Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 454

Why Australia is crying out for a National Longevity Strategy

Definition: A person’s longevity is ‘the rest of their life’.

Why ‘longevity’

Longevity is a holistic term covering the ‘time base for everything’ in a person’s life.

Most of the terms we associate with increasing lifespans have negative connotations. Consider ageing, retirement, age pension, aged care, age discrimination, home care, seniors, frailty, superannuation and end of life. While each has a specific relevance, a term to cover all of them frees us to envisage the whole framework – the good and the challenges - before focusing on the parts.

The definition starts with the person. We become more different from each other over time. Our own remaining time frame is unique. By just focusing on ‘community’ longevity, we lose sight of how different we are and how differently we respond.

A National Longevity Strategy will focus on maximising the social and financial benefits from:

  • understanding and supporting individuals from midlife in making the best of the rest of their own life through raising their personal longevity awareness
  • development of a longevity aware and proactive community
  • harmonising the activities of government entities involved in longevity support

Where we are

At the end of 2021, there were 4.3 million Australians over the age of 65, about 16% of the population. The five-year cohorts over 65 are the fastest growing across the whole population, averaging 3.5% last year. No other cohort grew faster than 2.5%.

A huge longevity bonus accompanies this growth. Average life expectancies continue to increase. Half the oldest baby boomers alive today (75) are likely to live at least 30% beyond their life expectancy at birth and beyond 90.

However, the longevity bonus is petering out beyond 90, where successive cohorts are living less long than their predecessors. We face an increasing logjam of older Australians – most of whom will still live much longer than was expected when they were born but with more requiring support.

The crisis in aged care remains unresolved, creating major uncertainties in the older community about their future. The pension system encourages people to ‘retire’ at age 67 when at least half achieving this age will live close to their 90s, most independently. While community unemployment is reaching historically low levels, seniors’ employment is not increasing with the demographics.

Large sums are spent on research into better medical treatments for older Australians, yet very little on prevention. Health professionals struggle to reach beyond immediate patient issues to achieve effective preventive health and wellbeing support. The hospital system is fully stretched with little prospect of relief, even after the pandemic, as the ageing demographic grows.

Investment products and services are increasingly complex. Advisers are required to provide expensive and detailed assessments which are becoming even less accessible to many consumers. The Australian Law Reform Commission recently strongly criticised this trend.

Gender imbalance is a distinctive feature of increasing longevity. Women live longer and typically with longer dependency in later life. Women are usually the caregivers and outlive their partners, with less likelihood of personal care themselves. Women are less likely to accumulate superannuation, constrained by rearing children and fewer employment opportunities.

Ethnic inequalities are typified by the shorter total and healthy lifespans of these minorities. A National Longevity Strategy would clarify and provide consistent solutions to many of the challenges.

Consumer groups like COTA and National Seniors make a major contribution but need more support.

Where we could be

We face an increasing challenge of dealing with larger and less healthy numbers of people in their late 80s and early 90s. However, social and medical research is revealing how existing services, products and facilities could be much better harmonised to improve their delivery to the older demographic and reduce the cost.

Longevity research is moving very quickly to understand much more about ageing. It’s increasingly likely we will see real solutions to considerably extend lifespans and quality of life at greater ages. If this happens, it will change the paradigm of ageing on which current responses are based.

Both these opportunities require better oversight and major improvements in how well and how quickly we address increasing longevity in the community, and personally.

National Longevity Strategy

A National Longevity Strategy is urgently needed to effectively deal with the growing challenges and opportunities of increasing personal and community longevity, with bipartisan support.

Separate silos of interest (both in government and in the private sector) have grown strongly to deal with this phenomenon but can work together much more effectively. A National Longevity Strategy will harness all available capabilities and financial resources to make the most of the remarkable community and personal longevity bonus. It will underpin major savings.

To achieve this, the Strategy will draw on and provide oversight and guidance for the activities of:

  • Treasury (demographics, superannuation, tax, financial advice)
  • Social services (age pension, home equity release, disability)
  • Employment (age discrimination, retraining)
  • Health (including doctors, other health providers, health funds and researchers)
  • Aged care
  • The financial planning and legal professions
  • Federal and State governments
  • Superannuation funds and other financial product providers

A primary focus will be on improving longevity awareness of individuals from 60 years of age, along with improving the understanding and support of their health and financial advisers.

As a society, we are responsible for the remarkable longevity phenomenon. A National Longevity Strategy will focus Australians on making the best of it in every way.

 

David Williams is Founder and CEO of My Longevity. Try the SHAPE Analyser to focus on your own longevity.

 

4 Comments
Dudley
April 21, 2022

Australia's longevity strategy is Age Pension and Home Ownership (Capital Gains Tax free offsetting mortgage cost not being tax deductible).

Does not work so well for non-home owners due to smallest interest rates in all of known history increasing home prices faster than a lot can save and causing de-compounding of savings due to negative real interest.

Murray McLean
April 16, 2022

Trevor is right to raise the importance of fair treatment of those affected by disability. However I can’t see that anything David Williams has outlined suggests otherwise and commend his proposal. It is not an ‘either/or’ situation. Both need far more bipartisan, strategic attention.

Trevor
April 17, 2022

Hi Murray McLean : As you know , the moderator often "lends a hand" to the comments "one" submits . And in this case, my main contention was completely omitted : "Australia has so many elderly people because "we" have been very fortunate in not being involved in a major war for the last 70 to 80 years" Had "we" lost many young and fit people in a major war then "the longevity" ratio would be totally different! Every factor would have been different and less favourable than it is now. "We" are all appreciative of the increase in "longevity" and it is no hardship ! And as for the successful management : "We are already achieving it, bumbling along with political bipartisan support, guided by our sense of fair play and decency." QED.

Trevor
April 14, 2022

Sorry David.....you make statements peppered with "facts" that simply don't stack up ! You say : "At the end of 2021, there were 4.3 million Australians over the age of 65, about 16% of the population. The five-year cohorts over 65 are the fastest growing across the whole population, averaging 3.5% last year. No other cohort grew faster than 2.5%." Actually : "Around 1 in 6 (18%) people in Australia—or about 4.4 million—have disability. This is also known as 'disability prevalence'. Another 22% of people in Australia have a long-term health condition but no disability, and the remaining 60% have no disability or long-term health condition (ABS 2019a)." And : "Over 4.4 million people in Australia have some form of disability. That's 1 in 5 people. 17.8% of females and 17.6% of males in Australia have disability." And: "Of the more than 750,000 people on the disability support pension, 3 per cent are able to leave the system to return to the workforce." And: " In April 2021, approximately 619,000 older Australians (aged 65 and over) were employed in the labour force. Of these older workers, 3 in 5 (61%) were men and 2 in 5 were women (39%) (ABS 2021b)" And: "The largest payment is the Age Pension, which around two million older Australians receive, followed by the Disability Support Pension, with more than 700,000 recipients. While 3.5 million people receive payments classified as pensions, one million receive payments classified as allowances." "1.05 million people received DSP or Carer Payment in Australia, equating to 5.1% of the population aged 16 and over". "There are more than 2.65 million carers in Australia, which means about 1 in 11 people in Australia are carers." So......a combination of "disabled people and their carers" far outnumber the "aged pensioners" that dominate your line of thinking. "We have created and maintain this wonderful dynamic and philanthropic and caring society that "takes care of everyone in need"......well.....most of them anyway! As I see it , your claim that "A National Longevity Strategy is urgently needed to effectively deal with the growing challenges and opportunities of increasing personal and community longevity,..." is not factual or required. We are already achieving it, bumbling along with political bipartisan support, guided by our sense of fair play and decency.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Rethinking super tax concessions for the future

Australia isn't ageing as quickly as the Government says

Are lifetime income streams the answer or just the easy way out?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.