Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 110

What exactly is the ATO’s role in SMSFs?

In 1999 the regulation of SMSFs was moved from the Superannuation and Insurance Commission (subsequently APRA) to the Australian Taxation Office (ATO). At that time, it was suggested that the ATO acquired the role because SMSFs were seen to be just tax play vehicles, not serious retirement funding vehicles. So, in 2015 when SMSFs hold one-third of the $2 trillion or so in super, is it still correct to say that the ATO’s role in SMSFs is just revenue protection? Or does the ATO have a role in ensuring that SMSF members have a comfortable retirement?

Comparing ATO and APRA regulation

Our starting point has been to compare the way that the ATO regulates SMSFs with the way that APRA regulates the institutional super funds it is responsible for (retail, industry and corporate super funds for example) against five criteria.

First, we looked at the main rule which links the way that a super fund is managed with the tax concessions received on contributions, fund income and benefit taxes: that is, how to be a ‘complying superannuation fund’. The compliance test for SMSFs is different to that for the other type of super funds and, generally, it relates to ensuring that the assets of the SMSF are not misused, such as being a liquidity vehicle for a fund member who has an otherwise illiquid asset. What we also saw was that the chances of non-SMSFs falling foul of this rule are virtually zip.

Second, we looked at the ‘covenants’ in super fund trust deeds. Covenants are, in effect, standards of conduct by which the trustee must run the fund. Again, these differ between SMSFs and non-SMSFs and, importantly, the covenants applying to institutional funds are all directed at protecting the members of the fund from mismanagement by the trustee around various risks that members may be exposed to. On the other hand, the covenants by which a SMSF trustee must comply with relate again to protecting against misuse of the fund assets.

One important covenant for SMSFs is that at they have an ‘investment strategy’, which is referenced to things about investing such as having regard to asset/liability, liquidity and diversification. Interestingly, while the ATO will want to see the SMSF’s investment strategy that is about as far as they go. They do not comment on whether it is good or bad. They just want to see that one exists.

Third, we looked at any differences in the application of the ‘sole purpose test’ between the two types of super funds. It’s the principal regulatory tool for SMSFs and it comes from a 1967 High Court decision about whether a Western Sydney solicitor’s super fund, which was running a property development business, was in fact, a super fund (it wasn’t.) In any case, with two exceptions, all the cases on the sole purpose test have involved SMSFs. It’s not a relevant issue for non-SMSFs.

Fourth, we looked at the rules restricting how a super fund invests. Again, with two exceptions, these rules apply equally to both types of super fund, but what we see is that most of these restrictions are about related-party transactions, which is also not an issue for non-SMSFs.

Finally, we looked at the difference in the style of regulation between the ATO and APRA. This is very telling as the way the ATO regulates SMSFs is against breaches of black letter laws, which, necessarily, can only be done after the breach has occurred. On the other hand, APRA is a prudential principle-based regulator, which assesses the risks to members in the way that the super fund is being run and then offers guidance to the trustees about how to manage those risks. Of course, that is regulation in advance of a breach, besides being directed at protecting members’ interests.

SMSF regulation is simply to ensure qualification for tax concessions

Overall then, our preliminary view is that the ATO simply regulates SMSFs to ensure that they are used for the purposes for which they receive tax concessions. For example, all that is required of an ‘investment strategy’ is that it exists, with no opinion on whether 0% or 100% of anything is suitable.

The next stage for us is to compare SMSF regulation with equivalent type pension funds in the US, Canada and the UK, to see how they do it and why. Also, we will have a look at how some other tax preferred funding vehicles are regulated, such as venture capital funds.

So what? Why do we need to know how SMSFs are regulated? Well, they do hold around $600 billion in assets so it would seem sensible to understand how they are regulated and whether this is appropriate, just in case we can make some suggestions for improvement. For example, is it reasonable that there is no guidance given to the trustee of a super fund on how money should be invested?

 

Gordon Mackenzie is a Senior Lecturer in taxation and business law at the Australian School of Business, University of New South Wales.

RELATED ARTICLES

What are wealth industry regulators thinking about?

Latest SMSF updates from the ATO

ATO perspective: ‘only’ 2,184 SMSFs have assets over $10 million

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Welcome to Firstlinks Election Edition 458

At around 10.30pm on Saturday night, Scott Morrison called Anthony Albanese to concede defeat in the 2022 election. As voting continued the next day, it became likely that Labor would reach the magic number of 76 seats to form a majority government.   

  • 19 May 2022

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Survey: share your retirement experiences

All Baby Boomers are now over 55 and many are either in retirement or thinking about a transition from work. But what is retirement like? Is it the golden years or a drag? Do you have tips for making the most of it?

Interviews

Time for value as ‘promise generators’ fail to deliver

A $28 billion global manager still sees far more potential in value than growth stocks, believes energy stocks are undervalued including an Australian company, and describes the need for resilience in investing.

Superannuation

Paul Keating's long-term plans for super and imputation

Paul Keating not only designed compulsory superannuation but in the 30 years since its introduction, he has maintained the rage. Here are highlights of three articles on SG's origins and two more recent interviews.

Fixed interest

On interest rates and credit, do you feel the need for speed?

Central bank support for credit and equity markets is reversing, which has led to wider spreads and higher rates. But what does that mean and is it time to jump at higher rates or do they have some way to go?

Investment strategies

Death notices for the 60/40 portfolio are premature

Pundits have once again declared the death of the 60% stock/40% bond portfolio amid sharp declines in both stock and bond prices. Based on history, balanced portfolios are apt to prove the naysayers wrong, again.

Exchange traded products

ETFs and the eight biggest worries in index investing

Both passive investing and ETFs have withstood criticism as their popularity has grown. They have been blamed for causing bubbles, distorting the market, and concentrating share ownership. Are any of these criticisms valid?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.