Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 13

Capital allocation and management ability – Part 2

 

In last week’s Cuffelinks, I showed this table, where a company with a profit of $50,000 was trading on a price to earnings ratio of 10, to give a market capitalisation of $500,000. It did not pay a dividend, and in the second year, it made a return on equity of 5% again, giving it $52,500 in net profit. I left you with the question, with profits and market capitalisation rising, what’s the problem?

Table 1: How to lose money despite profits and capitalisation rising

Year 1

Year 2

Equity at Beginning

$1,000,000

$1,050,000

Return on Equity

5%

5%

Net Profit

$50,000

$52,500

Dividend

$0

Equity at End

$1,050,000

Price Earnings Ratio

10

10

Market Capitalisation

$500,000

$525,000

 

On the surface things look rosy. The company is growing, equity and profits have increased and management is no doubt drafting an annual report that reflects satisfaction with this turn of events. But not all is as it first appears. Indeed management has, perhaps unwittingly, dudded shareholders.

Dividends and capital gains

As a shareholder your return is made up of two components – dividends and capital gains. If two dollars is earned and you don’t receive one of those dollars as a dividend, then you should receive it as a capital gain. If, over time you don’t, it has been lost and management may be to blame. Every dollar that a company retains by not paying a dividend should be turned into at least a dollar of long-term market value through capital gains.

The company has not achieved this and unfortunately lost its investors money. Even though the company appears to have grown – remember equity and profits are indeed growing – the reality is that as a shareholder you have lost money. How? The company ‘retained’ all of the $50,000 of the profits it earned in Year 1. You received no dividends. All you got was capital gain but the capital gains were only $25,000. In other words the company failed to turn each dollar of retained profits into a dollar of market value. And so investors have lost $25,000. If the situation were to continue, you should insist that the company stop growing and return all profits as dividends and if that is not possible, the company should be wound up or sold.

What happened to the other $25,000? You didn’t get the money as a dividend and you didn’t get it as a capital gain. It was lost. The only way of receiving it is if the price earnings ratio went up. That would require people to pay more for the shares and hoping for that to happen would be like betting on number 5 in race 7 or betting on black. And that is speculating not investing. It might happen but there is no way of predicting it. The worst business to own is one that consistently employs growing amounts of capital at very low rates of return. This is because for a low-return business demanding incremental funds, growth harms the investor financially.

By retaining money, the company is hurting investors as it expands. The reason for retention of profits is largely irrelevant because, either the money needs to be retained which makes it a poor business or management chooses to retain which makes them poor decision makers.

Many investors don’t understand this very real way of losing money even when the company is reporting profits. But investors aren’t the only ones for whom this lesson is lost. A large number of company directors don’t understand this ‘loss’ either or, if they do, they apply their knowledge with a dose of schizophrenia. Inside their businesses, they employ managers in a variety of divisions, who in turn conduct analysis to determine whether to expand their domain. If the returns aren’t high enough they don’t invest in expansion, instead sending the profits back to head office to be invested elsewhere for higher returns. But when the whole business isn’t earning a high return on equity, those same directors often don’t send the money back to the owners to be invested elsewhere. They keep the money! They find something to buy or they pay themselves more. And some, even if they do pay the profits out as a dividend, replace what they paid out by raising money through a dividend reinvestment plan or some other form of capital-raising. This is not a problem for a high return business, but it is reprehensible for a low return business with few prospects of improving its earning power (return on equity).

Back to our company above, many chief executives will present its results in the annual report as reflective of a great year. What they won’t say is that they have lost half of your money!

Thanks to return on equity, we are able to assess management’s treatment of shareholders and discern whether they are favoured or flouted.

Management act like owners

It is important to look for businesses where management act like owners and treat shareholders like owners. Keeping funds for growth when the returns are low is not acting like an owner. A manager who behaves this way is not treating you like one either. As Adam Smith observed in 1774, it is almost impossible to align the interests of a manager with those of the owner when the manager is merely employed to manage the company on the owner’s behalf.

The decision by management to pay dividends or retain profits falls under the heading of ‘capital allocation’ and when managers are making capital allocation decisions, it's essential that they increase the intrinsic value of the company on a per-share basis and avoid doing things that destroy it. In Part 3 of this guide, I will show how allocation decisions can have a material impact on the per share intrinsic value of a company. For executive directors, while it is important they understand how to run the business to its full potential, this knowledge and the positive results are wasted if the board knows little about capital allocation.

The above example demonstrates that a company with a low rate of return on equity will lose money for its shareholders if profits are unwisely retained. As Warren Buffett further observed, if profits are unwisely retained it is likely that management have been unwisely retained too.

Roger Montgomery is the founder and Chief Investment Officer at The Montgomery Fund.


 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Companies crying wolf

Equity income investors should focus on reinvestment rates

Not all growth is good

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Latest Updates

Retirement

Stop treating the family home as a retirement sacred cow

The way home ownership relates to retirement income is rated a 'D', as in Distortion, Decumulation and Denial. For many, their home is their largest asset but it's least likely to be used for retirement income.

Property

Hey boomer, first home buyers and all the fuss

What is APRA worried about? The ‘average’ mortgagee can easily absorb increases in interest rates without posing a systemic threat to the banking system. Housing lending is a relatively risk-free activity for banks.

Property

Residential Property Survey Q3 2021

Housing market sentiment has eased from record highs and confidence has ticked down as house price rises slow. Construction costs overtook lack of development sites as the biggest impediment for new housing.

Investment strategies

Personal finance is 80% personal and 20% finance

Understanding your own biases and behviours is even more important than learning about markets. Overcome four major cognitive biases that may be sabotaging your investing and recognise them in others.

Where do stockmarket returns come from over time?

Cash flow statements differ from income statements and balance sheets, and every company must balance payments to investors versus investing into the business. Cash flows drive the value of the business.

Fixed interest

How to invest in the ‘reopening of Australia’ in bonds

As Sydney and Melbourne emerge from lockdown, there are some reopening trades in the Australian credit market which 'sophisticated' investors should consider as part of their fixed income portfolios.

Shares

10 trends reshaping the future of emerging markets

Demand for air travel, China’s growing middle-class population, Brazil’s digital payments take-up, Indian IPOs, and increased urbanisation are just some of the trends being seen in emerging economies.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.