Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 482

What can retirement savers do in bleak markets?

Financial market conditions appear bleak. Inflation has driven interest rates higher, leading to falling prices in the equity and bond markets. The contrast with a prolonged period of rising prices in both markets is huge.

It’s natural for retirement savers to feel depressed, not just about the present but also about future prospects. And it’s particularly gloomy because the ballast traditionally provided by bonds when equities fall can no longer be taken for granted.

So the big question is: what can you do? I’ll focus on three aspects.

  • What can savers do?
  • What can retirees do?
  • And what can you do to prepare for the inevitable next episode of adverse conditions?

Falling markets can be good for savers

The first question is the most comforting to answer. Savers should recognise that their assets no longer conform to their planned allocation (whatever it might be). So the first thing is to rebalance back to it. This has the fortunate effect of buying into whatever has fallen furthest, taking advantage of the new lower prices.

In fact falling markets are, perhaps paradoxically, good for savers. Think of the falling prices as a sale. The amounts you had planned to invest regularly will now buy more units of each asset class than they would at the previous higher prices.

Of course that advantage only holds if falls are temporary. But they usually are. That’s the good news. There’s always the possibility that markets never recover. That’s what author William Bernstein calls ‘deep risk’ – and frankly there’s no satisfactory way to deal with that. It’s little comfort that the whole world will be seriously affected, not just you – but that’s the reality of it.

So let’s assume that the falls are not so much long-term as short-term or medium-term. And short-term falls are not a problem if you don’t panic and sell. The only defence against panic is to think rationally rather than emotionally.

The savers most affected by a medium-term fall are those who are relatively close to having to start cashing out gradually as they approach retirement. And the same problem is even worse for those who are already in retirement and see their pension pot fall in value. So let’s focus on them, and get to the second question I mentioned earlier.

Retirees need to have a 'safety pot'

Retirees are particularly vulnerable to what is termed, in the jargon, ‘sequence of returns risk’. They don’t have the luxury of waiting to allow future high returns make up for current negative returns, because their assets are declining as they make withdrawals to sustain their spending needs, and those future high returns act on a smaller asset base. So a sequence of returns that starts low or negative can’t be balanced by later high returns.

That means it’s essential to have a part of your pension pot that’s relatively immune to falling asset prices. And the only such assets are cash-like assets, or at any rate short-term assets, which decline little as interest rates rise.

I think of this as a ‘safety pot’, in contrast to the rest of the pot, which is your ‘growth-seeking pot’. Of course there’s a further problem right now, in that stable-value assets are no protection against high inflation.

The only protection lies in assets with returns that are themselves linked to inflation. Americans are lucky in that the US government issues what are called I-Class Savings Bonds (I-bonds for short) with returns that are constantly adjusted to match inflation.

It’s these types of safety-oriented assets – or, if you don’t hold any, the shortest-term bonds in your portfolio – that offer you the least costly defence against sequence of returns risk.

Lessons for the next market fall

This leads to the final question. What lessons can you learn for next time?

The answer for those of you who are more than, say, five years from having to withdraw money from your pot is nothing, other than that it’s wise to have a long-term investment plan which you can stick to, such as the now traditional ‘glide path’ that underlies many accumulation plans for retirement.

Why five years? There’s no magic to the number. It’s the period of time when historically markets tend to recover to their inflation-adjusted levels after a fall. And yes, history is not a prediction of the future, but it’s at least a guide.

The answer for retirees and those closest to retirement? Build up that safety pot to allow you to gradually withdraw up to five years of spending without touching your growth-oriented pot if the market takes time to recover from a fall. (I wrote about this strategy a year ago.) And the ultimate defence: be willing to adjust your spending too. Life constantly changes. If we can adjust without too much pain, that’s a big defence against panicky reactions.

 

Don Ezra, now retired, is the former Co-Chairman of global consulting for Russell Investments worldwide, and the author of “Life Two: how to get to and enjoy what used to be called retirement”. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

11 Comments
Brian
November 05, 2022

Floating rate bank hybrids provide a hedge, sure they are not gauranteed but if the big 5 banks fail (include macquarie) we will be in much more trouble than is suggested in the article

A K Mani
November 02, 2022

What about the Australian Govt Bonds? How are they faring?
Any opinions for investments for retirees?

Steve
November 02, 2022

LaTrobe 12 Month Term Account paying 5.3% pa (and increasing) is a no-brainer.

K
November 05, 2022

Mortgage fund. "Withdrawal rights are subject to liquidity and may be delayed / suspended.” No government guarantee.

Neil
November 02, 2022

"Americans are lucky in that the US government issues what are called I-Class Savings Bonds (I-bonds for short) with returns that are constantly adjusted to match inflation."

Australians can get into govt inflation linked bonds very easily on the ASX through the iShares Government Inflation ETF (ASX:ILB). Price has gone up about 5% in the last month, presumably as inflation-for-longer expectations start to take hold.

Paul Rider
November 02, 2022

Hi Neil, correct me if I wrong but ILB and I-Bonds are somewhat different. With ILB, principal values are adjusted to incorporate the current inflation rates. Whereas I-Bonds get an adjustment to their interest rate to reflect inflation.

SMSF Trustee
November 02, 2022

Paul, maths are much the same. Adjust the principal for inflation and the fixed interest rate pays an increased dollar amount in line with the inflation rate.
Some inflation linked securities do it one way, some the other. But the inflation hedging works out the same.

Paul Rider
November 03, 2022

Hi Warren, then why is ILB down 11% Ytd? If it acted as hedge against rising inflation, the price should have increased with skyrocketing inflation. It hasn't acted as a hedge at all.

James
November 03, 2022

"If it acted as hedge against rising inflation, the price should have increased with skyrocketing inflation."

Because perversely, inflation and interest rates have gone up simultaneously!

Warren Bird
November 05, 2022

Paul, I assume you are asking your question about my comment about the maths generating a bounce back, which isn't part of this particular thread.

In any case let me answer your question. Inflation linked bonds hedge income and cash flows for rising inflation in the short term, but capital only over the long term. Capital values fluctuate as real yields fluctuate, the same as the way nominal bonds fluctuate with nominal yields.
So the reason that capital values of ILB have fallen is that the real yields at which they're trading have risen.
If you owned ILB before this market move then you will over the life of the security earn the real yield that it was paying then. The capital value when it matures will have been increased with inflation, thus lifting your quarterly nominal income in line with the CPI too.
To use your language, the cash flows you are being paid have "skyrocketed" with inflation. So has the inflation-adjustment factor that applies to the face value of these securities. But their traded value has been reduced by the rise in real yields.
Of course, ILB have never promised to be a short term total return inflation hedge. If they've been marketed to you by someone saying something different then it's that marketers mistake, not the fault of the governments who've issued them.

Warren Bird
November 02, 2022

Of course, with bonds the bounce back is guaranteed by the way the asset class works. Those bonds that have risen in yield from 1% to 4%, causing a negative return in the process, will now return 4% per year to maturity as they amortise to par value at maturity. Shares have historically bounced back, but don't have the same mathematical certainty to do so.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

The five-act future if we knew we’d live to 100

How to help people with retirement spending decisions

Digging deeper into planning for retirement spending

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.