that when volatility (risk) as measured by the VIX index, picks up, P/Es (price to earnings multiples) contract. Investors are simply less willing to make optimistic assumptions about a company’s prospects, and therefore less willing to pay higher multiples, when a fear of loss replaces the fear of missing out.

Volatility as measured by the VIX Index versus P/E ratios for S&P 500

Source: Bloomberg, ETF Daily News

There are of course many arguments that suggest portfolios should be fully invested. We agree that in the long run, being fully invested is preferred. But it is also true that the higher the price you pay the lower your return, and holding long-term just means locking in a low return on a long-duration asset.

Prices today are factoring in all of the bullish arguments with little room for setbacks, hiccups, or speed bumps. In the bond market, some investors are already leaving. Those who are patient will be well rewarded for making additional investments only when there is blood in the streets.


Roger Montgomery is Chairman and Chief Investment Officer at Montgomery Investment Management. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual. 


Leave a Comment:



Should you be a value or growth investor?

To zig or to zag?

High or low price, future returns will be low


Most viewed in recent weeks

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Latest Updates


Stop treating the family home as a retirement sacred cow

The way home ownership relates to retirement income is rated a 'D', as in Distortion, Decumulation and Denial. For many, their home is their largest asset but it's least likely to be used for retirement income.


Hey boomer, first home buyers and all the fuss

What is APRA worried about? Most mortgagees can easily absorb increases in interest rates without posing a systemic threat to the banking system. Housing lending is a relatively risk-free activity for banks.


Residential Property Survey Q3 2021

Housing market sentiment has eased from record highs and confidence has ticked down as house price rises slow. Construction costs overtook lack of development sites as the biggest impediment for new housing.

Investment strategies

Personal finance is 80% personal and 20% finance

Understanding your own biases and behaviours is even more important than learning about markets. Overcome four major cognitive biases that may be sabotaging your investing and recognise them in others.

Where do stockmarket returns come from over time?

Cash flow statements differ from income statements and balance sheets, and every company must balance payments to investors versus investing into the business. Cash flows drive the value of the business.

Fixed interest

How to invest in the ‘reopening of Australia’ in bonds

As Sydney and Melbourne emerge from lockdown, there are some reopening trades in the Australian credit market which 'sophisticated' investors should consider as part of their fixed income portfolios.


10 trends reshaping the future of emerging markets

Demand for air travel, China’s growing middle-class population, Brazil’s digital payments take-up, Indian IPOs, and increased urbanisation are just some of the trends being seen in emerging economies.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.