Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 348

Worried about low rates, SMSFs drop banks and diversify

SMSFs are well-known for holding substantially greater allocations to cash and Australian shares than professional investors, while being underweight fixed income and international shares. They're also known for heavy allocations to high-yielding Australian shares, particularly financials.

But new nabtrade analysis suggests some of these allocations may be changing as ultra-low interest rates start to bite, and global and domestic markets reward risk-taking behaviour.

How allocations are changing

nabtrade SMSF trustees have reduced their allocation to banks by nearly 25% over the last four years, while increasing their allocations to diversified instruments such as ETFs and international share funds.

In 2019, SMSFs were net sellers of Australian equities in the first six months, taking profits as the S&P/ASX200 rallied, then they resumed buying as prices fell in July and August. Selling into rallies and buying on price weakness reflects the contrarian behaviour we typically see from our SMSF investors.

In addition to diversifying their portfolios to reduce exposure to banks and other overweight sectors, it's likely some investors were seeking to prevent a fall in their income should a future government ban the rebate of franking credits in a no or low tax environment.

Despite the reduction in financials, which fell 5% in 2019 alone, bank shares remain the most-held stocks by SMSFs, taking the four top holdings.

SMSFs also hold larger amounts of Woodside Petroleum, Transurban and Macquarie than non-SMSF investors.

Given the preference for high-yielding bank shares, many SMSFs have missed out on one of the biggest success stories on the ASX, with only 11% of nabtrade SMSFs holding global biotechnology company CSL. CSL is now the second largest stock on the ASX (and has been the first, dependng on when the market cap is measured), up over 50% in 2019 and 250% over five years.

Those SMSFs who do hold CSL are high conviction, with an average holding of over $150,000 versus $40,000 for Telstra. SMSF holdings of healthcare stocks has increased from 6% to 9% over four years.

Telstra was sold down throughout 2019 as its price strengthened, with 38% of SMSFs holding it at the beginning of the year, and only 34% holding it in December.

SMSFs also loosened their grip on BHP, ending the year with holdings down from 5% to 4.3% despite an increase of 18% in the price.

SMSF adoption of ETFs

SMSF trustees were early adopters of Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) with growth continuing in 2019. At the beginning of 2020, SMSFs held $20,000 more in diversified products (including ETFs, listed investment trusts and companies and mFunds) than at the beginning of 2019, of which 58% came from net buying (42% from market growth).

SMSFs took up increasing parcels of the large fixed interest Listed Investment Trusts (LITs) brought to market in 2019. Popular ETFs and mFunds also included those with exposure to international shares and fixed income. ETFs accounted for 8% of net buys in 2019.

The start of 2020 has been marked by a return to volatility, with coronavirus fears hanging over a market that had only recently reached record highs. nabtrade SMSF investors tend to respond less to volatility than other investors, and may see price falls as an opportunity to top up on favoured stocks. Interestingly, the cash position of nabtrade’s SMSFs was largely unchanged throughout 2019, leaving plenty of trustees with dry powder should further declines in domestic and international shares present good value.

 

Gemma Dale is Director of SMSF and Investor Behaviour at nabtrade, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This material has been prepared as general information only, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs.

For more articles and papers from nabtrade, please click here.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Changing times as share investors settle in for the long haul

Headwinds and tailwinds, a decade in review

It’s the large stocks driving fund misery

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.