Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 332

Your retirement: sunset beach walk or a diet of canned tuna?

Can Australians look forward to increased leisure time in their retirement years, or do they face days of penny-pinching?

The effectiveness of our superannuation and retirement income system in providing a reasonable standard of living for all is a long-running topic of debate in Australia. But certain parts of our system have been held up as a gold standard in a white paper prepared by Morningstar's US head of retirement research David Blanchett and behavioural research lead, Steve Wendel.

In Debating the state of retirement: Morningstar researchers agree to disagree, the pair discuss America's retirement savings regime, including:

  • Whether there is a retirement savings crisis unfolding in the US
  • Would the Australian system of superannuation work there
  • The viability of compulsory employer or employee pension contributions
  • Why people love Social Security but dislike annuities.

Their discussion is pertinent for Australians because of the recently kick-started Retirement Income Review. Just last week, Treasurer Josh Frydenberg effectively relaunched the government's review of retirement – albeit with a watered-down aim to “provide a fact base to inform policy development” rather than specific recommendations for change.

The fraught issue of retirement savings is also looming large in the US, where Morningstar's Wendel suggests society has decided older citizens should also be able to live comfortably in retirement, and be able to transition into this life-stage without a significant shock.

"In my research, over 50 per cent of mass affluent Americans are likely to face a significant shock, and even more of everyday Americans," he says.

However, Blanchett stops short of calling this a looming crisis, suggesting the reality of retirement for most people will be somewhere between the idealistic picture of regular sunset beach walks and the worst-case scenario of subsisting on a diet of canned tuna.

"It is true that many retirees will face shortfalls when they retire because they aren’t saving enough, but I wouldn’t call it a crisis because people seem to make things work and they have Social Security benefits.

"If you look at a recent poll by Vanguard, while half of people think there’s a crisis, relatively few people describe their situation as a crisis in Canada, the US, the UK, and Australia," Blanchett says.

But Wendel disagrees, making the point that just because humans have a natural tendency to adapt to adversity doesn't mean they should have to.

"If you beat someone up and take all of their money, eventually they will adapt. They will probably become relatively happy again.

"The question at hand isn’t whether people adapt and can find happiness. Of course, they do. It’s rather whether they should have to," Wendel says.

Social Security versus the Age Pension

The US's safety net of Social Security – in our case, the Age Pension – is a perennial issue in politics and a fierce battleground for Australia's major political parties.

A polarising point is the use of the family home in the assets test that determines eligibility for the Age Pension. The Australian government has also included several non-super assets in its Retirement Income Review terms of reference, as referred to recently by Graham Hand, managing editor of FirstLinks. These non-super assets include:

  • a means-tested age pension
  • voluntary savings, including home ownership.
  • compulsory superannuation.

The final point above is another key topic raised by Blanchett and Wendel, as they compare the US's relatively recent introduction of "auto-enrolment" with Australia's system of mandatory superannuation contributions by employers.

"Auto enrolment is the single most powerful tool that I think anyone has found to increase savings rates," says Wendel.

Introduced in 2012, US employers are encouraged – though not mandated – to auto-enrol new employees into contributing between 3 per cent and 6 per cent of their income into a pension plan, known as a 401(k).

Wendel and Blanchett agree that the public policy issue of compelling employers to contribute money toward their employees' retirement fund should be considered.

Blanchett says systems like Australia’s 9.5 per cent minimum SG contribution "really get you to a good place that’s more palatable for employees."

He notes that his parents' generation once had high forced savings rates through company pension plans – a situation that no longer exists.

"If the employers are doing it, we can get there."

Wendel and Blanchett also question whether an Australian-style system would even work in the US. They argue a forced savings plan would cause an employee "revolt" whereas a measured introduction via employers would be more palatable.

Do annuities have a role to play?

When Australia's Retirement Income Review was launched in 2017, annuities looked set to become a cornerstone of the government's solution to helping our large ageing demographic fund their retirement.

Though this has since shifted slightly, it appears annuities will still play a large role in the final recommendations.

The complexity of annuities makes them a tough sell for financial service providers but in the US, where Wendel says they're strongly disliked – even hated.

"Annuities have been pushed and hocked and researched for decades. And people hate them. Let’s be frank, people hate them."

Fear of rising healthcare costs

Another problem with the way the financial services industry approaches retirement income is that it doesn't address people's fear of rising healthcare costs in their senior years.

"We're helping people with regular expenses, great. But we're not addressing their fear of unknown medical expenses. The 'Oh no, what will happen…what if…' scenario," Wendel says.

He points out that the majority of people hold onto their assets much longer than the industry generally assumes they will.

"In the first 20 years of retirement, only about a quarter of their assets are being sold off and used. And so, what are we saving for? The problem is that I think we’re solving the wrong problem," says Wendel.

“If I spend this money now, and I feel comfortable on this path, and then I have this horrible event and then I die on the operating table because I can’t pay for that, or I can’t afford to go on this vacation."

 

Glenn Freeman is Senior Editor at Morningstar Australia.

 


Try Morningstar Premium for free


 


 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Risk in retirement: five strategies for finding the right balance

How decumulation in retirement differs from accumulation

A close look at retiree fears and expectations

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Stop treating the family home as a retirement sacred cow

The way home ownership relates to retirement income is rated a 'D', as in Distortion, Decumulation and Denial. For many, their home is their largest asset but it's least likely to be used for retirement income.

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 433 with weekend update

There’s this story about a group of US Air Force generals in World War II who try to figure out ways to protect fighter bombers (and their crew) by examining the location of bullet holes on returning planes. Mapping the location of these holes, the generals quickly come to the conclusion that the areas with the most holes should be prioritised for additional armour.

  • 11 November 2021

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 431 with weekend update

House prices have risen at the fastest pace for 33 years, but what actually happened in 1988, and why is 2021 different? Here's a clue: the stockmarket crashed 50% between September and November 1987. Looking ahead, where did house prices head in the following years, 1989 to 1991?

  • 28 October 2021

Why has Australia slipped down the global super ranks?

Australia appears to be slipping from the pantheon of global superstar pension systems, with a recent report placing us sixth. A review of an earlier report, which had Australia in bronze position, points to some reasons why, and what might need to happen to regain our former glory.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Are they the four most-costly words in investing?

A surprisingly high percentage of respondents believe 'This Time is Different'. They may be in for a tough time if history repeats as we have seen plenty of asset bubbles before. Do we have new rules for investing?

Investment strategies

Firstlinks survey: the first 100 tips for young investors

From the hundreds of survey responses, we have compiled a sample of 100 and will publish more next week. There are consistent themes in here from decades of mistakes and successes.

Strategy

What should the next generation's Australia look like?

An unwanted fiscal drain will fall on generations of Australians who have seen their incomes and wealth stagnate, having missed the property boom and entered the workforce during a period of flatlining real wages.

Shares

Bank results scorecard: who deserves the gold stars?

The forecasts were wrong. In COVID, banks were expected to face falling house prices, high unemployment and a lending downturn. In the recovery, which banks are awarded gold stars based on the better performance?

Exchange traded products

In the beginning, there were LICs. Where are they now?

While the competing structure, ETFs, has increased in size far quicker in recent years, LICs remain an important part of the listed trust sector. There are differences between Traditional and Trading LICs.

Shares

Should you bank on the Westpac buy-back?

Westpac has sent out details of its buy-back and readers have asked for an explanation. It is not beneficial for all investors and whether this one works for some depends on where the bank sets the final price.

Investment strategies

Understanding the benefits of rebalancing

Whether they know it or not, most investors use of version of a Strategic Asset Allocation (SAA) to create an efficient portfolio mix of different asset classes, but the benefits of rebalancing are often overlooked.

Shares

Six stocks positioned well for a solid but volatile recovery

The rotation to economic recovery favouring value stocks continues but risks loom on the horizon. What lessons can be drawn from reporting season and what are the trends as inflation appears in parts of business?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.