Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 333

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 333

  •   20 November 2019
  • 1
  •      
  •   

This week, JP Morgan downgraded its global growth outlook for 2020 by 0.2% to 2.3%, blaming 'population ageing'. Then Treasurer Josh Frydenberg said:

"It is estimated that the ageing of the population will reduce annual average real growth in revenue by 0.4 percentage points ... this equates to an annual cost to the budget of around $36 billion ... As our ageing population puts pressure on our health, aged care and pension systems, we need to develop policies that respond effectively to this challenge."

This sounds like a new policy agenda, but the Government has ruled out many changes which might be electorally unpopular. Without heavy lifting and tough-to-sell policies, we are left with:

"However, with Australians in work currently undertaking 80% of their training before the age of 21, this will have to change if we want to continue to see more Australians stay engaged in work for longer."

'Work longer' is hardly a breakthrough policy. Last week's survey on attitudes to generational inequity was particularly timely. While I am not so brazen to claim Firstlinks created two debates in mainstream media, our recent surveys were well ahead of the curve.

The 'OK Boomer' survey received the most personal and heartfelt feedback we have ever received. The 1,800 responses included over 600 comments, many describing the decades of work and sacrifice required to build retirement independence. Pre Boomers and Boomers reveal their years without holidays, working multiple jobs, 18% interest rates and no dining out (although some reminded me of the legendary 'Four Yorkshiremen' sketch. 'Luxury'). Younger generations lament missing the major city property booms, and many will need parental assistance. Leisa Bell summarises the poll results, with complete comments in a PDF report. More feedback welcome.

The other survey on the home in the pensions assets test has also become more widely discussed, although the Treasurer has ruled it out. Our survey results are here. New data from the ANU shows of the $50 billion in total pensions paid each year, $37 billion goes to home owners and $6 billion is paid to home owners in houses worth over $1 million.

Total pensions paid ($billion) by house value and tenure type, 2019-20


Source: ANU Centre for Social Research and Methods, 28 October 2019

We reprise a classic article with Nobel Laureate, Robert Merton, including his surprising views on pensions and reverse mortgages.

Our Interview Series continues with Peter Meany of First Sentier Investors discussing infrastructure hot spots. There are 13 listed infrastructure stocks in Australia (value $72 billion) but 350 worldwide (value $2.4 trillion). The case for investing in global infrastructure is strong.

After a good year, the All Ords Price Index all-time high of 6958 is within striking distance, and the US is in its longest and biggest bull market run in history, up about 450% since its trough on 9 March 2009.

So it is welcome, as Kate Howitt shows, that some semblance of reality and price rigour is being enforced, with active managers refusing to accept over-hyped and over-valued new issues.

We also have reality checks from both Peter Moussa, who sees room to run further but the final steps of the bull are nearing, and leading futurist Phil Ruthven, who describes the new world order as we head into the uncertainties of 2020 and beyond. The Sponsor White Paper from Neuberger Berman reports the most recent meeting of its Asset Allocation Committee.

Early December will be a massive moment for large super funds, as APRA will release its 'heat maps' judging MySuper funds. Dark red is bad. Raewyn Williams explains APRA is also looking for greater innovation and funds must overcome internal barriers to creative solutions.

APRA's Helen Rowell gave a sneak peak at the heat map in this presentation, and warned:

"Unlike a sea of numbers on a spreadsheet, a row of red across the heatmap sends a message so clear and strong it nearly jumps off the screen."

Example of a MySuper heat map on investment performance


Finally, on the subject of Firstlinks leading the debate, the AFR ran a long article on Wednesday called, 'LICs in the spotlight over returns'. Chris Cuffe covered this issue in detail in this 2017 article, pointing out the inadequate reporting adopted by most LICs.

 

Graham Hand, Managing Editor

For a PDF version of this week’s newsletter articles, click here.

 

  •   20 November 2019
  • 1
  •      
  •   
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.