Home / 322

Using equities to generate reliable yield

Regular equity income can help manage longevity risk and exposure to rising prices but finding quality income in equities is not as simple as it seems.

Investors in the later stages of their accumulation phase, approaching retirement and in retirement can benefit from the use of equities as part of their overall income plan. With a rolling 10-year dividend yield of 4.2% excluding ranking (Source: S&P Dow Jones, S&P/ASX200), Australian equities can provide a vastly more attractive income than many alternatives.

Investors face two major risks that impact how much money they have to fund retirement, and how long it will last: longevity risk and the risk of inflation. In simple terms, longevity risk is the risk of outliving your money. Inflation risk is the risk that rising costs (such as healthcare) reduce the purchasing power of your money each year. An equities approach to income can help outpace those rising costs and provide long-term capital appreciation to help replenish funds.

Why does active dividend income investing work?

An active dividend investment approach can add value to a portfolio and generate outperformance through investing in quality companies with strong dividends and dividend growth. The focus is on companies with sustainable earnings growth, maximising the benefits available through the tax and imputation system and tactical allocation to capture a greater share of dividend income.

Markets are not perfect. The first and most fundamental reason that an active approach to income investing works is the fact that the market is relatively inefficient, particularly in the short term. However, some inefficiencies can be traps.

The risk of chasing yield for yield’s sake

Many income investors assume the relationship of current dividend yield to future earnings growth is linear, that is, the higher the dividend yield, the higher the future earnings growth from which dividends are paid. This assumption does not actually hold in the market.

Figure 1: The highest dividend yields do not equate with earnings growth the year ahead

Source: Ausbil, Macquarie Equities.

On average, the top dividend yield companies actually see low, or even negative, earnings growth going forward compared to companies in the 4th to 7th decile of companies, as illustrated in Figure 1. This has been true for the last 20 years.

An active approach does more than simply chase the highest yield, as would a passive approach to yield. An active dividend income strategy can increase income from companies whose dividends are healthy, but maybe not the highest, because they are also investing earnings into a growing business, hence into better earnings growth in the year ahead.

Another quirk of dividend investing is that the highest yielding stocks are more volatile, as illustrated in Figure 2.

Figure 2: The highest dividend payers are also the most volatile

Source: Ausbil, Macquarie Equities

Top decile dividend yielding companies tend to show higher volatility in returns, on average. An active approach seeks to reduce portfolio return volatility by not chasing yield for yield’s sake.

Finally, top dividend paying securities may not be good value-for-risk, as illustrated in Figure 3.

Figure 3: Top dividend paying securities may not be good value-for-risk

Source: Ausbil. Macquarie Equities

Chasing the highest dividend yield companies can provide poor value for risk taken when compared to the market. Lower decile stocks by dividend yield demonstrate a better performance for risk than for the top decile of dividend yield companies.

High dividend payout ratios may also be indicative of a lack of equity reinvestment opportunities for a company into growing its own business. A company with a sustainable dividend profile usually seeks to reinvest some earnings into their business, into positive return projects that can generate earnings growth in the future. A classic example of a high dividend paying company compared to a company which has reinvested some earnings into productive opportunities for reinvestment is the difference between Telstra and CSL.

Figure 4: The dividend journeys of two different companies

Source: Ausbil

It’s not only about dividend yield

Telstra was long considered a key dividend paying stock but the burden of being the largest telco, legacy systems and infrastructure cost, rapid change and limits to growth have seen Telstra lose its status. By contrast, CSL has steadily transformed itself from also being government owned, as the Commonwealth Serum Laboratories, into a global leader in biotechnology. It has balanced the payment of dividends with significant reinvestment into areas that can generate future growth in earnings, as illustrated in figure 4. Of course, these relationships may change over time, but it can take a long time for a company to change its course.

Astute active dividend income approaches can seek dividend yield while avoiding companies with no opportunity to reinvest to improve earnings and returns. With active dividend income approaches, investors like SMSFs, retirees and investors approaching retirement can diversify away from traditional sources of income, like fixed income and term deposits, for a longer-term approach, diversified across high-quality Australian companies. They can do this in equities without sacrificing the potential for long-term growth.

 

Michael Price is Portfolio Manager of the Ausbil Active Dividend Fund at Ausbil Investment Management. This report contains general information only and the information provided does not constitute financial product advice. It does not take account of your individual objectives, financial situation or needs.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Why August company reporting season was poor

It’s the large stocks driving fund misery

Most investors are wrong on dividend yield as income

Most viewed in recent weeks

Most investors are wrong on dividend yield as income

The current yield on a share or trust is simply the latest dividend divided by the current share price, an abstract number at a point in time. What really matters is the income delivered in the long run.

My 10 biggest investment management lessons

A Chris Cuffe classic article that never ages. Every experienced investor develops a set of beliefs about how markets operate.

Lessons from the Future Fund for retail investors

The Annual Report from Australia's sovereign wealth fund reveals new ways it is investing in fixed income and alternatives. The Fund considers its portfolio as one overall risk position with downside protection in one asset class allowing more risk in another.

Four companies riding the healthcare boom

There are strong demographic trends in ageing and consumer spending and investing in the right healthcare companies can ride this wave as well as produce better health outcomes for people. 

Five reasons SMSFs are making asset allocation changes

Substantial changes are underway in SMSFs which until recently held a narrow range of assets dominated by cash, term deposits and Australian equities. Trustees have never faced so many choices.

All’s fair in love and super: why couples should equalise super

Changes implemented by super reforms since 1 July 2017 have brought greater incentives for spouses to equalise their superannuation balances, including tax and estate planning benefits.

RateSetter

Sponsors

Alliances

Special eBooks

Specially-selected collections of the best articles 

Read more

Earn CPD Hours

Accredited CPD hours reading Firstlinks

Read more

Pandora Archive

Firstlinks articles are collected in Pandora, Australia's national archive.

Read more