Home / 173

Why bother with hedge funds?

If you read the typical hedge fund headlines, you’d think institutional investors were abandoning them in droves. Common issues cited include subdued performance and high fees. In this article I discuss hedge fund performance, the role they play in multi-asset portfolios and how we manage hedge fund investments.

It’s intriguing to hear about well-known investors redeeming their hedge fund assets for performance reasons, and I’m curious about their expectations and whether they were reasonable.

Given there is a huge range of hedge funds available, it also makes me wonder if the investor had any constraints (perhaps related to resources, experience, fees or liquidity) and whether these were consistent with their expectations of the hedge fund manager. Perhaps their liquidity or fee constraints prevented them from hiring better hedge fund managers. The fact is that many hedge fund investors are pleased with their chosen hedge funds and that net flows from institutional investors have been positive for many years, with the exception of the last few months. Recent reports from Barclays (Coming to Terms) and JP Morgan (Institutional Investor Survey) confirm that, as a group, institutional investors continue to allocate to hedge funds despite what the headlines would have you believe.

Net asset flows (US$M) to hedge funds, 2006 to 2016

net-asset-flows-in-usm-to-hedge-funds-2006-to-2016

net-asset-flows-in-usm-to-hedge-funds-2006-to-2016

Source: Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) and HFR.

The role of hedge funds

So what role were hedge funds expected to play in a portfolio context? Did investors expect them to have a negative correlation to equities all the time (to decrease their equity risk), or did they want a highly concentrated equity manager that increased their exposure to equities? It is important to have this well framed at the outset and to understand the associated costs.

If an investor wants a fund that is guaranteed to produce positive returns during equity down markets, are they willing to sacrifice option premium any time the market advances? The benefits we expect from hedge funds include capital preservation, lack of equity correlation during difficult market events and access to otherwise unavailable return streams.

We often see a direct comparison of returns between hedge funds and equities, normally with a headline along the lines of ‘equities outperform hedge funds’, but never the reverse. This of course could be true at any time, but does it really matter? It is worth bearing in mind that hedge funds invest across many different asset classes and target exposure levels that are quite different to equity indexes, so comparing them to any single asset doesn’t make much sense, even though it does make a good headline.

Direct comparisons also fail to take into account the different types of risks inherent in each investment. You rarely read extended stories about equities outperforming bonds, for instance, because most people understand that the risks involved in each are quite different, so it makes little sense to compare them. To this point, I find it surprising that a large number of investors think that hedge funds in aggregate are riskier than equities even though any research I have seen would point to a well-managed portfolio of hedge funds being substantially less risky than equities (in terms of capital preservation and volatility).

While we think of risk as multi-faceted, highly subjective and impossible to reduce to a single number, for the purposes of this study we’ll use volatility as a risk proxy because it has gained wide support from investors. On this basis, since 2009 we have seen a decrease in the volatility of most hedge fund returns and current levels are 20% below the average of the past 15 years. Equities on the other hand are currently running at volatility levels approximately 20% above the average for the same time period.

Additionally, hedge funds in aggregate display a far lower level of volatility than equities due to their active risk management. The graph below shows the significantly lower volatility of the hedge fund composite index than the main equity index.

Annualised volatility of hedge funds, S&P500 and global bonds.

annualised-volatility-of-hedge-funds-sp500-and-global-bonds

Source: AIMA Research

There is a widely held but largely incorrect view that, due to the use of techniques such as shorting and leverage, hedge funds are riskier than traditional long-only equities. These techniques create different risks, but that doesn’t necessarily make hedge funds any riskier. There may be individual funds that are riskier than equities, but the vast majority of hedge funds use these techniques to reduce, not increase their risk. Of course, the results will vary among managers due to their skill in applying the techniques, but in aggregate hedge funds are substantially less risky than equities using almost any commonly accepted measure of risk.

US stocks have outperformed hedge funds in recent years, but longer-term performance going back decades shows hedge funds delivering significant outperformance, especially on a volatility-adjusted basis. At certain times, it is normal for hedge funds to underperform equities, but over time their ability to protect capital during tough times can result in their outperformance. We continue to believe that investors and financial advisers should consider the role and benefits that hedge funds can play in a diversified investment portfolio.

 

Craig Stanford is Head of Alternative Investments with Morningstar Investment Management Australia Limited and Chairs the Investor Education Committee for AIMA in Australia. This material has been prepared for educational purposes only, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. You should seek your own financial advice.

RELATED ARTICLES

What role should hedge funds play now?

The long and short of hedge funds, Part 2

4 Comments

Rob

September 17, 2016

Hi Just read the article on the merits of hedge funds - the first bit of common sense I've read on this topic in years, great article, thanks. How do sophisticated investors get access to hedge funds, where can we go to compare the investment styles of different managers so that an investment decision can be made? I have found that hedge funds are just not on the radar of my traditional advisors (probably because they stand to gain no fees from any allocation made to them). Kind regards Rob

SMSF Trustee

September 18, 2016

Rob, my SMSF uses a couple which I access via the AMP North investment platform that I use. Which, by the way, my 'traditional' advisor put me on to.

Don't know how you get access without a platform that includes them.

(Editor's note: Most major platforms from the large retail funds include a range of 'alternative' options).

Warren Bird

September 16, 2016

Institutions that use such vehicles tend not to call them 'hedge funds'. The word 'alternatives' is more common, in the sense that Jerome has in mind, viz that they are an alternative way of engaging with markets than only being long in a range of asset classes.

One issue is that, unlike the traditional asset classes - "equities" or "bonds" or "property" - the alternatives space has no underlying return that is available to all investors as the heart of the return. Long equities gives you the return of the market plus or minus the manager's contribution minus fees. Going into alternatives only gives you the manager's contribution minus fees.

If you think the underlying market return is going to be negative, then taking that element out of the equation makes sense. However, going into alternatives creates the potential for a much wider disparity of outcomes, depending on which managers/funds you use. In turn, this requires a lot more work upfront in understanding each fund's style, resourcing, risk management, etc. The moreso since the sector tends to think itself so much better than anyone else that it charges very large fees, which are always a minus element in the equation.

The same can be said for other alternatives such as private equity. Getting the right fund is crucial. The bad performers in these areas are really bad.

I don't think this can be lightly dismissed. You can't just shrug your shoulders and say 'naturally, there will be disappointments'. The sector doesn't sell itself as having as much downside risk as actually exists for getting it wrong. And the costs of exiting once you decide that you made a wrong choice can be horrendous.

As a sector, alternatives/hedge funds are worthy of consideration. But I agree with Jerome about the importance of being selective. Being skeptical about the performance claims of many in this sector is also important - they tend to talk a great story!

Jerome Lander

September 15, 2016

It is hard to imagine a better time to use hedge funds than the present given the economic backdrop and risks to mainstream long only investing!
Naturally, there will be disappointments and this is a space - like all other opportunities - where having an open mind and being selective is essential.
Anyway, need to go back to looking for more good hedge funds....


 

Leave a Comment:

     

Most viewed in recent weeks

Retirees facing steep increases for basic items

ASFA has updated its tables on how much money is needed for a 'comfortable' or 'modest' lifestyle in retirement, but there are some unavoidable prices rising well ahead of inflation.

Let’s stop calling them ‘bond proxies’

With cash and term deposit rates at all-time lows, and fixed interest bonds not much better, investors are looking for ‘bond proxies’ to deliver more income. But is ‘proxy’ a misnomer, and what are they anyway?

Adele Ferguson on ‘Banking Bad’ and weaving magic

The journalist most responsible for the calling of the Royal Commission takes care not to be roped in by everyone with a complaint to push. It takes experienced judgement to gather the right information.

Six warning bells against property spruikers

Property spruikers use common techniques, and con men will increasingly target older people who feel they do not have enough financial independence for their retirement years.

Helping your children build their super

It has become more difficult to build large superannuation balances with contribution caps and more people paying off home loans for longer. How can wealthy parents help their adult children?

Betashares

banner

Sponsors

Alliances

Special eBooks

Specially-selected collections of the best articles 

Read more

Earn CPD Hours

Accredited CPD hours reading Firstlinks

Read more

Pandora Archive

Firstlinks articles are collected in Pandora, Australia's national archive.

Read more