Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 561

Why healthcare is a compelling property niche

The healthcare and social assistance sector is an essential and growing industry, accounting for 8% of the Australian economy[1]. It is expected to see the biggest increase in share of government funding from 2022-23 to 2062-63, with government health spending per capita forecast to grow by 2.0% p.a. on an inflation-adjusted basis[2]. However, it’s not all smooth sailing, as evidenced by recent news of private hospital closures[3]. This article outlines the tailwinds and characteristics which continue to underpin healthcare’s compelling investment proposition and explains why we believe medical centres are the specific property exposure investors should prioritise.

Demographics

Growth in Australian healthcare is underpinned by several long-term demographic trends, which are spurring demand for care services. Firstly, Australia is forecast to experience the strongest population growth across developed economies over the next decade[4]. On top of broad-based population growth, there is an even more pronounced ‘population bulge’ now sitting in the 65+ age bracket due to the post-war baby boom. Life expectancy is also rising, up from 78 years (men) and 83 years (women) two decades ago to 81 and 85 today, with the rising trend expected to continue2. These factors mean the number of people aged 65+ will more than double and the number aged 85+ will more than triple over the next 40 years. As we live longer, the proportion of our lives lived in ‘full’ health is slowly declining, meaning a longer period of time where health services and care are needed per person.

 

Increasing disease prevalence

Naturally, an ageing population also means rising disease incidence and complexity. People aged 65+ currently account for 40% of government health spending despite being only 16% of the population2, with 95% of those aged 65+ having two or more chronic health conditions, compared to 59% of those aged 15-44[5]. This is being exacerbated by lifestyle factors, such as poor diets and lack of exercise, and improved medical detection and diagnostics, which are seeing the rates of disease incidence also increase on an age-standardised basis5.

Recession resilient

Healthcare is a defensive, necessity service resilient to changing economic conditions. Unlike other industries that rely on consumer demand or business cycles, healthcare is driven by the constant and growing need for essential health services, meaning healthcare activity expands more consistently and experiences fewer downturns. This has historically been the case even during periods of recession or global economic disruption. In fact, the healthcare sector recorded its weakest performance during the COVID-19 pandemic when most health services were shut down, but still experienced a sharper recovery than the broader economy.

Another key factor that supports the stability and resilience of the healthcare sector is reliable government funding. The state and federal governments fund over 70% of health expenditure in Australia[6], providing a consistent primary source of funding not exposed to economic, consumer or business sector fluctuations.

The resilient and consistent nature of underlying demand and funding are in turn positive drivers of healthcare property performance.

Getting the right exposure

Healthcare property encompasses a range of asset types such as hospitals, medical centres, and aged care. While demand tailwinds are strong and the overall sector provides attractive stability and diversification benefits, the careful selection of sub-sector is still crucial. There are several reasons why we believe medical centres offer the most favourable outlook and are the optimal healthcare property exposure for investors.

A necessary care model

The supply of health services is struggling to keep up with demand, resulting in higher costs and longer wait times. There are inadequate financial and labour to improve care standards or wait times under the status quo – a more efficient and cost-effective system is required.

Part of the required shift includes moving treatment out of hospitals and towards GPs and other primary or secondary care facilities. Focusing on primary and out-of-hospital care can result in better health outcomes[7], reduced risk of infection and improved patient comfort, convenience, and satisfaction[8],[9]. From a funding perspective, out-of-hospital care can be cheaper due to lower overheads compared to when a hospital bed is occupied8.

Avoidable emergency department presentations are clogging the hospital system, with an estimated 1.9 million preventable patient days per annum from those aged 65+ alone[10]. It would be more appropriate to provide this care in an efficient, fit-for-purpose medical centre environment, saving costs and freeing up hospital resources for actual emergency care and complex cases.

The shift from hospital to non-hospital care is already underway, evidenced by growth in primary healthcare spending outpacing spending on hospitals, as well as government policies putting greater emphasis on primary care and preventive health. For example, a $99 million Federal Government initiative to connect frequent hospital users with a GP to reduce the likelihood of hospital re-admission; $79 million to support the use of allied health services for multidisciplinary care in underserviced communities; and $3.5 billion to triple GP bulk billing incentives[11].

Attractive investment characteristics

In addition to demand and funding tailwinds, medical centres offer attractive investment characteristics:

  • High-quality cashflow from a reliable tenant base
  • Inflation hedging, via CPI-linked or fixed rental escalations
  • Long leases, sometimes on a triple net basis
  • Higher rates of lease renewal compared to traditional office[12]

Compared to private hospitals, medical centres may be preferred due to deriving income from a typical commercial lease structure, rather than a percentage of operator EBITDAR. Land also typically comprises a greater proportion of asset value, which can provide downside protection and aid long-term development or change of use potential.

An increasingly important part of the healthcare landscape

Medical centres are an increasingly important part of the essential and growing healthcare industry, representing efficient and fit-for-purpose facilities that can help alleviate the capacity constraints of hospitals and improve the sustainability of the health system.

We believe medical centres’ alignment with demand trends and Government healthcare spending priorities, together with attractive investment characteristics such as CPI-linked income and defensive land holdings, puts them in a favourable position compared to other healthcare property investments.

 

Colin Mackay is a Research and Investment Strategy Manager for Cromwell Property Group. Cromwell Funds Management is a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is not intended to provide investment or financial advice or to act as any sort of offer or disclosure document. It has been prepared without taking into account any investor’s objectives, financial situation or needs. Any potential investor should make their own independent enquiries, and talk to their professional advisers, before making investment decisions.

For more articles and papers from Cromwell, please click here.

 

[1] National Accounts, ABS (Dec-23)
[2] Intergenerational Report 2023, Commonwealth of Australia (Aug-23)
[3] Ramsay Health Care warns of hospital closures as costs blow out, AFR (Feb 29th, 2024)
[4] 10-year average growth from 2024-33 based on UN median population projections for ‘More Developed Regions’ excl. Holy See
[5] National Health Survey 2022, ABS (Dec-23)
[6] Health expenditure Australia 2021-22, AIHW (Oct-23)
[7] How much of Australia’s health expenditure is allocated to general practice and primary healthcare?, M. Wright; R. Versteeg; K Gool (Sep-21)
[8] Out-of-hospital models of care in the private health system, Australian Medical Association (Oct-23)
[9] There’s no place like home: reforming out-of-hospital care, Private Healthcare Australia (May-23)
[10] Health is the best investment: shifting from a sickcare system to a healthcare system, Australian Medical Association (Jun-23)
[11] Federal Budget 2023-24, Treasury (2023)
[12] Exploring Australian healthcare opportunities, JLL (Jun-22)

 

3 Comments
SMSF Trustee
May 24, 2024

I invested my SMSF in a healthcare fund. (It wasn't Cromwell so I'm not having a go at the author of the article or his firm.) It's returned 1.1% per annum over 10 years. It seems to be more a result of the structure of the fund than the performance of the properties, though the latter hasn't been stellar from what I can tell. Part of the problem seems to be that it wasn't going great so the majority of unit holders voted to close it up at the originally scheduled time rather than let the manager keep it going. So they did some fire sales and the 6% per annum income we've been paid got wiped out by a 50% drop in the unit price. The last tiny amount will be paid out soon. By design this investment was quite small in the context of my fund and other property investments in the fund - including a diversified one that had been run by the same manager - have done very well. But ultimately I think that this kind of argument is great marketing for property fund spruikers, without necessarily resulting in a great result for investors. I don't doubt all the factors that Colin has outlined in the article, but that story's been around for a decade or so now so I'm far from convinced that it means those properties will perform well if they're in a fund that has a wind-up date.

Jack
May 24, 2024

SMSF Trustee,

I am in property funds management (not Cromwell) and there's a lot of smart money taking the other side of that bet. Blackrock and HMC Capital included.

SMSF Trustee
May 26, 2024

Jack, fair enough. Though calling a manager the "smart money" doesn't mean the story will turn into outperforming investment returns.
Lots of smart people have made poor calls over the years.

So answer me this. How smart is it to back a strategy that's so much in the public domain already that there's an article on Firstlinks about it? Please justify why these arguments are not already factored into the purchase price of health properties? Telling me that Manager X is doing it doesn't prove a thing.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Aged care and the Intergenerational Report

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Vale Graham Hand

It’s with heavy hearts that we announce Firstlinks’ co-founder and former Managing Editor, Graham Hand, has died aged 66. Graham was a legendary figure in the finance industry and here are three tributes to him.

Warren Buffett is preparing for a bear market. Should you?

Berkshire Hathaway’s third quarter earnings update reveals Buffett is selling stocks and building record cash reserves. Here’s a look at his track record in calling market tops and whether you should follow his lead and dial down risk.

What will be your legacy?

As we get older, many of us start to think about how we’ll be remembered by those left behind. This looks at why that may not be the best strategy to ensure that you live life well and leave loved ones in good stead.

It's the cost of government, stupid

Australia's bloated government sector is every bit as responsible for our economic worries as the cost of living crisis. Grand schemes like the 'Future Made in Australia' only look set to make it worse.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 584 with weekend update

A new report shows Australian fund managers performed better in the first half of the year, with most outperforming indices in local equities, small and mid-caps, and bonds. Their results are less impressive over longer periods.

  • 31 October 2024

A guide to valuing SMSF assets correctly

SMSF trustees are required to value all fund assets, including property, at market value when preparing the fund's financial statements each year. Here are some key tips to ensure that you get it right.

Latest Updates

Retirement

Is the Retirement Income Covenant really the right answer?

The world and Australia’s retirement landscape have changed a lot since 2020. If the RIC is to achieve its goals, a wider spread of responsibility and a rethink across all five pillars of retirement planning are needed.

Superannuation

Are mega super funds’ returns set to fall?

While the performance of the largest super funds has been admirable, they’ve become so big that it will make it difficult for them to outperform their benchmarks in future. It will be important for you to pick your fund wisely.

Superannuation

Australia’s shameful super gap

ASFA provides a key guide for how much you will need to live on in retirement. Unfortunately it has many deficiencies, and the averages don't tell the full story of the growing gender superannuation gap.

Shares

How will stocks fare with a smaller US government?

Less government involvement in the economy and markets is long overdue. But investors need to consider what a reduced government role may mean for the profitability of businesses that are unable to offset rising cost pressures.

Exchange traded products

Where is peak ETF?

The market share for Exchange Traded Funds and index trackers may increase past optimal levels and stay there for many years. There seems very little if anything that active managers can do to reverse that.

Insurance

Solvency risk with lifetime annuity providers

Any discussion on annuities needs to address the credit risk associated with relying on the solvency of a single insurer. Here's a guide on the regulation of annuities and the best ways to assess solvency risk. 

Planning

Can a crime invalidate a will?

A person's criminal record can impact whether they can benefit under a will or remain as an executor, trustee or testamentary guardian. A lot depends on the nature of the crime. 

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.