Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 253

Check tax exemption on income from super pension assets

There is confusion about which method to use when calculating the tax exemption on income from assets supporting superannuation retirement pensions. This confusion stems from changes to the superannuation law that took effect from 1 July 2017 and the Tax Office’s interpretation of the tax law. Let’s clear this up.

The difference between segregated and unsegregated assets

As SMSF members will usually retire at different times, and because the tax treatment of income from SMSF assets differs between accumulation and pension phases, the correct proportion of tax-exempt and tax payable income needs to be determined. There are cases where specific SMSF assets are held for the benefit of specific members, meaning there is a segregation of assets. Or the assets can be unsegregated, where the SMSF’s assets and income will be supporting all members, retired or not. The existence of segregated or unsegregated assets determines how the tax exemption is calculated.

Unsegregated versus segregated method

If an SMSF has a member with a total super balance in excess of $1.6 million (as at prior 30 June) across all of their super funds, and the person is in receipt of a retirement pension, then the SMSF can only calculate the tax exemption using the unsegregated or proportionate method. This is regardless of whether the SMSF’s pension assets were segregated at any time during the current financial year.

If an SMSF has members in receipt of retirement pensions and each of these member’s total superannuation balance does not exceed $1.6 million across all their superannuation funds at 30 June of the previous financial year, then the SMSF can claim the tax exemption using the relevant segregated and/or unsegregated method.

For fund members with a total superannuation balance not exceeding $1.6 million, the Tax Office’s interpretation of the tax law is based on whether the SMSF had pension assets that were segregated at any time throughout the financial year. If so, then the SMSF must calculate the tax exemption using the segregated method for that time period.

If, during a financial year, an SMSF did have pension assets that were segregated but at a later time it no longer had segregated pension assets, then it must use the segregated method to calculate the tax exemption for the time period where the pension assets were segregated. It must use the unsegregated method to calculate the tax exemption for the period the SMSF’s assets were no longer segregated.

Prior to 1 July 2017, SMSF trustees and professionals were simply using the unsegregated method to calculate the tax exemption when SMSFs had segregated pension assets at some time during the financial year, and unsegregated assets at other times during the same financial year. They did this to simplify the tax exemption calculation. Unfortunately, the Tax Office has stated that using the unsegregated method for those situations is no longer an option from 1 July 2017.

Let’s look at an example

Assume an SMSF has two members in the accumulation phase on 1 July 2017. On 1 October 2017, both members commenced retirement pensions with their total superannuation balance of $1 million each. Then on 1 December 2017, one of the members makes non-concessional contributions into the SMSF and on 1 February 2018 commences a second retirement pension account.

This means the SMSF was completely in the retirement pension phase during the periods 1 October 2017 to 30 November 2017 and 1 February 2018 to 30 June 2018. However, the SMSF was not entirely in the pension phase during 1 July 2017 to 30 September 2017 and 1 December 2017 to 31 January 2018. The SMSF trustee will need to take into account four accounting periods. They must apply the segregated method of a 100% tax exemption on investment earnings of pension assets during the period the SMSF was completely in pension phase and apply the unsegregated method to the other periods when the SMSF was not totally in pension phase.

The calculation of the tax exemption is certainly more complex now and it is most important that SMSF trustees and professionals are aware of this.

 

Monica Rule is an SMSF Specialist and author. See www.monicarule.com.au.

 

  •   10 May 2018
  • 4
  •      
  •   
4 Comments
Ian Fehlberg
May 10, 2018

Under Related Posts
The top 10 hints for SMSF trustees before 30 June is for 2015.
Is there an updated 2018 version

Graham Hand
May 11, 2018

Hi Ian, we will publish some EOFY for 2018 in the next couple of weeks. The 'Related Posts' are automatically generated by the website and may not be the most up-to-date. We have many EOFY papers if you input 'EOFY' in the search box in the top right. For example, this from last year: https://cuffelinks.com.au/cuffe-article/tips-optimise-super-30-june-2017/ and from the year before: https://cuffelinks.com.au/cuffe-article/smsf-year-end-checklist/.

Michael
May 15, 2018

Monica

A useful article as there is a lot of complexity being introduced with limited communication on the detail by the ATO to Trustees.

Re the statement in your article "If an SMSF has members in receipt of retirement pensions and each of these member’s total superannuation balance is less than $1.6 million across all their superannuation funds at 30 June of the previous financial year, then the SMSF can claim the tax exemption using the relevant segregated and/or unsegregated method."

Could you confirm this applies to the following situation when a member is receiving a pension from another Fund :

1. Member 1 of the SMSF (total superannuation balance of > $1.6m across all Funds) has an accumulation account in the SMSF. Member 1 is in receipt of a retirement pension from another Fund (not the SMSF)
2. Member 2 of the SMSF ( total superannuation balance < $1.6m) is in receipt of a retirement pension from the SMSF

Can the SMSF claim the tax exemption using the segregated method as each (the) member in receipt of the retirement pension in the SMSF has a balance of less than $1.6m?

Monica Rule
May 24, 2018

Hi Michael,

Sorry for the late reply. The answer to your question is "no". The SMSF will not be able to use the segregated method. I have outlined this scenario in my May Newsletter in example 2:

Example 2: Jack and Jill are members of their SMSF. At 30 June 2017, Jack has an accumulation account of $800,000 in his SMSF and a retirement pension account of $900,000 in another superannuation fund. Jill has a retirement pension account of $700,000 in their SMSF.

In this example, Jack has a total superannuation balance of $1,700,000 (i.e. $800,000 accumulation account in the SMSF + $900,000 pension account with another super fund). Jack has a superannuation interest with the SMSF (i.e. his accumulation account). Jill is receiving a retirement pension from the SMSF. The SMSF is ineligible to use the segregated method and must use the unsegregated method to calculate the tax exemption. An actuarial certificate will be required and must apply to the full year of income.

The full newsletter can be found here: http://www.monicarule.com.au/?page_id=1604

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Why it’s better to be a small investor

6 quick SMSF tips for the 2021/22 financial year

Latest SMSF updates from the ATO

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.